Home › Forums › Computers, Games and Technology › Stephen Colbert Plus Anita Sarkeesian
This topic contains 6 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by Crocodileman 5 years, 2 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Stephen Colbert loses his b~~~~ to Anita Sarkeesian https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3uONAKyCu4&list=UUmb8hO2ilV9vRa8cilis88A
Colbert’s show never ran to my taste. I’m not a fan. I found a link to this on Viva La Manosphere!, the Drudge Report of men’s issues.
Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?
I saw some screen shots on instagram. I never cared for him either, but now I lost even more respect for him. What if the damsel can’t save her self? Should the man just let her die? Funny how you never hear her complain about the Tomb Raider reboot because that game is a damsel in distress game in every way.
I’ve heard some things about that interview supposedly and apparantly there was alot more questions that were asked than they showed. One of them was him asking her “Do you think video games can cause violence?”. She responded with “No, I don’t think they can cause violence” and he responded with “Then how can they be misogynistic?”. Of course this is just shown by a dude on reddit who claimed he was in the audience, so you can question its legitimacy.
Colbert is smart, and saying that he loses his b~~~~ to this bitch is a bit of an overstatement. He could’ve destroyed her with evidence, but no he plays along and sees if they can make a valid argument on national television and satires the hell out of the entire thing (as much as we would all love for it to go the other way). Sarkeesian ALSO supported the Shutdown Colbert campaign that went on back in 2012(?). And he has been one to remember things in the past like that. Still, I would’ve loved to see Colbert call her out on her bulls~~~ and have video proof of it and a lot of the Gamergate/Colbert supporters wish this interview could have gone differently.
I wonder why a lot was cut out if this was true. Did she beg them to edit stuff out? Did comedy central hope to maybe get some free pussy?
Honestly it was a weird event even for Colbert, the man who has always had the b~~~~ to take on big time politicians on both sides of the political spectrum regardless of gender. I don’t think he strictly cares about what Comedy Central thinks since he’s moving to the Late Show. Besides, Nowadays screaming MUHSOGINY is a big enough of an excuse for a bunch of people to come to your side and almost destroy anyone that you antagonize. That being said, it was probably why it didn’t show up, or the producers didn’t like it because they’re fearful of lawsuits (You know the same network that doesn’t give a f~~~ about who they offend and have done so on MULTIPLE occasions (Or South Park just hasn’t gotten around to making fun of Sarkeesian yet)).
<cite>@crocodileman said:</cite>
(You know the same network that doesn’t give a f~~~ about who they offend and have done so on MULTIPLE occasions (Or South Park hasn’t made fun of Sarkeesian yet)).I wanted South Park to do a gamer gate episode, but know I feel like Comedy Central would censor too much or make the anti gamer gate crowded out to look like they have some type of valid point.
Hell they had the b~~~~ enough to take on Al-Qaeda with that one episode with the guy in the bear suit, They’ve done s~~~ like that before, it’s only a matter of time. They’ll probably have some huge f~~~ing metaphor for the entire episode with sarkeesian as the crazy bitch that everyone makes fun of.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678