So apparently the Ghostbusters trailer response is hilarious.

Topic by The Moth Attracted to the Flame

The Moth Attracted to the Flame

Home Forums Blue Pill Hell So apparently the Ghostbusters trailer response is hilarious.

This topic contains 36 replies, has 27 voices, and was last updated by Cap285  Cap285 3 years, 10 months ago.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 37 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #200406
    +13

    So I watched the new Ghostbusters trailer and, you guessed it, it’s s~~~. It’s unfunny. It reminds me of Pixels, with terrible CGI and awful jokes. It makes me just sad that women can’t make up their own ideas anymore.

    What makes this funny is the response to this film. Just look at the like/dislike bar of this film.

    Meanwhile, I’m checking out MisterMetokur’s progress and found out that various white knights and feminazis are accusing this film of racism!
    http://postimg.org/image/4q8mgrz8z/
    http://postimg.org/image/eeoqb7ugt/
    http://postimg.org/image/61mo9rrcd/
    http://postimg.org/image/iipbuzyaf/
    http://postimg.org/image/8hl33ubcv/
    http://postimg.org/image/skifi31f3/
    http://postimg.org/image/8jdeg86pr/
    http://postimg.org/image/v2dfhvtax/
    http://postimg.org/image/ml2949w43/

    They’re even bitching at the actresses who starred in the film.

    The woman who called the people who disliked the trailer “baby-men” needs a little talking to. These “baby men” are the ones who liked and made Ghostbusters an iconic thing. These same “baby-men” created the Star Wars franchise, and you bitches do nothing but take these ideas and implement some social justice in them. F~~~ you.

    It’s just a shame. Cucks and betas try to cater so much to women that they just end up being called racists. We can’t have good movies anymore. We have to cater to people only to end up with this response.

    This is EXACTLY what happens when you cater to SJWs and women. This is it. This is the end result. Bitching and complaining. You can never make people happy. You can never satisfy their needs.

    So don’t satisfy them.

    #200412
    +11

    Anonymous
    12

    Wow, I knew it was going to be bad but this is really bad. From the trailer alone it seems that –

    1/ The Female Ghostbusters just don’t look like Science types, the original guys did.

    2/ The Female Ghostbusters aren’t funny and lack any kind of charm or personality as well as being s~~~ actresses.

    3/ It seems that no one was interested in doing this film and it shows.

    4/ The SJW’s are right on it now and it is funny given that it was made for SJW’s as a “Girl Power” thing and now it is racist. Let’s face it, it is the funnier than any joke in the film.

    Just read on IMDb that Sony are deleting negative posts about the film on Youtube, another thing that will come back and bite them.

    #200414
    +8

    Anonymous
    42

    GIRL POWER! I’m so excited I could just s~~~!

    It’s John Wayne tonight for damn sure!!!
    Ghost Busters my ass! More like Ball Busters! MY F~~~ING B~~~~!!! Just another s~~~ movie I don’t have to p~~~ myself off watching!

    #200415
    +3
    BigD
    BigD
    Participant
    3024

    Nope.

    Don't stick your dick into anyone you aren't willing to put up with for eighteen years and nine months.

    #200416
    +9
    Faust For Science
    Faust For Science
    Participant
    22520

    4/ The SJW’s are right on it now and it is funny given that it was made for SJW’s as a “Girl Power” thing and now it is racist.

    So, if we go see the film, we are racist. But, if we do not go see the film, we are sexist.

    Ryan Reynolds Deadpool film has a very good line about this type of subject. While Deadpool is fighting two women, Deadpool asks the women, is it more sexist to hit them, or not hit them. In the insanity of this day and age, this is a legitimate question.

    Besides which. What made the original Ghostbuster good was the actor chemistry and that plot was all about the american dream of starting a business. Okay, it was strange business. But, it was still a business.

    The original three ghostbusters were the three basic geeks archetypes. Peter was the pick up artist geek. Ray was the awkward geek. And Egon was the nerdy geek. With Winston being the sane man of this lunatic asylum.

    The original Ghostbusters movie was inventive and fun. This film is looking more and more generic for all the wrong reasons.

    What really annoys me is the movie producers of the new ghostbusters film completely ignored the source material. If they were going to have a all woman main cast, They could have at least made one of the female ghostbusters be Kylie Griffin. Kylie Griffin is the nice, goth genius women from the Ghostbusters Extreme series and IDW Ghostbusters comics. Kylie was a wonderful well rounded character and a nice addition to the Ghostbuster cast. But, the movie producers clearly even ignored Kylie as inspiration for the film.

    #200417
    +3

    Anonymous
    12

    Still won’t let me quote on here, @faust, I haven’t seen Deadpool yet but I do agree what is worse, hitting a woman or not hitting one? It really highlights how impossible equality really is in the end. You could compare a man hitting a woman to a big tough guy hitting a skinny geek.

    A sexy Goth chick would have been quite good actually, that is another factor this film lacks – SEXY!

    On another note,
    This guy is my new hero, just he’s total straight talking.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtVRSlCy_A0

    #200418
    +6
    Experienced
    experienced
    Participant

    C~~~s never pass up executing ad hominem attacks.

    That’s fine, the movie will tank miserably.

    "It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

    #200419
    +10

    Anonymous
    6

    WTF? The original Ghostbusters were all guys, whats next? The Unicorn, the NAWALT and the Ugly?

