Solving the woman problem

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

Please hear me out and let’s just see. We all know that crazy women tend to be sleeping with mulitiple of men. In the past many men wanted to sleep with more than one woman. Starting in the 1800’s men did have more than one woman however it was only the rich men. After the 1900’s things slowly change where men are able sleep with other women. This is especially true after 1920’s from what I read. Before cultural Marxism and feminism men started sleeping with multiple women.
The birth control pill gave women the true freedom to have sex on a casual basis.
Common sense tells you if you can buy a gun, you know it’s wrong to kill someone with it. Common sense tells men if men sleep with men they create whores. We all know it’s these women more likely to report false rape and financially rape through divorce.
PUAs like RooshV makes things and worse and any man having casual sex does also. My solution would be dating a woman for 16 to 24 months before having sex. From what I have read women tend to be happier if they wait for sex. Even waiting 6 months before having sex makes a woman more satisfied with relationship.

Btw I’m not judging but if you’re having sex with multiple women, I am not talking about breaking up and finding another woman to have a relationship with. I know it’s goes against men’s thinking but I always try to see how we can solve the problem. Having casual sex with women not only harms men but also harms women.

Btw when I am talking about dating 16 to 24 hours months i don’t mean courting them. Obviously financially women can’t be trusted so going dutch is ideal. If a woman can date going dutch for 16 to 24 months without dating other men or having sex with them.
I think Tom Leykis made many mistakes. He talks about having casual sex before he started getting married. Now I don’t know if he had sex with these women he married before marriage but it most likely he did.

The study, published in the August issue of the Journal of Marriage and Family (but not available online), found that women who dated their partner for at least 182 days (!) before having sex with him reported higher levels of satisfaction, commitment, intimacy, emotional support, and sexual satisfaction in the resulting relationship.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/strictly-casual/201402/is-casual-sex-bad-your-mental-health

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2012/09/05/_182_days_till_sex_new_study_says_the_key_to_relationship_satisfaction_is_waiting_six_months_to_do_it_.html

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[hellraiderParticipant 2837]

The solution is a fleshlight and a sexbot when they become available. The end.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Crazy Canuck wrote:

My solution would be dating a woman for 16 to 24 months before having sex. From what I have read women tend to be happier if they wait for sex. Even waiting 6 months before having sex makes a woman more satisfied with relationship.

From my experience, most women will not be willing to date you for this long prior to having sex with them, and if they do they’ll be getting sex elsewhere during this waiting period.

Let’s face it man…if women wanted to wait even 6 months before having sex, they’d do it. Most young women these days operate under the 3 date rule if they even make it that long. A whores a whore…sadly that’s most women lol.

[Mu_uNSpectator 130]

I tell you truly, there’s only one way

.
.

.
.

Cuz a woman is supposed to be seen and not heard!!

[narwhalParticipant]

I looked at the 2 articles you quoted and they both seem to imply that studies haven’t been able to isolate other factors that may contribute to happiness, which is really expected for something as complex as depression and anxiety. For one thing, we all have various social pressures regarding when it’s the appropriate time to have sex, and not waiting long enough or too long could raise anxiety.

To me it feels like sex is somewhat of an end game, like the climax is to any story (pun intended). It’s the goal, so once it’s achieved, there is not much left but the credits. You reach that ‘now what?’ moment. If you prolong having sex, then you have time to get to know the person and develop attachments. Once the sex happens, then there’s isn’t a ‘now what?’ moment is you have that attachment to build off of.

So should you wait or go ahead when you get the green light? Well, what’s your goal? If you want a long term relationship, having sex early will cause stress because it will keep you from your goal. If you don’t (or don’t care) sex early seems the way to go as it achieves your goal.

So I’d say, throw out your social pressures and do what you want to do, knowing that your actions have consequences.

Ok. Then do it.

[narwhalParticipant]

Beer wrote:

From my experience, most women will not be willing to date you for this long prior to having sex with them, and if they do they’ll be getting sex elsewhere during this waiting period.

That is one reaction. The other is, they will have a mental breakdown wondering why you aren’t trying to get in their pants. They won’t tell you, but let it twist around in their head till they kill their sense of worth and whatever sanity they had, then blame you for doing it to them. The idea of telling you they want to f~~~ never even occurs to them.

Ok. Then do it.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

I want you to think about something, concerning this issue.

Some people consider being alone a good thing. It is not. But, the feminists and manginas have made being a man a very lonely life.

Robin Williams was correct. It is not being allow that is the worst thing that can happen to someone. It is being around people that made a person feel alone.

And that is what feminists and manginas have done to men.

But, feminists and women in general have gotten lazy and spoiled in their own social lives. They live on their smartphones, facebook, and twitter accounts. And when the switch is finally turned off, they won’t know what to do. And for the first time ever they will have a taste of the loneliness that they have forced men to suffer.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

narwhal wrote:

Beer wrote:

From my experience, most women will not be willing to date you for this long prior to having sex with them, and if they do they’ll be getting sex elsewhere during this waiting period.

That is one reaction. The other is, they will have a mental breakdown wondering why you aren’t trying to get in their pants. They won’t tell you, but let it twist around in their head till they kill their sense of worth and whatever sanity they had, then blame you for doing it to them. The idea of telling you they want to f~~~ never even occurs to them.

