The Class of KM and MGTOW

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Meh wrote:

Strong disagreement here. Hysterics and emotional responses are no example of intelligence,

That’s inaccurate. You know what you get in the real world when you’re a MAN and you have a “strong emotional response”???

BLANK STARES.

When a man is unjustly mistreated, he has a RIGHT to an “emotional response”. When a false accusation is brought against you , you can respond with pure unrestrained outrage. You’re not required to put up with that s~~~. Saying an “emotional responses are no example of intelligence” is flatly inaccurate and this is one place we WILL allow it — where others won’t. Men are NOT REQUIRED to take s~~~ quietly while sitting down. The REST of the world is telling him that already. To tell him that an “emotional response is not a sign of intelligence” is just shaming of another sort. It’s not even true. He IS permitted.

When I KNOW – beyond the shadow of a doubt – that “the world is F~~~ING ROUND” and you tell me that it’s FLAT….. I’m gonna get P~~~ED because you’re expecting me to believe you. You don’t get to say “an emotional response is not a sign of intelligence”. It just doesn’t work.

I had a boss like that once. He simply said s~~~ that was NOT TRUE. And when I got emphatic about showing him how he was wrong….. he said “you’re getting emotional now”. I didn’t permit him to get away with it. Because he can’t.

Many of the greatest minds that ever existed were extremely passionate in their delivery. Start with Mozart if you want. When he was told by others who didn’t write, play, or read music that he had “too many notes”….. he reacted over-emotionally – because he knew better. An emotional response is just easily coming from someone MORE intelligent.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[MehParticipant 77]

Your opinion in this case. As far as I see it, the most inhuman things in human history were done by people, who were easily offended and took their torches and pitchforks out. Politically correctivism, feminism and gender studies are based on feelings, not rational thoughts.
So excuse me, if I can NOT agree to one bit of what you said.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Meh wrote:

Your opinion in this case.

It’s not a personal opinion. And we can prove it. When I repeatedly tell, you “the sky is pink” and maintain that’s it’s a FACT and I now attempt to force you to accept it or else you will be arrested or detained…. are you telling me that you would have no emotional reaction to this? That it would be unreasonable? And even though you know the sky is blue – because it f~~~ing is – you are going to just accept the statement “you’re not more intelligent because you reacted emotionally”?

Please stop. That tickles.

Implying “an emotional reaction is not a sign of intelligence” is a true statement.
It’s just as true as “”an emotional reaction is not a sign of stupidity”.

An emotional reaction plays absolutely no role in the merit of an argument at all. Shaming someone for an “emotional reaction” as some basis for being right or wrong FAILS.

Meh wrote:

So excuse me, if I can NOT agree to one bit of what you said.

A sarcastic apology for disagreeing was never required. Neither is a sincere one.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

Since speaking freely seems to be a reason for ban or warnings on here,

Would it be appropriate if I add a grain of gravitas here?

You do realize that the mere LOOKING at PICTURES of under-age children in a sexual nature is a F~~~ING felony do you not?

Excuse me, I thought I was on a site about MEN discussing MANLY s~~~; not f~~~ing NAMBLA .

If I found myself in the wrong room, by all means show me the F~~~ING DOOR. What, are you a f~~~ing pedophile? You want to embrace “thinking and desiring CHILDREN as sexual objects” is ok?

Well f~~~ me running, Im out’a here! Again- thats a f~~~ing felony you sick piece of s~~~! And yes: just the mere viewing of pictures of such is a f~~~ing crime. Are you from some third world country? You dont know this s~~~?

Last I checked Men Going Their Own Way did NOT involve the sexualisation of CHILDREN.

Is ANYONE here NOT unanimously onboard with rejecting that – whether in thought or deed?

Do some of you REALLY think that lusting after pre-pubecent CHILDREN in a sexual manner is ok?

Lets take a f~~~ing poll: anyone cool with SEXUALLY LUSTING AFTER A CHILD PLEASE REPLY

Resident cynic.

