The Bachelor Tax

[RhinoParticipant 3477]

The government will always find ways to conceal gender discrimination because if they came out and did it like in 1921 it would get struck down.

In 1921, the state of Montana applied a $3 tax on all bachelors in the state.[13] One of them, William Atzinger, refused to pay on sex discrimination grounds.[14] On January 11, 1922, the state supreme court struck down the “bachelor tax” and another poll tax applicable only to men.[15][16] However, it was done so on the grounds that the Montanan constitution of 1889 did not grant the legislature the power to tax individual persons; and attempts to define it as a policing measure for matters of public health as opposed to a revenue measure were found invalid.[13]

There will always be a lawyer out to make a buck and will fight this not because of principle but to get paid so the government has to be sneaky like some have mentioned in regards to the discrimination found in Obama Care.

[RedDawnParticipant 1391]

sidecar wrote:

It’s cheaper to pay a bachelor tax than marrying some slore and getting raped in divorce court. But it would be cheaper still to find some other frugal bachelor and set up a sham “gay marriage” so you both avoid paying the tax.

Problem solved.

It would be like a hetero marriage, sexless.

Courage is the key to life itself - Morgan Freeman

[Dr. SableParticipant 1064]

If I had to pay bachelor tax I would not care unless it seriously undermined my net income.
We pay so many indirect taxes as it is anyhow, so what difference does it make in the end.
When you know you are being screwed it’s up to you to minimize its effects. That is what men do,
unlike the lazy females who run to big daddy to fix problems of their own making.

Zero Tolerance

[VarunParticipant 2981]

Anonymous wrote:

Some of us were always going to be MGTOW no matter what, it’s genetic on our parts and we don’t choose it, we are born that way.
I’m MGTOW because I value freedom and have never particularly liked women and their BS. Even without the laws the way they are, it would always have been difficult for me to have been a blue pill man.

I am one of those too; even if there were no men’s issues, I’d still find it hard to marry up like a normal blue pill man. But my reason would have been more in the lines of confusion, awkwardness, out-of-place-emotions and nescience when relating to womenkind.

MOWsince95 wrote:

When it’s time to pay just say you “identify as a woman” and the bureaucrat s~~~heads have to accept that.

That is, by far, the smartest answer I’ve read till now. Yes.. in this day and age when you can prove that there can be more than a thousand genders, I don’t see why somebody can’t get away with that.

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

[Author]

Posts