Silly women…worrying about men you need to worry about robots.

[MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To GiveParticipant 6635]

Under the radar companies are adjusting to these idiots because they know the white knight government at some point will force some stupid policy like paying 100k for females working at McDonald’s…maybe not?..I thought “yes means no” would never become law. As you can see from some of the jobs in this article the first jobs to go will be the laydeez,you go guurl,”office AC is to high” receptionist c~~~s we all know of will be replaced with robotic software.They predict somewhere between 10-15 years,I believe sooner because the heat is on to raise minimum wage because SJW/t~~~s cant make a living flipping burgers and its the corporations greed behind it all.Male dominant fields are somewhat safe because of the need for brain and muscle(cant trust robots to build skyscrapers),besides robots at this point are very repetitive I dont know how far along we are at having bots correct mistakes? Stay tuned…
http://www.cnet.com/news/your-next-insurance-agent-will-be-a-robot/

Never lose sight of what brought you here.

[WhackerGuy2030Participant 999]

There’s a big mistake the minimum wagers are making when lobbying for more money. The welfare queens will quit their jobs in droves when they realize they will fall off the far side of the sweet spot that drives their huge benefits.

It’s a complex tax and income discussion, but they better be careful what they wish for. The cost of employing low skill workers won’t cause the automation, it’ll be the refusal to work for high wages that cut into welfare that will cause the robots to assemble and dispense mcmuffins and coffee.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

You are mostly right.

However, everyone assumes that STEM is a men’s realm. It is not.

In my S field females get more degrees than men at the BS level. At the MS and PhD level the data is skewed because of the high amount of foreign men grad students.

My point is STEM doesn’t belong to men.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To GiveParticipant 6635]

WhackerGuy2030 wrote:

it’ll be the refusal to work for high wages that cut into welfare that will cause the robots to assemble and dispense mcmuffins and coffee.

And even that will be men’s fault.

Never lose sight of what brought you here.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

WhackerGuy2030 wrote:

The cost of employing low skill workers won’t cause the automation, it’ll be the refusal to work for high wages that cut into welfare that will cause the robots to assemble and dispense mcmuffins and coffee.

Seriously…if our government keeps expanding and giving more “free” stuff and I end up paying in a 60%+ tax I’ll just retire. What good is working a lot of hours at a 100k a year job when they take most of it in taxes when I could just work a joke job a couple days a week for something to do, qualify for a bunch of “freebie” programs, and maybe do a little work under the table if I want extra spending money…I’ll literally have the same amount of disposable income compared to the responsible citizens working and supporting me.

[Anonymous 7]

Jan Sobieski wrote:

My point is STEM doesn’t belong to men.

Stem is over 70 percent male.

There are extra programs pushing women to go into stem as well but still no luck they need their art and gender studies bulls~~~.

The way females think is not that of a stem field.

[hellraiderParticipant 2837]

yup, i think sexbots will be the next big business.

Why buy a car to atract women when you can buy a sexbot much more cheaply?

And i do think a lot of unskilled jobs will be replaced by robots.

And, as usual, the gynocentric goverment will just increase the taxes to pay for lazy, stupid and imcompetent women.

[narwhalParticipant]

I’m not exactly seeing how this ties to women specifically. It’s the natural progression of things. We come up with a cheaper way to solve a problem, thus making workers who made a living off the old way become obsolete. The cheaper way creates new jobs, and new problems. We make up the difference by inventing new problems.

As the article pointed out, “Cars may have made the buggy whip maker unnecessary, but they also created the car mechanic.” However, what they didn’t say is that the car mechanic has be more skilled then the car mechanic. That is almost always the trend.

Untrained labor is going to become less and less useful. The question is, with the untrained become leeches living off the trained, or will they learn to start pulling their wait?

Ok. Then do it.

[MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To GiveParticipant 6635]

narwhal wrote:

I’m not exactly seeing how this ties to women specifically.

Im going to make a good assumption that most of these jobs being replaced are repetitive jobs,which brings me to assuming that most of those jobs are occupied by women. Clerks,Customer Service,Check out etc. Its been well documented on other articles i’ve read that the list of jobs that will be the first to go are generally vacant by females. Of course the process will continue but will women be willing to continue with the process?

Never lose sight of what brought you here.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

Anonymous wrote:

Jan.Sobieski wrote:

My point is STEM doesn’t belong to men.

Stem is over 70 percent male.

There are extra programs pushing women to go into stem as well but still no luck they need their art and gender studies bulls~~~.

The way females think is not that of a stem field.

Sir,
In the S field you are wrong. My Data says that at the BS level females are graduating more than men. I have posted it previously.

Dude, I am a S worker, I’ve been an S worker for 20+ years, and I have the most recent info from my national professional organization.

Please show me your data…here is mine (older data). The excess males at the MS and PhD level are male foreign (Chinese) students.

http://pubs.acs.org/cen/email/html/cen_85_i38_8538acsnews.html

The point is, don’t fall for the media hype.

Your arrogance will be your undoing.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

@ Lottery,

Sir,

You are young. You fall into the media. Lies within lies. I’m not trying to be an ass but women are actually smoking men in STEM. Chemistry is the central science. The normal degree for medical, dental, optical, pharmacy, etc.

Sure , 60% of Engeering are men. whatever, total STEM isn’t a mens world. If you believe the lies don’t be surprised someday.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Jan Sobieski wrote:

However, everyone assumes that STEM is a men’s realm. It is not.

It is after graduation. Very few female STEM graduates can cut it in the real world, which is usually the case for mollycoddled “graduates”.

It’s sickening how much taxpayer money is wasted on female med school students when so many of the drop out of medicine in just a few years after graduation.

