The Golden Rule As Stemming From Geometry

Topic by John Doe

John Doe

Home Forums Philosophy The Golden Rule As Stemming From Geometry

This topic contains 33 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by Gravel Pit  Gravel Pit 1 year, 1 month ago.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 34 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #879576
    +1
    John Doe
    John Doe
    Participant
    743

    The Golden Rule As Stemming From Geometry.

    1) “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” observes a self-reflective nature of the individual and the group.

    2) Treating others as one wants to be treated observes an alternation between what one values and does not value.

    3) Treating other as one want to be treated observes a reciprocation from the one being treated as such.

    4) The formation and practice of values depends upon a circulation and projection which gives premise to the value as a point of origin.

    5) This Golden Rule in turn reflects to the axiom of “you reap as you sow” further arguing points 1 through 4.

    6) The Golden rule in turn exists as an observation of constant cycles with these constant cycles observed relatively through facets of moral decisions (live by the sword and die by the sword, if you want respect treat others with respect, if you steal all will be stolen from you, etc.).

    7) The relativistic nature of the Golden rule reflects through many variations which exist as constants in themselves while being extensions of the Golden rule both stemming from a circular and linear nature with value being the point of origin that is the foundation of both the actions and the geometric forms through which they exist.

    The Golden Rule exists as a constant of infinite actions as “being”. “Being” is observed through multiple states of “being” as extensions of the 1 “being” yet “beings” in themselves through the “1 being”. So “life” may be observed as the constant with this constant being observed through various facets of it as property ownership, reproduction, social ettiquette as culture, etc. These “cycles”, stemming from the one cycle, in turn exist through further cycles such as the practical everday decisions of the above. This exists so on and so forth.

    Property ownership may exist as one cycle of the golden rule at the international level, stem down to certain laws at the state level, which stem down to further laws at the county level. This in turn stems down to the individual where the collection of individuals as practicing some form of common value system through the golden rule (considering the golden rule requires a formation of values in the respect it requires a from of self-referencing; ie “treat others as you would like to be treated). This collection of values cycling through the individuals in turn cycles back to the collective identity of the country, relative to property ownship in this case, where a continual maintainance of values occurs through the cycling between the macro and micro level of cultural identity.

    This maintainance of certain core values effectively causes a disstillation of other values as well where certain values are deemed as bad because other’s are good. In these respects the golden rule requires a constant process of change in regards to keeping certain values in the face of percieved change.

    The Golden rule necessitates a choice in not just values and value formation but effectively expresses moral actualities and potentialities by allow a form of generosity where the individual maintains some degree of choice and inherent nature of generating the boundaries of their personal condition.

    The dualism of the good man and evil man, both practicing there respective choices, observes the one forms the other and this personal freedom of “value” necessitates an inherent element of synthesis and creativity where the person creates the judgements they will be judge by in the face of a percievable inversive opposition conducive in form and function to void.

    In simpler terms a person forms themselves in the encapsulation of darkness and chaos through there use of reason from which they will be simultaneously judged by.

    It is not a moral conundrum but rather a foundation of generation through synthesis.

    This in turn reflects to practical decisions.

    The nature of practicality, as premised in the pursuit and sustainment of activity towards a specific ends still observes not just a form of reciprocation between parties but a necessary form of self-reflection in determining the direction of the action itself.

    Relative to reciprocation between parties one may make a practical decision of spending money on a new car in order to get to work. Reciprocation is still in affect as money is directed from the individual towards the car salesman and in turn the property rights of the car is directed from the salemans to the individual buying the car. One set of actions cycles to another.

    In a seperate respect a form of self-reflection is involved, where the individual must determine the action as well as the values connected to that action. For further example in deciding to buy a new car he would have to directed his attention to certain values in himself which build a part of his identity. One value may simply be luxury and not wanting to walk a long distance to work. Another may simply be a value on time. Regardless, of what value(s) the individual directs himself towards these values are an extension of the individual and the individual is effectively cycling through himself where the value is maintained by a constant repetition in the thought process (a memory of the ease of riding in a car rather than walking 5 miles one way) where this value is connected to a set of actions that are inherent within the individual’s awareness (such as buying, selling, borrowing, etc.)

