"Somethings" Missing

[MonkParticipant 17042]

Mr. Spock wrote:

Nowadays that number has dropped to under 30. Maybe even around 25.

Given how early they start whoring and how hard they ride the carousel, I’ll go with 25. I often see women in their mid-late 20’s that look 10-15 years older.

[JB BooksParticipant 3182]

Lately, I’ve had a few women approach me. They were above average for post wall, and while it’s kinda flattering, I’m just not interested. If it was a pump and dump, yeah o.k., but you know that’s not how it’d probably work out. Too much time, expense and potential hassle. Just a lot easier to pick the one guaranteed option: GMOW.

We just don't realize life's most significant events while they're happening. Back then, I thought, "Well, there'll be other days". I didn't realize that that was the only day. - "Moonlight" Graham

[Anonymous 38]

‘Something’, AKA someone who loves ME, someone to support ME. That’s it. Someone whose pension I can benefit from and whom I can nag to DEATH and live the high life when he croaks. These man-hating f~~~s can’t love a man. Because they care so much about themselves and what others think of THEM, the only thing they care about is having a comfortable life and preferably one which impresses her peers.

Being with a man she admires and loves is pretty low on the laundry list. Whereas for men it’s pretty much top of the criteria.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

In most species it is the male that has a more attractive qualities to attract a mate. Thus putting themselves in a survival disadvantage as they don’t have camaflage.

Human men are so cowed that they let the ugly birds run the show.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Knights Templar RisingParticipant 5116]

At middle age, most of us guys know their game down pat. One thing that makes me punt them quick, is when they go into this weird mode of neurosis. Once they feel they have their hooks into you, time length can vary greatly, they begin saying that you’re either “doing too much of something” or “doing too little of something”. This “mode” will engage immediately once you cohabitate, you are f~~~ing DOOMED, it will happen. But with dating it’s a weird evolution of sorts, that evolves based on her fickle nature. This usually kicks in anywhere between 3-12 months, another reason to use the 3 month “oil change rule”. I usually find some other solid reason to dump most of them before 3 months anyhow. Get back out on the meat market girl, you’ll find your pushover simp to fill what’s “missing”…someday…lulz…

Sovereignty above all else.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

JB Books wrote:

Lately, I’ve had a few women approach me. They were above average for post wall, and while it’s kinda flattering, I’m just not interested. If it was a pump and dump, yeah o.k., but you know that’s not how it’d probably work out. Too much time, expense and potential hassle. Just a lot easier to pick the one guaranteed option: GMOW.

The one’s that have approached me have been “dance moms”. My youngest dances and its the single mothers of other kids at the same dance studio. I told my daughter right away after the split that I would never date a dance mom because I don’t want it to cause any difficulty at dance. That’s her sanctuary and dance is all about her, not her dad dating. Got the biggest thank you I’ve ever got from her.

I guess what I’ve always wondered is why the mommies aren’t as protective of their daughters as I am. What if they aren’t friends? What if they become really close and then we split up? And what about all of the gossip between the kids and the other parents? Wouldn’t it just be easier to make that an off-limits zone? Aren’t these the women who claim to put their kids first, and you just have to deal with the fact that the kids are always #1?

Order the good wine

[Knights Templar RisingParticipant 5116]

TaxGuy wrote:

JB Books wrote:

Lately, I’ve had a few women approach me. They were above average for post wall, and while it’s kinda flattering, I’m just not interested. If it was a pump and dump, yeah o.k., but you know that’s not how it’d probably work out. Too much time, expense and potential hassle. Just a lot easier to pick the one guaranteed option: GMOW.

The one’s that have approached me have been “dance moms”. My youngest dances and its the single mothers of other kids at the same dance studio. I told my daughter right away after the split that I would never date a dance mom because I don’t want it to cause any difficulty at dance. That’s her sanctuary and dance is all about her, not her dad dating. Got the biggest thank you I’ve ever got from her.
I guess what I’ve always wondered is why the mommies aren’t as protective of their daughters as I am. What if they aren’t friends? What if they become really close and then we split up? And what about all of the gossip between the kids and the other parents? Wouldn’t it just be easier to make that an off-limits zone? Aren’t these the women who claim to put their kids first, and you just have to deal with the fact that the kids are always #1?

Look at the Dance Mom’s in your group. Are they clique driven? do they like $100 yoga pants purely for status? If so, see my post about men being a status symbol accessory for their competition with other women. Women’s morality becomes gray when it comes to acquiring status, the kid’s importance will temporarily be lowered while she focuses on they prey.

Sovereignty above all else.

[UntamedParticipant]

TaxGuy wrote:

Aren’t these the women who claim to put their kids first, and you just have to deal with the fact that the kids are always #1?

They only say that to virtue-signal their motherhood and when it advantages them. Their actions spell something wholly different.
If you hang by a woeman’s every word, you’re in a world of hurt.
In my experience, you can’t believe ONE single f~~~ing word that escapes their lips.

