Social Justice for Men

[J.D SilvernailParticipant 383]

Look at the court systems these days. In divorce cases men are required to pay child support up to 20-25% of their income according to http://www.greatdivorceadvise.com/child-support/Child-Support-Percentage.htm . These women are very irresponsible with that money and spend it to make themselves look good. They can’t teach their sons how to be men and they teach their daughters to be sluts. The children in a divorce are better off being raised by their dads. Because of this and a lot of other social injustices against men I believe that we should peacefully protest at the supreme court in Washington d.c and demand that they give all men full legal custody of their kids and make women pay 50% of their income in child support.

I'm married to the game,but she broke her vows.

[Smitty the Great OneParticipant 1535]

there is no such thing as “social justice” only revenge…

Life is too long to play by someone elses rules....

[experiencedParticipant]

Nurse told me to warn my son about young females directly lying that they’re on the pill, to three different guys over three years. They get basically two decades worth of a ride on child support.

More importantly to older guys is this recently observed phenomenon: Have seen this three times over a short interval. The woman is gorgeous, appears responsible, physically tight…..  Then, the five and eighteen year olds are discovered.  THINK ABOUT IT.  Odds are two men already dumped by her,…….[to tune of i did it my way]] “but now, the time has come, to come to grips, with reduced cash flow.”   The eighteen year old will/is soon not providing a means to extract child support, and guess what, they are irresponsible since no real DAD i.e. no real teacher of responsibility. So, they get dumped like the prior two mates, or double whammy..no cash through them and they stay and don’t pull their weight.

Three times in a short interval.  It’s not looks, heck, that’s a pretty close likeness to me in the left column.  They’re just out for guaranteed  cash flow via the next sucker, and who will come after me?

Also, noticed with the older ones, a sniffing around for careers (ie RETIREMENTS…….of all sorts), and remember, she won’t be with you then either, she just wants to slice out another piece for herSELF.

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

“Social Justice” isn’t.  If you have to put a qualifier in front of it then it’s not justice, it’s just some newspeak scam.

What men need in the family courts is plain old ordinary actual Justice.

Of course beyond justice there’s also plain old pragmatism.  Statistics have shown that children of single father households have the lowest dropout rates, lowest incarceration rates, highest graduation rates (both high school and college) and highest average earnings in their adulthoods than children of two parent households or children of single mother households.  Now this could be due to selection bias, because a man has to be an exceptional blend of Einstein, Rockefeller, and Christ Himself for the courts to award him custody over a single mother, but I honestly don’t think the numbers would drop all that much if more single fathers were allowed to actually raise their children.

So never mind justice, which does society need more to function?  More winners raised by single fathers?  Or more losers raised by single mothers?

Of course I’m not saying all children raised by single mothers turn out to be losers, but the odds are definitely stacked against them, and society really should be playing the odds instead of investing our collective future in the childraising equivalent of  scratch and win lose lottery tickets.

[Cipher HighwindParticipant 1144]

“Social justice” is Orwellian double-speak for hatred of white men.

[AussieBlokeParticipant 144]

Personally I think children should go to whichever parent has the finances to give the child the best opportunities in life, get rid of all the child support bulls~~~ altogether, If the custodial parent is failing, then the other gets a chance to do better. When the child gets to age 12 they can think for themselves which is the better parent and they can go with the one they want.

In Australia, there is a law that the custodial parent cannot move away from the original family home/region unless agreed to by the non custodial parent, this is a really smart thing because it ensures fathers can still be directly involved in raising the children.

The harder the fight the sweeter the victory

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

AussieBloke wrote:

In Australia, there is a law that the custodial parent cannot move away from the original family home/region unless agreed to by the non custodial parent, this is a really smart thing because it ensures fathers can still be directly involved in raising the children.

Most places have a law like that.  The trick is getting them enforced.

[DruidVIParticipant 23]

Begging Big Daddy Govt. for lighter chains is what the manginas do over at AVFM.

 

This site is for MGTOW.

 

There is no going back to the plantation, no matter how much “social justice” we Men may magnanimously receive from our slave masters, too little, too late. That game is done.

It’s all on fire now.

Let it burn.

 

 

 

 

 

[Anonymous 42]

I second that call on justice….

[Author]

Posts