The Future

[Wolfgang RyderSpectator 70]

Little by little, the birth rate worldwide is diminishing as time passes by. Here in Brazil, it’s been 4 years since the last time the census measured the birth rate. It’s been 1,81 births per woman. In the 1960’s, the birth rate was 6,21 births per woman and has been decreasing since then. In the US, it used to be 3,65 birth per woman (as of 1960) and now it is 1,88 births per woman (as of 2012).

The divorce rate in Brazil has grown to 161% in one decade (even though 85,1% of custodies ends up with women) which means that marriage in this country became a waste of money and time (we all know this but here things are more explicit). Most of the marriages don’t reach the 15th anniversary.

But I don’t think Brazil is the only example. Most of the countries worldwide have their birth rates drastically decreasing and divorce rates drastically increasing.

What’s the meaning of this?

Let’s imagine if most of countries follow the example of Brazil. Even better: Imagine if most of the countries have the birth rate equivalent of Brazil (1,81) or China (1,66) and the population rate equivalent of Australia (23 million) and the divorce rate equivalent of Brazil (161%).

You know what this means?

Men and women are falling apart. Soon, the Earth population will decrease and in a not so very far future we’ll be in situation which we will have to chose between:

Restore the birth rate or let it decrease more

Marriage has finally shown its true face (at least to us) and the family masquerade is no longer a reason to keep going on and breeding like some wild rabbits.

This obviously has nothing to do with MGTOW but more to do with people refusing to cope with their government dirty deeds.

What are your thoughts about this?

How do you imagine the future?

What do you expect from this future society?

[Anonymous 42]

Children come from women, women are ruined, who gives a f~~~ past ruined women?

You only get one life to live why waste it serving women just for a slap in the face? Mankind can go extinct for all I care!

[TuneoutParticipant]

Meh, the world is overpopulated anyway,needs a thinning out.

Maybe by that time Govt’s will pay a man & woman to have sex and then that child will be raised by the state.

Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!

[RoyDalParticipant]

Tuneout wrote:

Maybe by that time Govt’s will pay a man & woman to have sex and then that child will be raised by the state.

This is happening already!

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

The birth rate in developed countries like the U.S. and Europe is declining. I’d like to think that the declining birth rates is due to men not marrying or fathering kids but that’s not yet the case. Japan’s birth rate is incredibly low. Maybe because Japanese businessmen work such long hours and get drunk after work they don’t have much energy for sex.
Seriously, with the increased emphasis on careers and climbing the corporate ladder there is not much energy left for anything else, let alone raising kids.
On the other hand, birth rates in 3rd world countries continue to grow so the world population keeps going up. We will soon run out of natural resources, including drinking water and there will someday be wars fought over this.
Christopher Hitchens took a brave and unpopular stance against the popularity of Mother Theresa by pointing out in his book, “Missionary Position” that she was partly responsible for the overpopulation and poverty in India by preaching against birth control. A must read.

[Blue SkiesParticipant 15665]

here’s my 2 cents

the world has limited resources so a decreasing populations due to low birthrates is a good thing.

MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Wolfgang Ryder wrote:

How do you imagine the future?

• Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner won a medal for “courage” for dressing in drag. The last time he got a medal, had to be the fastest MAN in the world.

• Hillary Clinton running for PRESIDENT and commander and chief of the ARMY?

• Kim Kardashian held up as an example of CELEBRITY with no skills or talent to speak of?

“The future” is cancelled.
Save yourselves.

And have a nice weekend.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[SandalsParticipant 4253]

Keymaster wrote:

Wolfgang Ryder wrote:

How do you imagine the future?

• Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner won a medal for “courage” for dressing in drag. The last time he got a medal, had to be the fastest MAN in the world.

• Hillary Clinton running for PRESIDENT and commander and chief of the ARMY?

• Kim Kardashian held up as an example of CELEBRITY with no skills or talent to speak of?

“The future” is cancelled.
Save yourselves.

And have a nice weekend.

That may be the most profound thing I have ever heard. Quite liberating, actually.

[GnosticParticipant 2491]

Declining birthrate is good for the people, but bad for the government.

We have less people competing for resources in the future so the next generation will have higher pay vs living cost.

Government will have less tax, and less slaves.

Why should we be brainwash to think what is bad for the government is bad for us? Imagine what our wages vs living cost now if our population become 1/100.

There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

[BoarParticipant]

I am still expecting the next global war to take care of the overpopulation. Where it will come from, who knows? Grenada has been very quiet lately….I wonder what is going on there….

Untamed wrote: Quit complaining and Go Your Own Way in whatever manner suits you best.