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22546]

TaxGuy wrote:

Let me make this point one more time. When she says something’s missing, that something is a noun. An object. A man, a husbank, a “soulmate”, whatever. But what’s really missing is the action (a verb), and that verb is love. Because women see love as a noun, a thing, a thing that is missing.
What they are really missing is the capacity to love (verb) someone else. If you want it you have to give it. If you want someone to love you, you have to love them. If you want respect, you have to respect the other person. If you want someone to give you their attention, you have to give your attention to them. Doing those things doesn’t mean you will get them back, but not doing them does guarantee that you won’t get them back.
The “something” that is missing is their ability to care about anyone but themselves.

To men, love is a verb. Active. To women its a noun, passive. Even the act of making love. Generally who’s the active one and who’s the passive one. Guys usually burn 80% or more of the calories during sex, so there’s a hint. Men f~~~, women get f~~~ed. Verb, active. Noun, passive.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Dark KenshiParticipant 2132]

What is missing in them is a soul.

The only thing women are a bit good at is to give birth. Everything else, they need a “partner” to do it for them, or to show them how to do it. Women can be compared at paper pushers in any public office that you can see around the world, they are there just to create barriers, not to make things work or to make the things.

That is why they are missing “love”, because to them, love is what someone do to them, how someone worship them, how someone wants them more than their own life or self-preservation instincts. Women don’t need love, they need attention, they crave being wanted. Men want love. This here should be the biggest clue for any man with more than the IQ of a potato.

What should be the next thing they “miss” is men. We should be nowhere, just an empty chair lying around to remind them how much they needed us and how many times they told us that we were not needed. One time is too many times.

"Young was I once, I walked alone, and bewildered seemed in the way; then I found me another and rich I thought me, for man is the joy of man." Odin, Hàvamàl, stanza 47.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Awakened wrote:

BUT something is missing

Note how it’s some THING.

They don’t want an particular man in their lives. Just a man in general. He is just an object to her. A utility. Fully interchangeable and replaceable.

Awakened wrote:

the term “Host” seems more appropriate

And that, right there, is the reason why.

Does a flea care which dog it rides?

[Knights Templar RisingParticipant 5116]

The thing that plagues half of these women in middle age, is that they get a chip on their shoulder, they put up this ridiculous list of requirements…it’s like the Crone Force needs to be balanced out, for the other half of them who get slutty. I don’t even have to read them now, I just see a mass of text and skip it. What’s missing? The guy who meets your criteria is missing from your Pareto Chart, and no amount of photo manipulation will bring him back.

Sovereignty above all else.

[ZoidbergParticipant 965]

Dark Kenshi wrote:

The only thing women are a bit good at is to give birth.

A bit good at it? They need a f~~~ton of help to even give birth*. Unlike a cat, for example. Or a dog. A cow. Name any mammal.

* And the result is a half-product at best.

[Buller100Participant 2189]

Awakened wrote:

It seems that a central theme with single/divorced Woman is that they all like to claim how independent and stable they are yet they often also say something to the effect of, “BUT something is missing because I don’t have a “soul mate” to share my wonderful life with.”
REALLY, I wonder?? Is it that, or maybe you just don’t feel quite “complete” without a resident man servant at your beck and call to perform all the duties that either you can’t do, or that you choose to not be bothered to do.
Could it also be that while you claim to be so independent and stable, you actually spend a lot more than the money that you make on your house, clothes, shoes, jewelry, cars, traveling, eating out, furnishings etc. etc. etc., and having a new source of funds, and a resident man servant kind of kills 2 birds with one stone…
AND, lets not forget about how LONELY ya get when you’re all by yourself probably because you don’t find any comfort in your own solitude all you find is the feeling of emptiness/loneliness, and to have a man saddled down when and where you want him like a lil plaything to listen to all your CRAP, and put up with your temper tantrums and drama comes in handy for you as well…
MAYBE, that “something” that’s missing in their lives really isn’t a “soulmate”, but the term “Host” seems more appropriate.

Most men are entertainers for women “what do you want to eat ” etc. If the women is very dominant then the man is little more than a pet dog or a slave , whilst slavery is not nice having a person fetch and carry for you , give you money must be nice.

Anything before the but is a lie , they say they are strong and independent as its meant to intimidate a guy , of they were they would not be searching for a soul mate , also they fall on their sword as the ‘Current soulmate ” always is worth more in net or earnings , that fact alone proves them to be liars.

[Dark KenshiParticipant 2132]

Zoidberg wrote:

Dark Kenshi wrote:

The only thing women are a bit good at is to give birth.

A bit good at it? They need a f~~~ton of help to even give birth*. Unlike a cat, for example. Or a dog. A cow. Name any mammal.
* And the result is a half-product at best.

That is why I said that they are a BIT good, bro. If they were GOOD at it, they would do it like other mammals.

"Young was I once, I walked alone, and bewildered seemed in the way; then I found me another and rich I thought me, for man is the joy of man." Odin, Hàvamàl, stanza 47.

[OneLaneOnlyPlsParticipant 1747]

Awakened wrote:

AND, lets not forget about how LONELY ya get when you’re all by yourself probably because you don’t find any comfort in your own solitude all you find is the feeling of emptiness/loneliness, and to have a man saddled down when and where you want him like a lil plaything to listen to all your CRAP, and put up with your temper tantrums and drama comes in handy for you as well…

Nailed it, right there.

The cost is too high, even for those who still want to date women.

[Author]

Posts