Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Spielberg – We Need a Female Indiana Jones
This topic contains 32 replies, has 25 voices, and was last updated by Y_ 1 year, 10 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
That’s just Speilberg… He has always been a G rated director who graced us with boring family flicks like Super 8 and others.
We already have enough faux hero movies. Hunger Games, Tomb Raider and about fifty other movies where an unbelievable female does things that no woman in history could ever do. Keep selling Egalitarianism and denying sexual dimorphism, just one more step towards human extinction.
We already have a female Indiana Jones, her name is Lara Croft.
Just recently I saw videos of Mark Hamill and Harrison Ford, where they describe their real despise towards what had been done with their characters in SW.
Can I imagine their hatred towards such a feminization of sci-fi / adventure films!
Oh come on! Those guys got the scripts before filming. They had no problem accepting payment to act out s~~~ they had an issue with. They could have easily said no.
Laura Croft…Someone should make a porn spin off – Lonely C~~~ & The Invasion of the Tomb Raiders.
@bangbros @brazzers @wickedpictures
How has this Indiana Jones spoof not happened yet?
Mindiana Jones: Raiders of the Lost C~~~.
Starring @MindiMinkThis is just begging to be made.
— Michael (@MWBoJr) April 4, 2018
Isabella Jones & The Lost Temple of Chads
On an archaeological mission and search for the Lost Temple of Chads
Ancient c~~~ must be found. . . . .
And f~~~ed.
Controversy to create buzz and get the money ball rolling for Indian Jones Part 5,6,7, the two trilogies set to debut in 2030, the eventual “remake” and 7 sequels. Total gross 800 billion.
Just a soap opera about an archaeologist. Let’s make a comment to get people arguing and sell more tickets. Don’t take the bait man.
It’s a bad idea, but I see no point in getting concerned about it either way. The idea is so bad I would not be surprised if this is just a stunt to convince SJW that they tried.
This is a worse idea than female ghostbusters. At least the male ghostbusters characters were not involved in physical violence and/or had a strong male role with respect to women. That is exactly what Indiana Jones is. He is physical and solves many of issues with a blunt punch. You can’t replicate that with a female. He is also bluntly logical, which is usually demonstrated in his dialog with women, who are there to be illogical, a contrast to Jones blunt logic. You can’t replicate that with a female actor.
All you can do is use the Jones name with similar film locations to sell crap. A female Indian Jones will just be Lara Croft by another name.
Thankfully though, I think I am beyond feeling like good movie franchises are ruin with these modernized crappy versions of them. Besides, the 4th film was already really crappy.
Ok. Then do it.
He is physical and solves many of issues with a blunt punch. You can’t replicate that with a female. He is also bluntly logical, which is usually demonstrated in his dialog with women, who are there to be illogical, a contrast to Jones blunt logic.
That’s precisely the point, purpose, and motivation behind it. Portraying women as “equals” to men in every way imaginable; only ‘sexy’.
It’s absolutely ridiculous. It’s bad enough to reboot so many films, but gender swapping roles is social engineering.
Resident cynic.
That’s precisely the point, purpose, and motivation behind it. Portraying women as “equals” to men in every way imaginable; only ‘sexy’.
But it can’t be done. Picture the scence from Raiders where Marion was stock in the c~~~pit of a plane, spinning around, and Indiana was in hand to hand combat with a muscle bound bad guy. Now switch the roles of Marion and Indiana. There is no way to make that scene work. First of all the male Marion would be completely unappealing as love interest for a female Indiana. At best, he’s comedy relief. Second, how can you make a female Indiana fight a much bigger man and make it entertaining and remotely believable. Perhaps you make the baddie a body building woman? How does that appeal to your male or female audience? Men will only care if it involves some shedding of clothes or boobs bouncing the right way….and that will offend the women. Women will only like it a woman beating a man in some weird way, like supernatural ability or superior emotional intelligence. It’s utter crap no matter what.
And by the way, Jones was popular amongst a female audience, because he WAS sexy and because he treated women the way they secretly wanted to be treated.
Ok. Then do it.
Isn’t that Laura Croft ?
Narwhal,
I agree with you. Creating a female Indiana Jones makes no sense and is utterly preposterous. But, that never stopped Hollywood. Even more so in a hyper feminized era. Regarding a petite woman fighting big men – they’ve been doing this in films for the past decade. There are countless films where this is portrayed. Some petite, sexy, female “bad ass” killing men who weigh twice what she does. Already been done countless times.
It’s utter crap no matter what.
Completely agree.
And by the way, Jones was popular amongst a female audience, because he WAS sexy
Completely agree as well. I meant they’re going to make the female version of Indiana Jones “equal” in every attribute, except replace them with a physically female form of sexiness. Hell, they’ll probably make her more intelligent and more caring as well. That’s just how they’re doing it in Hollywood now.
Resident cynic.
Isn’t that Laura Croft ?
Everyone keeps mentioning this film. I’ve never seen any of those. Is it really similar to Indiana Jones?
Resident cynic.
Everyone keeps mentioning this film. I’ve never seen any of those. Is it really similar to Indiana Jones?
Actually they are very similar in what they do. Yes.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678