    The value which is observed as most symmetrical to the action inherent within the individual is chosen as a course of action which in turn forms the individual further. This symmetry may simply be an observation of various thoughts/actions as connecting in a manner which results in a sort of equilibrium or balance to the individual. For example having excess money which may not be spent on anything may seem to balance the value that the individual likes to save time by driving to work rather than walking. The money is a means of buying more time in this case where the individual can pursue other courses of action.

    In these respects the golden rule applies as a sort of means in which the individual not just directs there own movements but structures there own value system and course of action by giving structure to the self through a formation of thought and action. The golden rule, as self-reflective, is the formation of the self through a repitition of the inherent thoughts, actions and feelings which structure the self. This repitition observes a form of circularity in the respect certain aspects of the self are constantly repeated while in a seperate respect observes a from of linear projection in which the individual projects away from himself through the values deemed as most coherently ordered to him.

    #879578
    +2
    Carnage
    Carnage
    Participant
    22113

    1 rule, kill them before they kill you, this is the jungle, all thise rules gonna get you killed.

    To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

    #879580
    +1
    John Doe
    John Doe
    Participant
    743

    1 rule, kill them before they kill you, this is the jungle, all thise rules gonna get you killed.

    I don’t have to kill anyone, if they want to kill themselves let them kill themselves.

    If they want to kill you, and considering we are all connected through action in one manner or another, let them kill themselves. This is considering to kill another is to kill oneself.

    If you want to kill them, you are killing yourself.

    #879582
    +4
    Gravel Pit
    Gravel Pit
    Participant

    I’m looking forward to reading this critically, not in an effort to p~~~ you off but I’m genuinely interested…. but I’m certainly skeptical because of the plethora of other content you’ve written here at this website for over 3 years…. Not all of it was coherent bro.

    It’s no secret how stubbornly religious you are. You straight up refuse to concede rational logic sometimes. I dont know, maybe you’ve changed.

    The title of this thread and a brief skimming of the paragraphs doesn’t suggest it but Im glad you’re back on here. We need Keymaster to re-open registration. This place needs fresh blood bad. Hopefully former MENbers will keep coming back…

    #879583
    +1
    Gravel Pit
    Gravel Pit
    Participant

    Your capacity to draw comparisons from geometry and tie them in with sociology is pretty weird but interesting. If anything, we value abstract thought. This is the kind of thing we need more of on this website. More members are required though. Its been a tough year with much controversy surrounding the owner (Keymaster) and his split attention between the future of this website and whatever else he is up to…

    #879593
    +1
    JB Books
    JB Books
    Participant
    3182

    I started reading Doe’s post, but it was like listening to a woman… went on and on and on. What the hell was it all about?
    Wait – I don’t care!

    We just don't realize life's most significant events while they're happening. Back then, I thought, "Well, there'll be other days". I didn't realize that that was the only day. - "Moonlight" Graham

    #879599
    +1
    Carnage
    Carnage
    Participant
    22113

    I started reading Doe’s post, but it was like listening to a woman… went on and on and on. What the hell was it all about?Wait – I don’t care!

    I know boring right.

    At least let me tease him a little bit.

    To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

    #879600
    John Doe
    John Doe
    Participant
    743

    I’m looking forward to reading this critically, not in an effort to p~~~ you off but I’m genuinely interested…. but I’m certainly skeptical because of the plethora of other content you’ve written here at this website for over 3 years…. Not all of it was coherent bro.
    It’s no secret how stubbornly religious you are. You straight up refuse to concede rational logic sometimes. I dont know, maybe you’ve changed.
    The title of this thread and a brief skimming of the paragraphs doesn’t suggest it but Im glad you’re back on here. We need Keymaster to re-open registration. This place needs fresh blood bad. Hopefully former MENbers will keep coming back…

    I will address the foundations of reason, such as the basic rules of logic as well as the issues of fallacies at another time.

    I will also address the concept and nature of God through reason.

    Elaborate me on what’s up with keymaster.

    #879601
    John Doe
    John Doe
    Participant
    743

    Your capacity to draw comparisons from geometry and tie them in with sociology is pretty weird but interesting. If anything, we value abstract thought. This is the kind of thing we need more of on this website. More members are required though. Its been a tough year with much controversy surrounding the owner (Keymaster) and his split attention between the future of this website and whatever else he is up to…

    View it this way, and I will address this further on other posts, all being exists through “directed movement”. This applies to empirical and abstract phenomenon as well.

