So how long have human beings been around?

[Y_Participant 4591]

As humans evolve the distinction between male and female most likely will disappear. I am not talking about fusion, rather further evolution of the species.

Our descendants will have as much in common with us as we do with amoebae – our ancestors.

Homo sapiens will become irrelevant and a historical curiosity, if nothing else. That is neither a good or bad thing. It is simply a fact of life.

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

Again, thank you for everyone for helping me with this question. It truly a treasure to have such great minds in one place.

It just alarms me that what I am seeing is that just as feminism is trying to belittle man’s accomplishments today. I think there is some serious sand in some orifices that want to push credit from man’s ingenuity of the past and categorize in order to further dismay mankind from future accomplishments.

So, to me, It does matter quite a great deal that in the past, such great inventions and technology are being discredited.

This especially alarms me when what is going on today is that we are now quelling achievements due to political agendas.

Sure there was some really funky s~~~ going on. And plenty of horrors of the past. But it should not dismay others from understanding that some of the greatest inventions ever created came from these terrible times in our history.

Learning from the past helps us all get to a better future. And what I am seeing is that right now, there is some kind of stigma from even doing research in these fields.

Its true humans as we are now are going to be looked at as some kind of oddity when looking back. But what’s going to be odd is that in the future, I wonder if they are going to cover up things that women have invented or were thought of that were distasteful delights to their preference for example of abortion technology.

I doubt killing of millions of babies is going to be lauded as some kind of achievement. Hell you don’t even see women talking about it today.

But I wonder how many more of these kids of things have been covered up just to maintain strong hold on human achievement or evolution.

After watching this video from Coltaine, it seems that this kind of Malarkey is gaining acceptance in scientific circles. Its truly disturbing how articles pointed out by Coltaine in his video highlight the significance of filtering out bad parts of female nature and behavior through written articles throughout history in modern times.

The one thing that stands out is that women seem to also be missing on the scientific front of things that involve women. The history of he medical if not scientific achievements of the abortion clinic in San Francisco seem to have become a model of how to run a political campaign.

But either men are covering up for their achievements. Or they just don’t want women put into the light of having the same tarnished image of men. If that’s true, then I think what it does is further the de evolution of the female humans as it does not bring to light that women are indeed just as capable as men when it comes to scientific efforts.

However, when you go into the scope of this, you find that women are either ashamed of their achievements, or are protected by others so that they are shielded from further understanding that there is a price to pay when it comes to such trivial things such as equality and feminism dogma in the scientific if not engineering realm.

It may even explain the particular basis of the emphasis of human disposability from a female perspective. If that hold true, then this would lead to more scientific research on why women choose professions where they have ultimate power. But lack the responsibility of that power.

For example, women are well known to be cruel as jailers of other women. There is plenty of evidence and articles of women being the worst tyrants during the Nazi regime. But they did so in fact excel in these positions due to their lack of humanity towards one another.

What strikes me as odd is that all of the prevailing accounts of this seem to have been hidden from history almost on purpose. This would lead us to today where we happen to give women full spread control over our governments and legislation. And only see that in all real world accounts, women are not only ineffective in these roles. They are also dangerous to the suppression of new technology that would benefit mankind as a whole.

It would also point out that women above all have NO intention of fixing problems. But to only extended them for their own purposes and gain.

IF we could get some scientific proof on this very notion, we could then in theory be able to for once point out that at least on a plain white paper level that women are not only not suited for positions of power. But we could point out these characteristics that they may point to that would enable future men to make better choices on who would be best to have as a partner of any kind in any relationship or work.

The thing that has been puzzling to me, is that if you take this same hypothesis to a panel of women and men, the overall propensity is to side with women even on scientific merits that are dubious. Basically, allowing greed or non scientific principle to be the motivator instead of the classic clinical approach to the truth. Or Demonstrable repeatable theory of the resulting hypothesis to any one problem that has a gray area.

Bottom line, if all the funding that is going in to things such as STEM will not produce any positive results from female preference, then for once, MEN could finally be able to make the argument that women will accept that it is dangerous for themselves to follow women leaders. Since women leaders of any field tend to have a bias towards themselves and have little in the way of caring about each other or their happiness.

The very idea, could rip all of the established female entities apart if women came to the same conclusion that women do not have their best interests in mind.

That would be some kind of revelation there. And it might start turning back the tide of all this male hate and distrust in our society.

It may even make Carnage give a damn. There’s always hope right? 🙂

Again thank you all for your input and expanding my mind. Hopefully, I get a chance to put this in good use one day in the political realm as well.

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[Y_Participant 4591]

You have written a very insightful post. Thank you for sharing.
If I may address your main points in your last post since I feel there are issues you have raised that need a response.

Firstly let us establish some guidelines – I submit that we as humans have not evolved past our basic nature that our forefathers were well acquainted with over two thousand years ago. Technologically and culturally we may have changed, but emotionally, ‘spiritually’ and instinct-wise we have not.

iMickey503 wrote:

It just alarms me that what I am seeing is that just as feminism is trying to belittle man’s accomplishments today. I think there is some serious sand in some orifices that want to push credit from man’s ingenuity of the past and categorize in order to further dismay mankind from future accomplishments.

This appears to be the situation in North America, the western bloc of the EU and also Australia, which represent at most about 15% of the 7.5 billion world population.

The remainder of the world is mainly male-centric – Middle East, Asia, Africa, Central and South America do not suffer excessively from feminist issues which threaten the social makeup. The men will not allow it.

