Soy Boys Defend University Rape Myth

Topic by Oz-Bloke

Oz-Bloke

Home Forums MGTOW Central Soy Boys Defend University Rape Myth

Tagged: ,

This topic contains 13 replies, has 12 voices, and was last updated by The Wall®  The Wall® 1 year, 4 months ago.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #854855
    +8
    Oz-Bloke
    Oz-Bloke
    Participant
    3233

    Check out these soy-boy cucks attacking Australian sex therapist, journalist and clinical psychologist Bettina Arndt as she tries to give a series of lectures about the myth there is a “rape crisis” at Australian universities.
    .
    Australian sex therapist, journalist and clinical psychologist Bettina Arndt is confronted by protesters from the Victorian Socialists at La Trobe University
    .
    Get a job ya’ dickheads!

    To quote an article on the matter in The Australian this week –

    “Bettina Arndt has confronted protesting socialist students as she starts her controversial university tour about campus rape.

    The sex therapist and columnist gave her first of a series of lectures on why she believes there is not a “rape crisis” at Australian universities at La Trobe University today, but not everyone wanted to listened.

    All through Ms Arndt’s lecture, protesters aligned with the Victorian Socialists banged on the doors of the Eastern Lecture Theatre and chanted “Bettina Arndt, go to hell. Go take Milo (Yianipoulos) there as well.”

    But before she spoke, the sex therapist approached the students at their uni square stand and tried to talk to them. The socialist students just kept chanting.

    “Why don’t they come and listen to me speak? And engage in a conversation around this issue,” she said, “What are they afraid of?”

    The lecture comes a week after La Trobe University reversed their ban on the student Liberal Club inviting Ms Arndt to speak on campus.

    Ms Arndt’s lectures use cases of US rape allegations, and data from both the NSW bureau of Crime Statistics and the Australian Human Rights Commission, to make the case that there is not a growing prevalence of rape and sexual assault against female university students.

    The sex therapist has said she wants to tackle the unfair treatment of male students who are falsely accused of sex crimes on campus. But her critics accuse her of victim blaming.

    Ms Arndt said she spoke to the socialist speakers, despite their aggressiveness, because she wanted to invite them to the lecture.

    “I went over there to ask them to come and listen and ask me questions,” she said, “they proceeded to scream in my ear from a foot away.”

    Ms Arndt faced sceptical audience members inside too.

    But she and her audience of supporters and critics battled on while the protesters banged on the doors and chanting “F*ck off, f*ck off, Bettina,” to the tune of Queen’s We Will Rock You, and “When women’s rights are under attack, what do we do? We fight back.”

    It’s amazing the way the feminazi ‘industry’ brain-washes gullible cuck soy-boys into protesting on their behalf. Maybe when their b~~~~ drop they can engage in a rational discussion. God forbid someone actually wants to talk about “facts” at a university that may contradict the lucrative feminist social justice agenda.
    .
    Male Feminist Magazine Cover

    #ManOut

    #854860
    +7

    Anonymous
    1

    These Soy Boys will be getting the #METOO treatment. Male feminists are the ones, who get taken down with the false accusations. Have fun with that. 🙂

    #854876
    +8

    Anonymous
    12

    Reminds me of ANTIFA goons attacking non white cops who are trying to do their jobs by protecting people from ANTIFA!

    These Mangina’s are idiots, trying to silence a woman who is wanting to speak the truth and actually de-vilify men.

    And they still won’t get laid for it!

    #854885
    +8

    Anonymous
    2

    And after this was over, the soy boys watched the girls they were trying to impress go off to bang Chads who are in gangs and sell drugs. Watching these cucks fail over and over again is hilarious and depressing at the same time. It’s like “How many times do you need to be rejected or friend-zoned before you wake up and realize that women find manginas repulsive? You’re Charlie Brown and the women telling you they like male feminists are Lucy with the football! Wake the f~~~ up!”

    #854892
    +3
    SH3LLZ
    SH3LLZ
    Participant
    5569

    These Soy Boys will be getting the #METOO treatment. Male feminists are the ones, who get taken down with the false accusations. Have fun with that. 🙂

    Very true. Louis CK was one of those male feminists… His comedy devolved into that whole, “Im raising my daughters to be gay” s~~~… Look where it got him.

    The male feminist is basically the nice guy in the friend-zone who is still a hopeful pussy-beggar.

    #ICETHEMOUT
    #MANOUT
    #HIDEYOURWEALTH!

    #ICETHEMOUT!!! #MANOUT!!! #HIDEYOURWEALTH #VAGINAISWORTHLESS

    #854897
    +3

    Anonymous
    12

    And after this was over, the soy boys watched the girls they were trying to impress go off to bang Chads who are in gangs and sell drugs. Watching these cucks fail over and over again is hilarious and depressing at the same time. It’s like “How many times do you need to be rejected or friend-zoned before you wake up and realize that women find manginas repulsive? You’re Charlie Brown and the women telling you they like male feminists are Lucy with the football! Wake the f~~~ up!”

    Exactly. The girls they are so foolishly trying to protect are dancing on table tops for Chad and other cashed up type men as well as banging them because they are infinitely more interesting than some skinny geek who only aims to serve as their lap dog.

    Oh well, perhaps they might get lucky and catch a glimpse of their Princess naked when she calls them in to serve drinks and sandwiches after the fun has been had?