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

Gnostic wrote:

Declining birthrate is good for the people, but bad for the government.

We have less people competing for resources in the future so the next generation will have higher pay vs living cost.

Government will have less tax, and less slaves.

Why should we be brainwash to think what is bad for the government is bad for us? Imagine what our wages vs living cost now if our population become 1/100.

With higher wages there will be more money for taxes.
Even if there is less money for the government that means there will be less money for defense, police and maintaining infrastructure.
What’s bad for the government is bad for us.
The government is whoever we elect. The alternative is anarchy.

[GnosticParticipant 2491]

bobphilo wrote:

Gnostic wrote:

Declining birthrate is good for the people, but bad for the government.

We have less people competing for resources in the future so the next generation will have higher pay vs living cost.

Government will have less tax, and less slaves.

Why should we be brainwash to think what is bad for the government is bad for us? Imagine what our wages vs living cost now if our population become 1/100.

With higher wages there will be more money for taxes.
Even if there is less money for the government that means there will be less money for defense, police and maintaining infrastructure.
What’s bad for the government is bad for us.
The government is whoever we elect. The alternative is anarchy.

The keyword here is wages vs living cost. Not higher wages.
With more resources vs population, and there are less people demanding goods while there are more goods. Hence supply vs demand tip to the other balance.

Higher wages is meaningless on its own, because more wages = more buying power = price drive up by demand. And the never ending loop happens. The housing prices keep jacking up because more people buy and land are scarce, in the big cities. But if the population become 1/100, there are more land to go around = more supply vs demand = living cost go down.

Less money for defense, police and infrastructure?
If you have less people, why do you need so much defense, police and infrastructure? Besides does the police protect me against false rape / domestic violence accusation?

Besides, so call “defense” only benefit the elites and politicians, what has that to do with the average citizen? We don’t get money from our “defense” occupying resource rich country.

What “defense” really mean is I can use the tax of our citizens to build a bigger “defense” then use that “defense” to take over some resource rich country and profits from that resource will go in my coffers directly. What, you filthy peasant want a share of the bonus our “defense” earn for us?

There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

[UintatheriumParticipant 1861]

If the birth rate is declining, then … well … good!

In the future, everyone will have more personal space and there will be more room for the manliest thing ever: wild nature.

The declining birth rate is a good thing. The world currently has over 7 billion people in it. That isn’t natural.

I’m just glad that the birth rate will decline without any authoritarian population control program. This means that wild nature will eventually be restored without any need for state environmentalism.

The birth rate will decline even more if men boycott sperm banks. Women who need sperm donations don’t deserve them. That isn’t even a statistic.

MGTOW: because you can (and should) say anything about a woman as long as she isn't within earshot

[RennieParticipant]

The future is going to be bad. It’s going to be chaos and anarchy, since people will be doing whatever they want, without any regard for others.

Think killing someone over a chocolate bar kind of stuff – it happens today, but most people don’t do that. However in the future most people will be doing stuff like that. Free for all/law of the jungle.

I hope I don’t live to see this ugly future, but I’m not counting on it.

As for the birth rate I could care less. I won’t be around to see the end game of it anyways.

[UintatheriumParticipant 1861]

Rennie wrote:

The future is going to be bad. It’s going to be chaos and anarchy, since people will be doing whatever they want, without any regard for others.

Think killing someone over a chocolate bar kind of stuff – it happens today, but most people don’t do that. However in the future most people will be doing stuff like that. Free for all/law of the jungle.

I hope I don’t live to see this ugly future, but I’m not counting on it.

As for the birth rate I could care less. I won’t be around to see the end game of it anyways.

I respectfully disagree.

When you can get arrested for “misgendering” someone, you aren’t living in an anarchy. You’re living in the exact opposite.

MGTOW: because you can (and should) say anything about a woman as long as she isn't within earshot

[RennieParticipant]

Uintatherium wrote:

Rennie wrote:

The future is going to be bad. It’s going to be chaos and anarchy, since people will be doing whatever they want, without any regard for others.

Think killing someone over a chocolate bar kind of stuff – it happens today, but most people don’t do that. However in the future most people will be doing stuff like that. Free for all/law of the jungle.

I hope I don’t live to see this ugly future, but I’m not counting on it.

As for the birth rate I could care less. I won’t be around to see the end game of it anyways.

I respectfully disagree.

When you can get arrested for “misgendering” someone, you aren’t living in an anarchy. You’re living in the exact opposite.

We’re not there yet. This is probably somewhere between 25-50 years down the road in the future.

[Author]

Posts