[Just a ManParticipant 934]

This whole thing became convoluted. I tried reading the original, before seeing any of this as I read from oldest to newest. The thread itself confused me, since the ONE PERSON, whom this is about and who made the comment, had his post deleted. I had a hard time figuring out wtf was going on. Then I came across another thread, without the ONE PERSON saying anything in it(as near as I could tell), apparently already banned?, but two other folks going at each others throats. Now this thread appears to be the third thread and yet more of you are attacking each other without the ONE PERSON saying anything here either.
As near as I can tell, only ONE PERSON said anything pro pedophile(not even sure of that since I could not read the whole thing) and they were deleted, everyone else just did like the media tells them and started attacking each other. I was pretty sure this site was where the intelligent can go to converse and share and whatnot. You know, men’s things, but attacking third parties over a first parties original post is insane. It is called Free Speech and all you angry folks had to do was NOT read it or comment and you FAILED.
Now I’m p~~~ed off at the whole f~~~ing lot of you for being hypocrites. Right or wrong, black or white, yin or yang knock that s~~~ off! Now everyone apologize, shake hands and realize we are all different. Then go have a damn beer, sheesh.

Philosophy, the female repellent

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Meh wrote:

Since speaking freely seems to be a reason for ban or warnings on here

“Seems?” If it seems that way to you, please provide one example…. where “speaking freely” was the reason for a ban.

Meh wrote:

I am aware that i am worthy of banning now

You’re going to have to do much more than that. Hell, you could even speak freely and say “Keymaster sucks dicks” and I STILL wouldn’t ban you. Can prove that too. Even “my little Brony” wasn’t banned. He was just reduced to spectator. But if you typed “I am a woman” that would certainly do it.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

As near as I can tell, only ONE PERSON said anything pro pedophile

Its a tad bit more complicated than that. Several people expressed the idea that if anyone is AGAINST someones lust for a child than they were essentially “thought police”.

So ya, theres that. It kind of struck a nerve, one might say.

Resident cynic.

[Anonymous 42]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

Do some of you REALLY think that lusting after pre-pubecent CHILDREN in a sexual manner is ok?

Ask the FBI, I sent them email spam pictures years ago, I was F~~~ing victimized! Nearly destroyed my computer I was so f~~~ing mad! My emotions that day (unleashed) I would have been pounding that f~~~s face into mud! The only pedophilia I ever viewed was not by my will! but those images of little girls riding bicycles topless are burned into my brain! Even today I want to pound those f~~~s till their blood mud! I ask GOD to burn them in hell, sooner rather than later!

Ancientwisdom wrote:

Lets take a f~~~ing poll: anyone cool with SEXUALLY LUSTING AFTER A CHILD PLEASE REPLY

Children are SACRED, if we don’t protect them, who will?

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

Since speaking freely seems to be a reason for ban or warnings on here,

Lets take care of this once and for all…

So, you consider the notion of NOT discussing CHILD RAPE as an infringement on your free speach? What is the reductio ad absurdum of your view? Would you also insist on: plotting, planning robbery, rape, and murder?

Please, please do tell us WHEN we are infringing on your ‘RIGHTS’ and how we can better accomodate you.

Youre upset people dont want to entertain thoughts of PEDOPHILIA online? How DARE anyone infringe upon your fellonous mind!

Anything else you would like to discuss? Planning on some domestic abuse? Perhaps we can create a condusive environment for you to discuss it. Beastiality? God forbid we stop you from speaking of it.

How else is this forum prohibiting you from discussing perverted FELONIES?

Do tell….do tell.

Resident cynic.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Phantom wrote:

How about we just do some shots of whiskey together instead bro?

That’s an excellent idea.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 11]

This site has made me a better man period and end of story.

I stirred the pot up pretty badly today.

@AW: Your passionate defense of children is a testament to MGTOW.

[PhantomParticipant 3328]

Keymaster wrote:

That’s an excellent idea.

“clink” Bottom’s Up

🙂

Edit: Jack Daniel’s, but your beverage may vary 😛

[HitmanParticipant]

Thank god that brony.is out..f~~~ him and the horse he rode in on ! BEASTIALITY PUN INTENDED.! Guys ..we are men here..it’s o.k. If tempers flare..I feel free to speak my truths here..like nowhere else..now where’d I put that damn vodka so I can join the toast !..well deserved by ALL !

[Author]

Posts