The issues in North America and Europe will, I believe ultimately destroy these societies and a reset will take place. Again – this will not have significant impact elsewhere on cultures that have established patterns of male – female behaviour enforced or adopted through millennia.

iMickey503 wrote:

IF we could get some scientific proof on this very notion, we could then in theory be able to for once point out that at least on a plain white paper level that women are not only not suited for positions of power. But we could point out these characteristics that they may point to that would enable future men to make better choices on who would be best to have as a partner of any kind in any relationship or work.

Human civilisations have excluded females from certain types of activities including direct leadership roles and to roles outside the family nucleus. This is not by accident.

Most societies in different parts of the world had very similar rules and outcomes long before they traded cultural perspectives. These laws were to maintain social order as I believe these men know the harm females could inflict on society should their natures be allowed full expression.

I think the US and EU are experiencing just how dangerous and debilitating that breakdown in social order can be. This is not an intellectual problem but an emotive and social one. The response should be tempered along the same lines.

iMickey503 wrote:

The thing that has been puzzling to me, is that if you take this same hypothesis to a panel of women and men, the overall propensity is to side with women even on scientific merits that are dubious. .

Our forefathers knew that it was not possible for females to sit at the same table with men and reason things out. That is applying the assumption females are able to reason or apply logic or know how to compromise.

Regardless of how clever they claim to be, females only know how to use their positions to cudgel everyone else to submit one way or the other. For females there is really no ‘we’ – it is all about ‘me’.

So unless you are able to change the innate nature of females (or alternatively change that of men to obey females implicitly), there can be no joint view on an outcome that females will ever be happy with or hold themselves to for the good of society as a whole. This is where social disintegration starts and ends.

So in closing – this is not a situation where men should feel threatened as there are sufficient male-dominated societies worldwide to redress the social balance and the continuation of homo sapiens as a species. When I use the concept of ‘male-dominated’ – this is a technical term for the way society is regulated with no implication on associated social behaviourism as being ‘good’ or ‘bad’.

The issue in Western societies is trying to treat both male and females as a single androgynous character with the same qualities, abilities and lifestyles. Until this view has been debunked politically and socially and females are put back where they can do no harm the problems will continue.

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[ChristopherParticipant 2478]

Archeologist Micheal Cremo has documented fossils that reveal the presence of anatomically modern humans millions of years ago, but in the Darwinian account modern humans appeared only in the past 100,000 to 200,000 years.

The recent discovery of ancient massive cities underwater off the coast of India dated back 32000 years also challenges the current mainstream story of human history.

Imho human civilisation is much older than we were “taught in school”. Today scientists cannot adequately explain how many ancient structures were constructed such as the megaliths at Yangshan. There are structures around the world that indicate that ancient civilisations were advanced. Cities were submerged. Therefore sea levels rose. Knowledge was lost. Imho it is incorrect to assume that today we are at the peak of human civilisation.

Feminism was funded by bankers/politicians to create more taxpayers. MGTOW IS FREEDOM https://archive.org/details/mgtowisfreedomblurayready

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

Chris, can you point to any of this stuff? Sure I have seen the underwater photos, but everything about them just points to nowhere.

If this was really true, there would be other people talking about it. Maybe even some research. But I have found none.

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[ChristopherParticipant 2478]

iMickey503 wrote:

Chris, can you point to any of this stuff? Sure I have seen the underwater photos, but everything about them just points to nowhere. If this was really true, there would be other people talking about it. Maybe even some research. But I have found none.

Hi iMickey. Imho ‘truth’ on a number of subjects is in short supply in mainstream society. MGTOW is an example of this – a truth that currently is not widespread (probably much less than 1 % of the population) – while the rest of the population are under the delusion of the normality of a gynocentric ideology.

Im certainly not here to attempt to convert anyone to my view. We each have our own picture of reality based on what we have read (information can vary depending on your source) and on our experiences etc – and thats all fine with me. If you search for ‘truth’ you may find it in a process like putting together a jigsaw over time.

Imho as much confusion and illusion exists in ‘todays’ universities as truth – many socalled facts are built upon the premise of an accepted and promoted ‘ideology’ and data can be and has been manipulated to support various ideologies, eg, feminist ideology. Also newspapers and online media are owned by conglomerates and are censored/ filtered by algorithms, e.g., facebook, youtube and google. These sources cannot be trusted, for example, facebook uses algorithms to present you with ‘content it deems acceptable’ and filters down various political and other types of content; and based on the way youtube is shutting down MGTOW content.

Ancient architecture is ‘interesting’. Dawarka is an incredible discovery – remains of a huge underwater city twice the size of Manhattan – further research and excavation has been completely shut down. Osirion in Egypt is another interesting site. Ancient architecture and archeology in various parts of the world raise a number of challenging questions to the current mainstream accepted version of human history.

There are people talking about and researching such subjects but most of us with busy lives understandably dont have the time or inclination to. A number of professionals and scientists in various branches of society, eg, in pharma, health/life sciences, archeology, physics etc have been ostracised and even lost their jobs for challenging accepted ideologies. Such research is usually not funded. Still there are professionals and scientists that search for truth and there are also people that ‘ghost’ through their careers in a similar way that MGTOW ghost through gynocentric society. This is a MGTOW site so I will leave my comment there. Peace.

Feminism was funded by bankers/politicians to create more taxpayers. MGTOW IS FREEDOM https://archive.org/details/mgtowisfreedomblurayready

[Author]

Posts