[FrankOneParticipant 1419]

Jan: I work in the ‘E’ or Engineering field of ‘STEM’. Anyway, for us, it’s about 19% female overall (across all Engineering disciplines, 2013 data).

For ALL STEM, as of 2013, women comprised 36% of STEM, and thus, by difference, men, 64% — so, not over 70% as one poster stated. This data goes to 2013. https://www.aps.org/programs/education/statistics/womenmajors.cfm — but really, little change — total STEM has hovered around 36% female for nearly 15 years. So I’d disagree about women ‘smoking’ men in STEM overall, but you can certainly make a STRONG case they are smoking men in the medical sciences.

Now, in Engineering, it’s closer to 19% women GRADUATES (I’ll get to percent practicing momentarily). Chemistry is a science the has a LOT of women; it was over 50% for a time, and is now on a slow decline but hovering right around 50% — it was at 48% as of 2013. So of course, all your figures are dead on there, Jan.

There is quite a bit of variation in Engineering https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwiDgar489HKAhWEyj4KHe7ODksQFggjMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.asee.org%2Fpapers-and-publications%2Fpublications%2Fcollege-profiles%2F2011-profile-engineering-statistics.pdf&usg=AFQjCNHZfQzO4mohCIaEl4tFJc7d-TB2Gg&cad=rja , too — loads of women in Environmental Engineering (44%), and Chemical (my field) at 33% — but VERY few in Mechanical, Electrical, or computer science (all around 12%) — these are 2011 figures — fairly recent — year-on-year changes aren’t that great at this point.

Sidecar: If you can get through all its PC bulls~~~ excuses about ‘gendered concerns’ causing women who actually earned engineering degrees, for subsequently quickly quitting the profession, and just look at the numbers, this link provides some insight: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/12/female-engineers_n_5668504.html — while women make up ~20% of [Engineering] degrees granted, they make up only 11% of practicing engineers because they leave the field or go to Almighty Management. You know, those who can, do, those who can’t, manage, hahahaha.

[FrankOneParticipant 1419]

Jan: I work in the ‘E’ or Engineering field of ‘STEM’. Anyway, for us, it’s about 19% female overall (across all Engineering disciplines, 2013 data).

For ALL STEM, as of 2013, women comprised 36% of STEM, and thus, by difference, men, 64% — so, not over 70% as one poster stated. This data goes to 2013. https://www.aps.org/programs/education/statistics/womenmajors.cfm — but really, little change — total STEM has hovered around 36% female for nearly 15 years. So I’d disagree about women ‘smoking’ men in STEM overall, but you can certainly make a STRONG case they are smoking men in the medical sciences.

Now, in Engineering, it’s closer to 19% women GRADUATES (I’ll get to percent practicing momentarily). Chemistry is a science the has a LOT of women; it was over 50% for a time, and is now on a slow decline but hovering right around 50% — it was at 48% as of 2013. So of course, all your figures are dead on there, Jan.

There is quite a bit of variation in Engineering http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwiDgar489HKAhWEyj4KHe7ODksQFggjMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.asee.org%2Fpapers-and-publications%2Fpublications%2Fcollege-profiles%2F2011-profile-engineering-statistics.pdf&usg=AFQjCNHZfQzO4mohCIaEl4tFJc7d-TB2Gg&cad=rja , too — loads of women in Environmental Engineering (44%), and Chemical (my field) at 33% — but VERY few in Mechanical, Electrical, or computer science (all around 12%) — these are 2011 figures — fairly recent — year-on-year changes aren’t that great at this point.

Sidecar: If you can get through all its PC bulls~~~ excuses about ‘gendered concerns’ causing women who actually earned engineering degrees, for subsequently quickly quitting the profession, and just look at the numbers, this link provides some insight: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/12/female-engineers_n_5668504.html — while women make up ~20% of [Engineering] degrees granted, they make up only 11% of practicing engineers because they leave the field or go to Almighty Management. You know, those who can, do, those who can’t, manage, hahahaha.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

@frankone,

Thanks for the info.

One of the import points about this a BS Chem degree is the generally accepted path to things like med school, dental school, etc. Do other degrees make it, yes, but I would submit that is how women are moving ahead. That is why IMHO that you have seen the vast growth in females going into chemistry, so they can go to med school.

It isn’t a good thing that the females go into management. Then they get to make decisions like who gets hired, raises, bonuses.

My major point is I don’t want to see men become complacent and say STEM is in the bag or a sure thing for men these days. It isn’t. I’ve seen less qualified (a BS in biology hired for chemist positions) females being hired over qualified men.

So if management makes to decision that having a less qualified female engineer (Enviromental E hired for a ChemE) it will happen. Oh yes, the qualifed men will have to pick up the slack.

Can you explain why females go into ChemE but not mechanical? Both seem equally as hard.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[FrankOneParticipant 1419]

Jan: I can’t explain why women prefer Chem. Eng. over, say, Mech. Engineering, I don’t think it’s easier than Mechanical — OR harder to any significant extent. Really, the first two years of most Engineering disciplines share most of the same courses.

I’d say Management is as much about politics as anything. I was only half joking when I said those who can, do, and those who can’t, manage.

You’re absolutely right about women being at parity in Chemistry due to their pursuing medical fields.

[Anonymous 11]

Jan Sobieski wrote:

I’ve seen less qualified (a BS in biology hired for chemist positions) females being hired over qualified men.

A Biology student has had a lot of bench lab training so they are a cheap substitute for bench lab work. I know from my prior science endeavors that the women were excellent at following rote general methods laid out by others. I used to be stunned by their general inability to troubleshoot or handle novel situations. They tended to fold whenever confronted with a problem.

Since I moved over to T, the elites are nearly exclusively men. Troubleshooting is one skill where men absolutely are dominant.

[Author]

Posts