Supreme Court, MSM trying to normalize Pedophila and Human Trafficking

Topic by Rhino

Rhino

Home Forums Political Corner Supreme Court, MSM trying to normalize Pedophila and Human Trafficking

This topic contains 8 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by Jake  Jake 1 year, 6 months ago.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #835672
    +8
    Rhino
    Rhino
    Participant
    3477

    Did you guys know that the media is starting to normalize pedophilia? The reason for this is because soon people are going to find out that many people in power in the government and Hollywood were pedophiles and worse. Here is an example of this: link.

    Supreme Court link.

    Supreme court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is currently a sitting justice on the Supreme Court. Link.

    In 1977 when Ginsburg was General Counsel of the ACLU, she co-authored (with Brenda Feigen-Fasteau) Sex Bias in the U.S. Code: A Report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which was published by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights in April 1977, for which Ginsburg and Feigen-Fasteau were paid with federal funds under Contract No. CR3AK010.

    On p. 102 of Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, under the sub-heading “Recommendations,” Ginsburg and Feigen-Fasteau recommend a revision of 18 U.S.C. §2032 from “carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife who has not attained the age of sixteen years” to “A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, not his spouse, and . . . the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old“. Below is the pertinent paragraph:

    18 U.S.C. §2032 — Eliminate the phrase “carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife who has not attained the age of sixteen years” and substitute a Federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense patterned after S. 1400 §1633: A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, not his spouse, and (1) compels the other person to participate: (A) by force or (B) by threatening or placing the other person in fear that any person will imminently be subjected to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping; (2) has substantially impaired the other person’s power to appraise or control the conduct by administering or employing a drug or intoxicant without the knowledge or against the will of such other person, or by other means; or (3) the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old.

    Ginsburg (and her co-author) also recommends that the Mann Act be repealed. The Mann Act is a federal law passed in 1910 which makes it a felony to engage in interstate or foreign commerce transport of “any woman or girl for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose”.

    From Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, pp. 98-99:

    The Mann Act . . . poses the invasion of privacy issue in an acute form. The Mann Act also is offensive because of the image of women it perpetuates . . . . It was meant to protect from ‘the villainous interstate and international traffic in women and girls,’ ‘those women and girls who, if given a fair chance, would, in all human probability, have been good wives and mothers and useful citizens. . . .’

    In other words, if Ruth Bader Ginsburg has her way, sexual abuse of children 12-years or older would not be a crime, nor would child sex trafficking.

    Ginsburg will be 84 next month. May President Trump be given the opportunity to nominate her replacement on the Supreme Court.

    This is why Trump signed the Executive Order on Human trafficking he knows what the elites are up to and the media is complicit in trying to normalize and cover the evil deep state tracks. Watch in the next year more news on this topic.

    #843318
    +5
    PistolPete
    PistolPete
    Participant
    27143

    Very good research job Rhino and I think you are right on point. They are normalizing pedophilia in the same manner and following the same strategy used to normalize homosexuality.

    Step 1 de-criminalize,
    Step 2 remove any mention of harm,
    Step 3 “show empathy” because its just a personal choice,
    Step 4 Shut down criticism of it,
    Step 5 criminalize anyone critical as “hate” mongers. i.e. we’ve come full circle.

    #843322
    +1
    Jim01
    Jim01
    Participant
    6678

    I read that the guy who played Chekov in the crap Star Trek reboot films was going to come out and expose a load of peados in Hollywood – next thing he gets run over by his own car…

    #843329

    Anonymous
    42

    Oh good! I can become an aspiring dirty old man!

    #843345
    +2
    Solid
    Solid
    Participant
    7520

    Very good research job Rhino and I think you are right on point. They are normalizing pedophilia in the same manner and following the same strategy used to normalize homosexuality.

    Step 1 de-criminalize,
    Step 2 remove any mention of harm,
    Step 3 “show empathy” because its just a personal choice,
    Step 4 Shut down criticism of it,
    Step 5 criminalize anyone critical as “hate” mongers. i.e. we’ve come full circle.

    Their agenda has two sides. Any prohibited content is exploited online to create “evidence” to arrest anyone of interest. Someone for example can include a image in a post with pedophile content, it will be downloaded by anyone who opens the post, will be stored on your local cache. This is enough reason to put you in jail here. Even if the image doesn’t render in your browser and you don’t see a thing, is possible to force it to download silently for the local cache, so in an investigation, it will show up.

    My bet is, they will use this tactic to put some men in trouble, so people will fear being victims of a “false pedophilia claim”, and will push harder to decriminalize it. May be some paranoia in my head, but if we analyze the metoo and those false claims, I won’t expect anything different to happens in this scenario.

    #843371
    +1
    The man in the mountain
    The man in the mountain
    Participant
    4102

    Rhino you tell it like it is brother, sadly we have come to this but i expected this would happen when all of those women who were teachers raped their students, all the while only getting a slap on the wrist for doing something that if men did it they would spend at least 20 years in jail.

    #843377
    Carnage
    Carnage
    Participant
    22113

    And?

    Are you a kid?
    Are you a women?

    No?

    Then why give a f~~~?

    They can take all the wimin and little f~~~s and f~~~ them to death with a jack hammer I DONT GIVE A F~~~.

    To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

    #843405
    +2

    Anonymous
    3

    Even if the image doesn’t render in your browser and you don’t see a thing, is possible to force it to download silently for the local cache, so in an investigation, it will show up.

    The security of everything people use, is almost a bad joke. Everything can be hacked, have backdoors, tricks, or simply leave data traces behind (like those f~~~ing cookies and cache and all “tracking mechanisms” on sites. In fact, even if one would browse web from a live CD read only system and no other storage, computer and user could be still tracked by canvas fingerprinting, mac address, ip address, dns queries, all network side stuff, and content can be viewed by man in the middle attacks also known as “SSL inspection” (that won’t show security alarm, any CA (“authority” of https certificates) can be forced by government, and it can issue certificate for any page…)

    All what we use is inherently flawed on so many levels…

    #843560
    Jake
    Jake
    Participant
    908

    no biggy just shoot them and their backer

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.