Bingo.
Do you know what is the kind of man that is more similar to the average “princess”? A PUA. The only difference is that the PUA wants a lot of pussy from a lot of women, the “princess” wants a lot of resources from a man. But their weak ego, sense of worth related to sex (much more related to getting attentions and resources for women, but also sex plays a very important role even for women: their ego is especially boosted by withholding sex) and manipulatory behavior it’s the same.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[hellraiderParticipant 2837]

Women hypergamy means they follow a pareto or 80% 20% rule.

80% of women get f~~~ed by the 20% of alpha guys.

Woman have twisted and corrupted the relationships between the sexes that men are just drooping out and going full mgtow.

Hell, if bad and rare sex is the only thing women have to offer in a relationship, men prefer to buy a fleshligt or to go to a prostitute once in a while.

Its cheaper and a lor safer.

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

What I’m trying to say is if you want a good qualtiy woman for a relationship you will have to weed out women. Women are more likely to be depressed and do crazy things if they have casual sex. One thing is for sure marriage was a lot better before the sexual revolution. There were quality women because men typically didn’t have sex out of marriage. I’m not advocating marriage but it’s still go thing to wait. If you’re sleeping with many women you are contributing to the problem because men say we don’t want to have a relationship with a slut.
For men having casual sex you’re really playing Russian roulette, you’re more of risk of being accused of rape and domestic violience. If you are willing to take the risk then you shouldn’t complain on here. I will never give support to a man who willing have casual sex and then complain he has been falsely accused of rape. Just look at RooshV.

Risky business: Is there an association between casual sex and mental health among emerging adults?

A multiethnic sample of single, heterosexual, emerging-adult college students (N = 3,907) ages 18 to 25, from 30 institutions across the United States, participated in a study about identity, culture, psychological well-being, and risky behaviors. Given ongoing debates about the connection between casual sex and psychological adjustment, in the current study we assessed the cross-sectional association of participation in casual sex with psychological well-being and distress. A greater proportion of men (18.6%) compared to women (7.4%) reported having had casual sex in the month prior to assessment. Structural equation modeling indicated that casual sex was negatively associated with well-being (ß = .20, p < .001) and positively associated with psychological distress (ß = .16, p < .001). Gender did not moderate these associations. For emerging-adult college students, engaging in casual sex may elevate risk for negative psychological outcomes.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23742031

How Poor Mental Health and Casual Sex Reinforce Each Other

http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/casualsex.htm

Mental Health Issues Intertwined with Casual Sex Among Teens

Mental Health Issues Intertwined with Casual Sex Among Teens

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

Mental Health Issues Intertwined with Casual Sex Among Teens

Mental Health Issues Intertwined with Casual Sex Among Teens

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

hellraider wrote:

Women hypergamy means they follow a pareto or 80% 20% rule.

80% of women get f~~~ed by the 20% of alpha guys.

I am not sure that the ratio and percentiles are they high.

If it was broken down further along social classes, it might be more like 80% (women) 40% (men).

Just look at some of the men that women date. They are no alpha men. Many of them have no money and no job. They dress like a teenagers. And not the stylish teenagers. And they seem to have no self-respect in their body language. The best I can figure is the women are telling each other, with social media, which men they find to be a good f~~~. Though, that is not the topic I would like to discuss.

Anyway, the 20% of men you mention are likely infected with several STDs and that they give back to women. The tighter and lower a number of a population pool in such activities, the quicker such diseases spread. And these 20% of men likely four times more likely to be infected with STDs than the 80% of women they have sex with.

[HitmanParticipant]

Their very nature is the problem. Selfish, spoiled princesses don’t deserve the time of day. If they have some manners and don’t push feminist ideas around AT ALL. .I can tolerate them..otherwise my time is too valuable to waste.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Crazy Canuck wrote:

What I’m trying to say is if you want a good qualtiy woman for a relationship you will have to weed out women. Women are more likely to be depressed and do crazy things if they have casual sex. One thing is for sure marriage was a lot better before the sexual revolution. There were quality women because men typically didn’t have sex out of marriage. I’m not advocating marriage but it’s still go thing to wait. If you’re sleeping with many women you are contributing to the problem because men say we don’t want to have a relationship with a slut.
For men having casual sex you’re really playing Russian roulette, you’re more of risk of being accused of rape and domestic violience. If you are willing to take the risk then you shouldn’t complain on here. I will never give support to a man who willing have casual sex and then complain he has been falsely accused of rape. Just look at RooshV.

I’ve pretty much came to the same conclusion myself…its just that I’ve given up searching for such women because they don’t really exist anymore. All the good women I know who I think would fit the description you present are all 60+ years old and pre-date feminism going mainstream…and well…I’m not really looking to settle down with someone old enough to be my grandmother…

Research that is dated at this point used to claim the average person had 4-7 partners over the course of a life time. I’m pretty sure the average woman these days is more than double that before she’s even out of college.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

It is common sense that a female that hooks up, bonds, and then moves on, repeat. Is going to suffer mental health issues.

Feminism can’t beat biology.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Author]

Posts