    #200421
    +5
    Biggvs_Dickvs
    Biggvs_Dickvs
    Participant
    3725

    tessyb810 minutes ago
    aside from the confusion over whether or not this is a reboot or sequel, this film looks f~~~ing great!!!

    one of the best things is seeing all the whiny man-children coming out the woodwork because they’re no longer the centre of attention… you all need to grow a pair.
    Show less

    aaaaand there we have it. Classic man shaming technique number 3. “If you disagree with me or don’t give me what I want, you need to man up.”

    Worse than being a classic ad hominem attack, the hallmark of losing an argument, it’s just cliche. Eeew.

    "Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

    #200422
    +11
    Keymaster
    Keymaster
    Keymaster

    Saw the trailer hours ago and SONY has virtually guaranteed this movie will suck massive feminist butt-plugs.

    The only funny part was a female telling another female:
    “no one is better at quantum physics than you”.

    white knights and feminazis are accusing this film of racism!

    Because a black bitch is seen violently slapping and abusing a white bitch.
    At least they c~~~ blame it on a man.

    If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.
    #200428
    +8
    Dunn Goofd
    Dunn Goofd
    Participant
    119

    Watching the reactions will actually be more fun than watching this Nut Busters 2 movie.

    One day everybody will understand that you simply cannot satisfy women.

    #200464
    +4
    The Long Walk
    The Long Walk
    Participant
    1282

    Yeah, 0.39-0.42 pretty much sums it up for me. I’ll skip it.

    #200465
    +3
    Unicron
    Unicron
    Participant
    752

    C~~~s never pass up executing ad hominem attacks.

    Yep, they’re digging deep into their (limited) repertoire over this.

    Marriage is the process of finding out what kind of man your wife would have preferred.

    #200478
    +6
    MattNYC
    MattNYC
    Participant
    2329

    So, if we go see the film, we are racist. But, if we do not go see the film, we are sexist.

    Is there any possible way i can do both? With such an affront to the SJWs’ flower-like sense of dignity, they’d no doubt keel over from a massive, collective cis-white-male-induced stroke.

    And then it’d be nice & quiet. And someone can re-remake Ghostbusters into something more closely resembling a 5-year-old-MattNYC’s favorite movie.

    Bitches f~~~ed up Ghostbusters. Nothing is sacred.

    #200551
    +3
    Rennie
    Rennie
    Participant

    Looks really stupid and not funny. “No one is better at quantum physics than you” Yeah right.

    I like how they’re not even appreciative of the all female cast. Once they got that they found something else to whinge about in short order. Typical…

    The c~~~ who wrote the man baby comment needs to take the advice and go find a dog and some peanut butter.

    In closing…

    You ruined Ghostbusters! What did it ever do to you? *chest punch*

    #200592
    +2
    Faust For Science
    Faust For Science
    Participant
    22520

    Still won’t let me quote on here, @faust, I haven’t seen Deadpool yet but I do agree what is worse, hitting a woman or not hitting one? It really highlights how impossible equality really is in the end. You could compare a man hitting a woman to a big tough guy hitting a skinny geek.

    A sexy Goth chick would have been quite good actually, that is another factor this film lacks – SEXY!

    I mean, Kylie was a fun aspect to the Ghostbuster’s franchise. She was a cheerful goth, very intelligent, fangirl of the paranormal. Kylie’s character and personality added to the Ghostbuster’s franchise.

    Also, Kylie offers a female ghostbuster character we can point to and compare these female ghostbuster characters to.

    #200602
    +2
    Sidecar
    sidecar
    Participant
    35837

    Keep in mind that they doubtless put the best parts of this crapfest into the trailer.

    I’m still wondering what the f~~~ Sony was thinking when they greenlighted this. Seriously, in what world did this seem like a good idea? When I first heard about it a while back the first thing I thought was: “Well that’s going to bomb.” And I continue to be proven correct.

    The only possible explanation for this idiocy that I can come up with is this obviously producer driven fiasco is actually an ashcan release so they don’t lose the rights to Ghostbusters, and they decided that since it’s a tax loss throwaway production anyways they might as well try to at least get some feminist brownie nosing points out of it.

    #200651
    +2
    Governor Megachris%
    Governor Megachris%
    Participant
    3584

    The thing I hate the most is that they’re not calling this a remake.

    The director has said it’s a “reboot,” but that it’s not in the same universe as the originals, that the characters from the originals are not in this movie (though actors may cameo), and that despite the trailer saying “30 YEARS AGO”, there is literally NO connection between this one and the first two movies.

    No, it’s not a reboot. It’s a fragging REMAKE that was filmed to appease the SJW/feminist/white knight crowds.

    Heck, the girls dancing on stage in this video would make better ‘Busters:

    #200656
    +2

    Anonymous
    42

    I would LOVE, F~~~ING LOVE IT if hollyweird would ask MGTOW’s advice on a movie, allow us to cut the living f~~~ out of it, pick the cast, and chew on it until we’re satisfied MEN will like it!

    I’m betting ALL TIME BLOCK BUSTER! And you know I’m RIGHT!

    Movies have become a dart board to point out feminism, they’re no longer entertaining (the hallmark of feminism).

    #200704
    +3
    Hellraider
    hellraider
    Participant
    2837

    well, as usual, see how pc and feminism destroys a classic movie.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 37 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.