    The issue why this site has issues with abstract thought, all people due generally, is because the majority of people are dealing with problems of sensory gratification.

    #879602
    John Doe
    John Doe
    Participant
    743

    I started reading Doe’s post, but it was like listening to a woman… went on and on and on. What the hell was it all about?Wait – I don’t care!

    Thanks for giving me an example and caring enough to Express your opinion.

    1. The problem, you claim, is that is sounds like a woman.

    2. You project this problem, which is ingrained in your identity, by seeing it where you look.

    3. In projecting the problem you become it. The standard “I am bored” “I dont care” and general complaining are the same attributes as a woman.

    #879606
    +1
    Carnage
    Carnage
    Participant
    22113

    1 rule, kill them before they kill you, this is the jungle, all thise rules gonna get you killed.

    I don’t have to kill anyone, if they want to kill themselves let them kill themselves.
    If they want to kill you, and considering we are all connected through action in one manner or another, let them kill themselves. This is considering to kill another is to kill oneself.
    If you want to kill them, you are killing yourself.

    Justin trudeau is that you?

    News for you pall:

    1) we are not conected, i didnt even knew you existed and if you stop existing i woldnt give a crap.

    2) GOD IS NOT REAL.

    If someone kills you, you die, end of history.

    To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

    #879608
    +2
    Carnage
    Carnage
    Participant
    22113

    The universe is ruled by kaos, desorder, enthropy and a power struggle between the gravity of planets, the sun, known matter ans dark matter, atoms clash and change electrons constanly, molecules are formed and destroyed constantly, energy change from one state to another, things bind and ceparate in an futile effort to stay in a stable form a little longer, like you breath and eat and s~~~.

    AND IT ALL DOESNT MEAN ANYTHING.

    Your geometry in everything is nothing more than thing trying to balance for a bit longer, at the end it all comes to kaos.

    To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

    #879609
    +1
    John Doe
    John Doe
    Participant
    743

    1 rule, kill them before they kill you, this is the jungle, all thise rules gonna get you killed.

    I don’t have to kill anyone, if they want to kill themselves let them kill themselves.If they want to kill you, and considering we are all connected through action in one manner or another, let them kill themselves. This is considering to kill another is to kill oneself.If you want to kill them, you are killing yourself.

    Justin trudeau is that you?
    News for you pall:
    1) we are not conected, i didnt even knew you existed and if you stop existing i woldnt give a crap.
    2) GOD IS NOT REAL.
    If someone kills you, you die, end of history.

    That’s nice. Considering you just responded to my point with another point, my point is proven.

    So God is not real, okay, considering one definition of God is “ALL” you may want to start negating everything right now…it may take a while to negate infinity.

    So I die, my deteriorated body does not provide the foundation for further organisms?

    #879610
    John Doe
    John Doe
    Participant
    743

    The universe is ruled by kaos, desorder, enthropy and a power struggle between the gravity of planets, the sun, known matter ans dark matter, atoms clash and change electrons constanly, molecules are formed and destroyed constantly, energy change from one state to another, things bind and ceparate in an futile effort to stay in a stable form a little longer, like you breath and eat a

    Is this argument chaotic?

    If electrons exist through continually infinite variation do electrons really change?

    #879611
    John Doe
    John Doe
    Participant
    743

    1 rule, kill them before they kill you, this is the jungle, all thise rules gonna get you killed.

    I don’t have to kill anyone, if they want to kill themselves let them kill themselves.If they want to kill you, and considering we are all connected through action in one manner or another, let them kill themselves. This is considering to kill another is to kill oneself.If you want to kill them, you are killing yourself.

    Justin trudeau is that you?
    News for you pall:
    1) we are not conected, i didnt even knew you existed and if you stop existing i woldnt give a crap.
    2) GOD IS NOT REAL.
    If someone kills you, you die, end of history.

    Thanks for proving my point with another point that branches from my own.

    And what is the nature of God if you are going to negate this definition?

    So if I die, and my body decays and acts as a foundation for further organisms…in this sense alone am I fully dead?

