Home › Forums › Blue Pill Hell › So apparently the Ghostbusters trailer response is hilarious.
This topic contains 36 replies, has 27 voices, and was last updated by Cap285 3 years, 10 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
So I watched the new Ghostbusters trailer and, you guessed it, it’s s~~~. It’s unfunny. It reminds me of Pixels, with terrible CGI and awful jokes. It makes me just sad that women can’t make up their own ideas anymore.
What makes this funny is the response to this film. Just look at the like/dislike bar of this film.
Meanwhile, I’m checking out MisterMetokur’s progress and found out that various white knights and feminazis are accusing this film of racism!
http://postimg.org/image/4q8mgrz8z/
http://postimg.org/image/eeoqb7ugt/
http://postimg.org/image/61mo9rrcd/
http://postimg.org/image/iipbuzyaf/
http://postimg.org/image/8hl33ubcv/
http://postimg.org/image/skifi31f3/
http://postimg.org/image/8jdeg86pr/
http://postimg.org/image/v2dfhvtax/
http://postimg.org/image/ml2949w43/They’re even bitching at the actresses who starred in the film.
The woman who called the people who disliked the trailer “baby-men” needs a little talking to. These “baby men” are the ones who liked and made Ghostbusters an iconic thing. These same “baby-men” created the Star Wars franchise, and you bitches do nothing but take these ideas and implement some social justice in them. F~~~ you.
It’s just a shame. Cucks and betas try to cater so much to women that they just end up being called racists. We can’t have good movies anymore. We have to cater to people only to end up with this response.
This is EXACTLY what happens when you cater to SJWs and women. This is it. This is the end result. Bitching and complaining. You can never make people happy. You can never satisfy their needs.
So don’t satisfy them.
Anonymous12Wow, I knew it was going to be bad but this is really bad. From the trailer alone it seems that –
1/ The Female Ghostbusters just don’t look like Science types, the original guys did.
2/ The Female Ghostbusters aren’t funny and lack any kind of charm or personality as well as being s~~~ actresses.
3/ It seems that no one was interested in doing this film and it shows.
4/ The SJW’s are right on it now and it is funny given that it was made for SJW’s as a “Girl Power” thing and now it is racist. Let’s face it, it is the funnier than any joke in the film.
Just read on IMDb that Sony are deleting negative posts about the film on Youtube, another thing that will come back and bite them.
Anonymous42GIRL POWER! I’m so excited I could just s~~~!
It’s John Wayne tonight for damn sure!!!
Ghost Busters my ass! More like Ball Busters! MY F~~~ING B~~~~!!! Just another s~~~ movie I don’t have to p~~~ myself off watching!Nope.
Don't stick your dick into anyone you aren't willing to put up with for eighteen years and nine months.
4/ The SJW’s are right on it now and it is funny given that it was made for SJW’s as a “Girl Power” thing and now it is racist.
So, if we go see the film, we are racist. But, if we do not go see the film, we are sexist.
Ryan Reynolds Deadpool film has a very good line about this type of subject. While Deadpool is fighting two women, Deadpool asks the women, is it more sexist to hit them, or not hit them. In the insanity of this day and age, this is a legitimate question.
Besides which. What made the original Ghostbuster good was the actor chemistry and that plot was all about the american dream of starting a business. Okay, it was strange business. But, it was still a business.
The original three ghostbusters were the three basic geeks archetypes. Peter was the pick up artist geek. Ray was the awkward geek. And Egon was the nerdy geek. With Winston being the sane man of this lunatic asylum.
The original Ghostbusters movie was inventive and fun. This film is looking more and more generic for all the wrong reasons.
What really annoys me is the movie producers of the new ghostbusters film completely ignored the source material. If they were going to have a all woman main cast, They could have at least made one of the female ghostbusters be Kylie Griffin. Kylie Griffin is the nice, goth genius women from the Ghostbusters Extreme series and IDW Ghostbusters comics. Kylie was a wonderful well rounded character and a nice addition to the Ghostbuster cast. But, the movie producers clearly even ignored Kylie as inspiration for the film.
Anonymous12Still won’t let me quote on here, @faust, I haven’t seen Deadpool yet but I do agree what is worse, hitting a woman or not hitting one? It really highlights how impossible equality really is in the end. You could compare a man hitting a woman to a big tough guy hitting a skinny geek.
A sexy Goth chick would have been quite good actually, that is another factor this film lacks – SEXY!
On another note,
This guy is my new hero, just he’s total straight talking.C~~~s never pass up executing ad hominem attacks.
