I believe feminism from its infancy was designed and promoted strictly for economic reasons, however was masked through emotional language so that it will be accepted by the masses. It goal is not to bring about equality but rather change the dynamics in the workforce. This change in dynamics is to help a neo feudalistic type of state where the majority of workers are slaves or serfs.
With the invention of feminism, women came into a workforce previously dominated by men. With a male only workforce, many men would expect enough wages to maintain a family or help in their responsibility of providing for someone else. If these wage requirements were not met then strikes, protests, or violent measures would come about.
Once women entered the workforce the value of the male worker went down even further since the advent of industrialization. The value went down because now men did not hold the sway they once did in the work place. This lack of influence took place for several reasons. Women employees are more likely to submit to bosses demands and sacrifice more for the company due to a misplaced and misused maternal instinct. They will not and essentially cannot standup for themselves if the conditions become too abusive. Management, in the interest of keeping profits, placed value on female workers because of this.
Unfortunately I don’t have the link, but I have seen in a documentary about China’s factories, that management prefers to hire women simply because they listen to their superiors better and will not respond violently to any increase in demands placed on them. They openly admitted this.
In other words, women make better slaves.
Their role in the workforce also changed their position in society. Where once motherhood was designed to help with the raising of a family, it was and is put towards the raising of a corporation. Instead of an infant, a dollar bill now nurses at the breasts of most women. With women spending most of their time at work, many do not start families. As a result that maternal instinct takes a snowball effect and is placed onto the company instead. A loyal unquestioning drone takes the place of the average worker.
The ability to bring home a paycheck dramatically altered the structure of male/female dynamics. Where before the man brought home the paycheck and was therefore responsible for it, women have taken that power onto themselves. Add the constant bombardment of advertising directed towards them, along the weaker nature of the woman in general, and you end up seeing most of that paycheck being spent on her desires or what she is told to spend it on. (for statistics about women and the economy click here http://she-conomy.com/facts-on-women)
With economic power shifting towards women in both the economy and the work place, men of the future are left with little. With a corporate state in charge of most economic activity I believe men will split into two groups. Either a highly submissive almost feminine type of slave labor, or violent cast outs who are always having altercations with a law heavily influenced by its corporate superiors.
pardon the edits, I am really rusty.
Puffin Stuff 5 years, 1 month ago.
