The Gini Coefficient and the effects on society.

Topic by Cataphract

Cataphract

Home Forums Political Corner The Gini Coefficient and the effects on society.

This topic contains 5 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by Cataphract  Cataphract 2 years, 9 months ago.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #470159
    +1
    Cataphract
    Cataphract
    Participant
    2656

    The MGTOW subreddit might be repetitive at times but occasionally you can still find some quality truth nuggets like the one below:

    The Gini Coefficient is a measure of Male to Male inequality and is a CAUSAL factor in societal violence. Psychologists have proven this. What it means is that when there is RELATIVE poverty between young males(read male to male inequality), violence is certain to emerge, female inequality actually has little repercussions on society.

    Firstly, Left wing/female voters unmistakably cause this when they invite immigrants in who are actually MORE likely to be violent in their new developed country than their old country regardless of religion because of the Gini Coefficient.

    Why? Because back in their old countries, everyone is poor. Thus, the relative poverty is non-existent and men are less likely to be violent towards each other. Yes immigrant “X” is in poverty but so is immigrant “Y”.There is no relative poverty between them and no need for them to kill each other. There is nothing to gain.

    However, When they invite immigrant “x” in and he is living next to computer scientist citizen “Z”, immigrant “x” now has a high Gini Coefficient between him and citizen “Z” and thus has a proven biological motivation to kill him a la the Gini Coefficient. His instinctual brain tells him that he will get “Z”‘s access to women if he kills “Z”.

    Now onto the more immediate female cause of a rising Gini Coefficient in the west – feminism and female equality.

    When females displace males at high status jobs, they automatically cause more lower class males who are still living right next to higher class males with no more non-violent way to increase their status. There’s now less good jobs for men. Thus, the Gini Coefficient rises, the lower class males figure, “F~~~ it. My only chance to win is if I take these people out” and thus the violence continues.

    What’s also interesting is that the violence seems to be avoidable when men have a reasonable way to rise without violence. However, by inviting in immigrants with no marketable skills and systematically eliminating men from high status jobs, the consolidate the power of the Gini Coefficient and ensure that violence will erupt when swaths of men have no non-violent way to progress.

    Great job ladies.

    Hofstra publication on Gini Coefficient https://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/methods/ch4m1en.html

    Marriage: About as appealing as wood-chipper diving.

    #470171
    +1
    Hmskl'd
    hmskl’d
    Participant
    6410

    His instinctual brain tells him that he will get “Z”‘s access to women if he kills “Z”.

    My instinct tells me to do whatever I can, nonviolently, but with much determination .. to avoid Z’s women. They are all Awalts.

    #470173
    +1
    Faust For Science
    Faust For Science
    Participant
    22538

    When females displace males at high status jobs, they automatically cause more lower class males who are still living right next to higher class males with no more non-violent way to increase their status. There’s now less good jobs for men. Thus, the Gini Coefficient rises, the lower class males figure, “F~~~ it. My only chance to win is if I take these people out” and thus the violence continues.

    MGTOW invalidates the “Gini Coefficient”.

    Much of MGTOW membership are minimalists. We do not mind being lower class as long as we have enough money to live comfortably in our small homes and with our hobbies to keep us busy.

    I did some digging. It was not hard. But, you are likely going to be shocked at what I found about the origins of the “Gini Coefficient”.

    What I found points that the “Gini Coefficient” is a junk science product of eugenics theories. The “Gini Coefficient” tries to justify removing men not wanted by society from society.

    The “Gini Coefficient” was invented by the Italian, Corrado Gini (May 23, 1884 – March 13, 1965). Carroda Gini supported fascism and the nazis. Corrado Gini was friends with Benito Mussolini. Yes. That Mussolini: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corrado_Gini

    Corrado Gini was a strong supporter of eugenics.

    In 1993, Corrado Gina founded Latin International Federation of Eugenics Organizations, which was a splinter group of the International Federation of Eugenics Organizations: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Federation_of_Eugenics_Organizations

    Cataphract, I am sure you did not realize you were posting eugenics propaganda created a fascist whom supported the nazis. Consider this a lesson to better source your material before posting.

    #470289
    +1
    FrankOne
    FrankOne
    Participant
    1420

    I don’t buy it. I live in a working class neighborhood (suburb). Very little violence. If I go to the urban core, there is MUCH violence and crime. This isn’t because there is a rich doctor living down the street from the urban poor. And they [urban poor young men of ALL races] aren’t killing the rich doctor; they’re killing each other over turf, drugs, etc.

    It’s because they haven’t been educated and socialized properly. This has been ENABLED by government handouts and social policies, the lack of stigma on not being able to SUPPORT yourself as an adult, and many other factors, including the drug war leading to incarcerating a large percentage of poor young men.

    I’m all for immigrants; especially H1B/technical — they start companies and innovate, creating jobs, growing the economy. The only immigrants I DON’T like are the ones who take in more government benefits than they pay in taxes and fail to assimilate. Unfortunately, many of the ‘political refugees’ in the urban area I reside in, fit into this category, but it’s problematic to generalize about ‘all immigrants’.

    Fewer higher paying jobs because women are taking them? Maybe there are too many Jews, Chinese or Indians taking those high paying jobs too, so they should be excluded too because they aren’t white males? Hardly. Economics isn’t a zero sum game. Just as if you have more MEN in a population, you will have more consumers and more demand for goods & services, you will thus have higher LABOR requirements. Similarly, when women consume they must pay and earn money to consume. Women are COMPETING for jobs — at least in the private sector.

    #470313
    FunInTheSun
    FunInTheSun
    Participant
    8283

    Instead of using violence, why not get a job?

    Or get two jobs and then save up some money for a trade school?

    That seems like a better way to live than to commit a crime and spend decades rotting in a prison.

    "I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

    #470317
    +2
    Cataphract
    Cataphract
    Participant
    2656

    I guess this shows that I have a lot to learn, should have fact checked this, made the same mistake that many of today’s journalists make.

    Marriage: About as appealing as wood-chipper diving.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.