That’s fine, the movie will tank miserably.
"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."
Anonymous6WTF? The original Ghostbusters were all guys, whats next? The Unicorn, the NAWALT and the Ugly?
tessyb810 minutes ago
aside from the confusion over whether or not this is a reboot or sequel, this film looks f~~~ing great!!!one of the best things is seeing all the whiny man-children coming out the woodwork because they’re no longer the centre of attention… you all need to grow a pair.
Show lessaaaaand there we have it. Classic man shaming technique number 3. “If you disagree with me or don’t give me what I want, you need to man up.”
Worse than being a classic ad hominem attack, the hallmark of losing an argument, it’s just cliche. Eeew.
"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,
Saw the trailer hours ago and SONY has virtually guaranteed this movie will suck massive feminist butt-plugs.
The only funny part was a female telling another female:
“no one is better at quantum physics than you”.white knights and feminazis are accusing this film of racism!
Because a black bitch is seen violently slapping and abusing a white bitch.
At least they c~~~ blame it on a man.If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.Watching the reactions will actually be more fun than watching this Nut Busters 2 movie.
One day everybody will understand that you simply cannot satisfy women.
Yeah, 0.39-0.42 pretty much sums it up for me. I’ll skip it.
C~~~s never pass up executing ad hominem attacks.
Yep, they’re digging deep into their (limited) repertoire over this.
Marriage is the process of finding out what kind of man your wife would have preferred.
So, if we go see the film, we are racist. But, if we do not go see the film, we are sexist.
Is there any possible way i can do both? With such an affront to the SJWs’ flower-like sense of dignity, they’d no doubt keel over from a massive, collective cis-white-male-induced stroke.
And then it’d be nice & quiet. And someone can re-remake Ghostbusters into something more closely resembling a 5-year-old-MattNYC’s favorite movie.
Bitches f~~~ed up Ghostbusters. Nothing is sacred.
Looks really stupid and not funny. “No one is better at quantum physics than you” Yeah right.
I like how they’re not even appreciative of the all female cast. Once they got that they found something else to whinge about in short order. Typical…
The c~~~ who wrote the man baby comment needs to take the advice and go find a dog and some peanut butter.
In closing…
You ruined Ghostbusters! What did it ever do to you? *chest punch*
Still won’t let me quote on here, @faust, I haven’t seen Deadpool yet but I do agree what is worse, hitting a woman or not hitting one? It really highlights how impossible equality really is in the end. You could compare a man hitting a woman to a big tough guy hitting a skinny geek.
A sexy Goth chick would have been quite good actually, that is another factor this film lacks – SEXY!
I mean, Kylie was a fun aspect to the Ghostbuster’s franchise. She was a cheerful goth, very intelligent, fangirl of the paranormal. Kylie’s character and personality added to the Ghostbuster’s franchise.
Also, Kylie offers a female ghostbuster character we can point to and compare these female ghostbuster characters to.
Keep in mind that they doubtless put the best parts of this crapfest into the trailer.
I’m still wondering what the f~~~ Sony was thinking when they greenlighted this. Seriously, in what world did this seem like a good idea? When I first heard about it a while back the first thing I thought was: “Well that’s going to bomb.” And I continue to be proven correct.
The only possible explanation for this idiocy that I can come up with is this obviously producer driven fiasco is actually an ashcan release so they don’t lose the rights to Ghostbusters, and they decided that since it’s a tax loss throwaway production anyways they might as well try to at least get some feminist brownie nosing points out of it.
The thing I hate the most is that they’re not calling this a remake.
The director has said it’s a “reboot,” but that it’s not in the same universe as the originals, that the characters from the originals are not in this movie (though actors may cameo), and that despite the trailer saying “30 YEARS AGO”, there is literally NO connection between this one and the first two movies.
No, it’s not a reboot. It’s a fragging REMAKE that was filmed to appease the SJW/feminist/white knight crowds.
Heck, the girls dancing on stage in this video would make better ‘Busters:
Anonymous42I would LOVE, F~~~ING LOVE IT if hollyweird would ask MGTOW’s advice on a movie, allow us to cut the living f~~~ out of it, pick the cast, and chew on it until we’re satisfied MEN will like it!
I’m betting ALL TIME BLOCK BUSTER! And you know I’m RIGHT!
Movies have become a dart board to point out feminism, they’re no longer entertaining (the hallmark of feminism).
well, as usual, see how pc and feminism destroys a classic movie.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678