Stephen Molyneux–Jian Gomeshi

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

Wow. I don’t think Stephen does anything half ass.

I just finished his you tube video on the above topic.

Nearly 2 hours long but the last 15 minutes were the best.

He finished by saying that “men were watching” and how this trial could crash civilization because in a high profile case of railroading, men are watching.

KM, better buy some more storage. I predict a few more men might stop by.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[VarunParticipant 2981]

Can you post the video here?

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[QuietlyquietlyParticipant 728]

I’m sorry to say that I think he’s being witch-hunted. I think he’s likely to get sentenced, despite Stephen Molyneux’s amazing examination of the evidence. From my perspective, Ghomeshi is interested in certain sexual preferences that are against the law, but otherwise not guilty. The problem is that he’s a celebrity, feminist, in feminist organisation (CBC), in a feminist country.

He was guilty just for being a man. Unfortunately, I think he’ll lose. Because, vagina. It will be a sad day for the entire world if that happens.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

I agree. This guy is out there, sexuality speaking.

But the DA (crown), did a poor job, the witness/ victims lied, and committed crimes and sand bagged their own case.

In the US he must walk. In Canada who knows.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Robert HallamParticipant 696]

I have to disagree. First let me deal with the charge of “choking to overcome resistance”. There is no possible way that he can be found guilty of this charge. By the testimony of the witness (Lucy) alone he did not choke her to stop her from resisting. She also clearly indicated that he choked her for maybe 10 seconds, and left no marks. I can hold my breath longer than 10 seconds. The law is clear on this point. The alleged perpetrator would only be guilty if he committed the act of choking in order to overcome her resistance in order for him to do something else that she objected to.

On the matters of sexual assault (four charges). All of the four charges of sexual assault occurred during a sensual act (kissing, cuddling, etc.). We know this for certain because of the testimony of the three witnesses. Consequently all of the charges were indeed sexual in nature. But were they assault or even consensual?

Here we come to credibility. The standard is “Reasonable Doubt”. The judge has to be certain to a point of beyond reasonable doubt in order to convict. Ghomeshi’s lawyer did such a good job of destroying the credibility of all three witnesses, that there was far more than reasonable doubt. As Ghomeshi’s lawyer pointed out, the truth would never have come out in court for the judge to hear, had the three alleged witnesses not been forced to tell the court the truth, when and only when, they were absolutely forced to tell the truth, when faced with their own words on e-mails, texts, and photographs. Even though the three alleged victims lied, there will be no charges against them for perjury, fabrication, or collusion. Pussy Pass in full force.

The judge is never going to find an alleged perpetrator guilty and punishable, with four counts of sexual assault carrying a sentence of 18 months each, unless he is absolutely certain, beyond a reasonable doubt that he is guilty.

[Robert HallamParticipant 696]

One of the best summaries and analyses of the Ghomeshi Trial I have ever seen. Really worth watching.

[QuietlyquietlyParticipant 728]

@robert Hallam, I absolutely agree with you on all points – the choking was not intended to cause a situation where he took advantage of her, all other alleged assaults were sexual, and consensual. The witnesses have colluded, withheld important evidence that would have affected going to trial or not, outright lied, and appear to be no more than creepy, stalking, infatuated but dumped ex-flings.

In any reasonable setting, this wouldn’t have come to trial, and in any reasonable setting, he would be acquitted (and should be). But Canada is strongly strongly feminist. The feminist narrative cannot be tampered with, and thus there is a conflict – release a guy who is toying with the dark side of feminine desires (anti-feminist), or hold the party line, and send him to jail despite his innocence.

I don’t hold out enough hope that Canada has a reasonable viewpoint. I suspect that there will be (pussy) riots on the street if he is acquitted. And the manginas in power are scared by female anger. Trudeau is the epitome of this.

That’s why I think he’s f~~~ed.

[Author]

Posts