    #879614
    Carnage
    Carnage
    Participant
    22113

    1 rule, kill them before they kill you, this is the jungle, all thise rules gonna get you killed.

    I don’t have to kill anyone, if they want to kill themselves let them kill themselves.If they want to kill you, and considering we are all connected through action in one manner or another, let them kill themselves. This is considering to kill another is to kill oneself.If you want to kill them, you are killing yourself.

    Justin trudeau is that you?News for you pall:1) we are not conected, i didnt even knew you existed and if you stop existing i woldnt give a crap.2) GOD IS NOT REAL.If someone kills you, you die, end of history.

    That’s nice. Considering you just responded to my point with another point, my point is proven.
    So God is not real, okay, considering one definition of God is “ALL” you may want to start negating everything right now…it may take a while to negate infinity.
    So I die, my deteriorated body does not provide the foundation for further organisms?

    I already did, all eternity is nothing, what is time? What does time means?
    We need to measure things but in 1 billion years it wont matter.

    Ir doesnt matter.

    To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

    #879615
    +1
    Carnage
    Carnage
    Participant
    22113

    The universe is ruled by kaos, desorder, enthropy and a power struggle between the gravity of planets, the sun, known matter ans dark matter, atoms clash and change electrons constanly, molecules are formed and destroyed constantly, energy change from one state to another, things bind and ceparate in an futile effort to stay in a stable form a little longer, like you breath and eat a

    Is this argument chaotic?
    If electrons exist through continually infinite variation do electrons really change?

    They change from the electron owning them, energy cant be destroyed einstein said, only trasformed, but people like you use the idea to signify inmortality, becouse of FEAR, Fear of death, “i will keep going in a flower” “we all conected” bla bla bla, GOD, bla, bla.

    One day it will be over, you will die, the sun will die, become a white midget star, its gravity will increase, it will draw and consume our solar sistem, collapse on it own nucleus maybe a black hole? Who knows, who cares, in 50 we all will be dead and this conversation will be as pointless as human existance.

    It is all a big BLUHHHH.

    To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

    #879621
    +3

    Anonymous
    1

    The Golden Rule follows from Natural Law:

    For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

    If you go about causing negative actions you can expect some blowback. This is also called Karma. You can’t cheat nature. Nothing is free.

    #879626
    John Doe
    John Doe
    Participant
    743

    The universe is ruled by kaos, desorder, enthropy and a power struggle between the gravity of planets, the sun, known matter ans dark matter, atoms clash and change electrons constanly, molecules are formed and destroyed constantly, energy change from one state to another, things bind and ceparate in an futile effort to stay in a stable form a little longer, like you breath and eat a

    Is this argument chaotic?If electrons exist through continually infinite variation do electrons really change?

    They change from the electron owning them, energy cant be destroyed einstein said, only trasformed, but people like you use the idea to signify inmortality, becouse of FEAR, Fear of death, “i will keep going in a flower” “we all conected” bla bla bla, GOD, bla, bla.
    One day it will be over, you will die, the sun will die, become a white midget star, its gravity will increase, it will draw and consume our solar sistem, collapse on it own nucleus maybe a black hole? Who knows, who cares, in 50 we all will be dead and this conversation will be as pointless as human existance.
    It is all a big BLUHHHH.

    And how do you know it is all fear?

    #879631
    +1
    IMickey503
    iMickey503
    Participant
    12465

    For at least 20 years, I have looked at the meaning of life. And if the golden rule was true, then why do so many bad people do so well?

    If there was a geometric association to your life, then just like Quantum theory the variables and even the very geometry can be changed.

    Now is there a god? Sure their is. He exists when you think about it. The simpleton answer is that once you are there to observe, the particles for some reason behave differently.

    Now here is what gets me. People say that god does indeed exist. THen you have to okay with the fact that he does not care about you, and that you are just apart of a larger higher organism that is actually the one that god gives preference to.

    I live by the golden rule as well. Just remember, the golden rule has a dark side. Those that grow with rules and then they are broken are never left with any other choice but to destroy since that is the basis of the golden rule. You can not have one without the other.

    Hence, why the bible was RE-Written to be all Forgiveness and s~~~ from the old testament to the new one.

    And about fear. If you truly believed in god, then why is this not the norm.

    You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 34 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.