Home › Forums › Political Corner › Supreme Court, MSM trying to normalize Pedophila and Human Trafficking
This topic contains 8 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by Jake 1 year, 6 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Did you guys know that the media is starting to normalize pedophilia? The reason for this is because soon people are going to find out that many people in power in the government and Hollywood were pedophiles and worse. Here is an example of this: link.
Supreme Court link.
Supreme court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is currently a sitting justice on the Supreme Court. Link.
In 1977 when Ginsburg was General Counsel of the ACLU, she co-authored (with Brenda Feigen-Fasteau) Sex Bias in the U.S. Code: A Report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which was published by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights in April 1977, for which Ginsburg and Feigen-Fasteau were paid with federal funds under Contract No. CR3AK010.
On p. 102 of Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, under the sub-heading “Recommendations,” Ginsburg and Feigen-Fasteau recommend a revision of 18 U.S.C. §2032 from “carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife who has not attained the age of sixteen years” to “A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, not his spouse, and . . . the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old“. Below is the pertinent paragraph:
18 U.S.C. §2032 — Eliminate the phrase “carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife who has not attained the age of sixteen years” and substitute a Federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense patterned after S. 1400 §1633: A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, not his spouse, and (1) compels the other person to participate: (A) by force or (B) by threatening or placing the other person in fear that any person will imminently be subjected to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping; (2) has substantially impaired the other person’s power to appraise or control the conduct by administering or employing a drug or intoxicant without the knowledge or against the will of such other person, or by other means; or (3) the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old.
Ginsburg (and her co-author) also recommends that the Mann Act be repealed. The Mann Act is a federal law passed in 1910 which makes it a felony to engage in interstate or foreign commerce transport of “any woman or girl for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose”.
From Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, pp. 98-99:
The Mann Act . . . poses the invasion of privacy issue in an acute form. The Mann Act also is offensive because of the image of women it perpetuates . . . . It was meant to protect from ‘the villainous interstate and international traffic in women and girls,’ ‘those women and girls who, if given a fair chance, would, in all human probability, have been good wives and mothers and useful citizens. . . .’
In other words, if Ruth Bader Ginsburg has her way, sexual abuse of children 12-years or older would not be a crime, nor would child sex trafficking.
Ginsburg will be 84 next month. May President Trump be given the opportunity to nominate her replacement on the Supreme Court.
This is why Trump signed the Executive Order on Human trafficking he knows what the elites are up to and the media is complicit in trying to normalize and cover the evil deep state tracks. Watch in the next year more news on this topic.
Very good research job Rhino and I think you are right on point. They are normalizing pedophilia in the same manner and following the same strategy used to normalize homosexuality.
Step 1 de-criminalize,
Step 2 remove any mention of harm,
Step 3 “show empathy” because its just a personal choice,
Step 4 Shut down criticism of it,
Step 5 criminalize anyone critical as “hate” mongers. i.e. we’ve come full circle.I read that the guy who played Chekov in the crap Star Trek reboot films was going to come out and expose a load of peados in Hollywood – next thing he gets run over by his own car…
Anonymous42Oh good! I can become an aspiring dirty old man!
Very good research job Rhino and I think you are right on point. They are normalizing pedophilia in the same manner and following the same strategy used to normalize homosexuality.
Step 1 de-criminalize,
Step 2 remove any mention of harm,
Step 3 “show empathy” because its just a personal choice,
Step 4 Shut down criticism of it,
Step 5 criminalize anyone critical as “hate” mongers. i.e. we’ve come full circle.Their agenda has two sides. Any prohibited content is exploited online to create “evidence” to arrest anyone of interest. Someone for example can include a image in a post with pedophile content, it will be downloaded by anyone who opens the post, will be stored on your local cache. This is enough reason to put you in jail here. Even if the image doesn’t render in your browser and you don’t see a thing, is possible to force it to download silently for the local cache, so in an investigation, it will show up.
My bet is, they will use this tactic to put some men in trouble, so people will fear being victims of a “false pedophilia claim”, and will push harder to decriminalize it. May be some paranoia in my head, but if we analyze the metoo and those false claims, I won’t expect anything different to happens in this scenario.
Rhino you tell it like it is brother, sadly we have come to this but i expected this would happen when all of those women who were teachers raped their students, all the while only getting a slap on the wrist for doing something that if men did it they would spend at least 20 years in jail.
And?
Are you a kid?
Are you a women?No?
Then why give a f~~~?
They can take all the wimin and little f~~~s and f~~~ them to death with a jack hammer I DONT GIVE A F~~~.
To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.
Anonymous3Even if the image doesn’t render in your browser and you don’t see a thing, is possible to force it to download silently for the local cache, so in an investigation, it will show up.
The security of everything people use, is almost a bad joke. Everything can be hacked, have backdoors, tricks, or simply leave data traces behind (like those f~~~ing cookies and cache and all “tracking mechanisms” on sites. In fact, even if one would browse web from a live CD read only system and no other storage, computer and user could be still tracked by canvas fingerprinting, mac address, ip address, dns queries, all network side stuff, and content can be viewed by man in the middle attacks also known as “SSL inspection” (that won’t show security alarm, any CA (“authority” of https certificates) can be forced by government, and it can issue certificate for any page…)
All what we use is inherently flawed on so many levels…
no biggy just shoot them and their backer
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678