    #854908
    +4
    Puffin Stuff
    Puffin Stuff
    Participant
    24979

    Universities are the safest place for young women in the world. Every daddies girl that is let out of the house at 18 is watched over like a hawk by mommy and daddy. The one thing these hovering parents can’t change is young women’s total whorishness when they are horny. Threesomes, foursomes, moresomes, our young women are out to have fun like they’ve read in women’s studies that boy’s used to have.

    Men have been neutered now and can be counted on to the the good little lap dog’s women think they want. Until they get one then it’s…I’m bored, maybe a divorce will provide the attention I require.

    #icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

    #854916
    +4
    743 roadmaster
    743 roadmaster
    Participant

    Let me guess, boys raised by single feminist mothers. Along with the crap drilled into there heads by the public school system the idiots have no clue what so ever. Going to be a life time of critical mistakes soyboys get used to alone broke and desperate.

    mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

    #854925
    +4
    Morpheus
    Morpheus
    Participant
    2177

    Velvet jacket, flower shirt, high heel shoes, skinny jeans. And I am having a hard time to make whether it is a boy/girl.

    #854954
    +5
    Secret Agent MGTOW
    Secret Agent MGTOW
    Participant
    22543

    Women will turn on any man, perceived foe first, stranger, or friend. They lie. They want drama. They want to have a story to tell the hive, too. They want to be part of whatever collective experience is going on. They want to be a symbol, fake or real. Its why blacks fake racial attacks. Its why women create fake rape stories. Its why gays fake attacks on themselves. Its attention whoring, focus on their pitiful selves, no one is hurting them but they want to have a story of opression to be validated, so they create the false story and try to get their hamster to make them believe it.

    They turn on the soy boy cucks who supported them because these are the men around them they can use in their fake stories to make the lie more plausible. They will be thrown into the fake rape shredder because thats all what these women have to work with. They just use what they have handy, and those are the guys that will be falsely made into rapists, sexual assaulters, or harassers.

    Its f~~~ing weak and sick. Its all lies by small, warped, self centered, irrational women.

    Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

    #854967
    +5
    Branched off
    Branched off
    Participant
    10967

    Wow that little Aussie leftie turd with the megaphone looked just like the little lefty turds I avoided in my university days nearly 30 years ago in England.

    There is definitely a type. Where do they get those velvet jackets? I never saw a man’s clothing shop sell them.

    A poor excuse for a man, loves the attention he can get, feels protected by his “right to protest” to he can bully people who could make him feel 12 inches tall if they ever turned their attention on him. (Almost certainly a total pussy beggar inside too). You just want to slap him round the back of the head don’t you? You just want to do something to stick a pin in the balloon of self importance he has created by annoying the grown ups.

    A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own

    #854971
    +4
    Rhino
    Rhino
    Participant
    3477

    Brainwashed fools the lot of them they will learn the hard way these are the men who are first to go when SHTF.

    #858428
    +2
    Oz-Bloke
    Oz-Bloke
    Participant
    3233

    Bit of an update on this thread. In The Australian newspaper this week Former High Court chief justice Robert French has warned universities face the risk of legislative intervention unless they provide a robust defence of free speech on campus. The article is entitled – Unis urged: freedom of speech more important than people’s feelings

    Radical Left Wing Feminist La Trobe University Students

    Image: Columnist Bettina Arndt is confronted by protesters at La Trobe University earlier this month for exposing the myth that campus sexual assault is on the rise.

    To quote the article –

    “In remarks that implicitly criticise restrictions on debate at several universities, the former chief justice rejected the imposition of rules designed to protect the feelings of the university community.

    He also rejected the use of what he described as “an extended concept of safety” to justify restrictions on what can be discussed in public.

    Mr French said university ­administrators, academics and student bodies should be required to overcome “a very high threshold” before seeking to prevent speech on campus by reference to its content.

    His remarks follow a series of incidents in which universities and student groups have tried to prevent academics and public figures from discussing contentions subjects in public.

    La Trobe University tried to prevent columnist Bettina Arndt from speaking on campus after organisers were told that her ­address questioning the existence of a rape culture did not align with the university’s campaign against sexual violence. The university later reversed its position.

    The former chief justice was delivering the Austin Asche ­oration for Charles Darwin University and Australian Academy of Law.

    He warned that the actions of university executives were probably subject to the implied constitutional freedom of political communication.

    “To the extent that universities, operating under the authority of acts of parliament which create them, make legal rules affecting freedom of speech, those rules would have to comply with the implied freedom,” he said.

    “There is a question whether administrative policies would be subject to the same constraints. Given that university executives act under the authority of the law setting up the university and ­defining its powers, the answer is probably yes.”

    Mr French said the public ­debate in Australia and elsewhere about protest action by academics and student groups was viewed by some as “a worrying intolerance for the expression at universities of views which some consider harmful”.

    He pointed out that “harm” was a concept that involved contestable value judgments.

    “What one person regards as harmful another may legitimately view as bearing no adverse consequence,’’ Mr French said.

    While all universities were subject to the implied freedom of ­political communication, public universities in the ACT and Victoria were subject to the guarantees of freedom of speech in the ACT Human Rights Act and the Victorian Charter of Rights.”

    So there you have it, a former high court judge sounding off a legal alarm about pandering to the trigger-puff, hypersensitive snowflakes that are taking over society. His efforts no doubt to avoid the Orwellian 1984 ‘thought-police’ hotbeds that colleges are fast becoming.

    #ManOut

    #858766
    +1
    The Wall®
    The Wall®
    Participant
    655

    That turd in the velvet jacket is a male? Damn! I thought it was a butch lesbian.

    Dr. Veritas' Red Pill dosage recommendation: Once a day or more as needed.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.