Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Showing Boobs to make a political statement
Tagged: breasts, clothing, Feminist, protest, sumo suits, topless, womens liberation
This topic contains 24 replies, has 20 voices, and was last updated by uchibenkei 3 years, 9 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Referring to the article that can be read here:
http://www.thelocal.se/20160504/why-i-bared-my-breasts-for-a-school-photoShort Summary:
A Swedish girl posed top-less for a school photo. She was encouraged to do so by her classmates in order to make a political statement. She felt it was unfair that it’s not a problem for guys to take of their shirts, but not women.I seriously can’t shake off the feeling that she literally got duped into this by some of her classmates:
“I think you should make a political statement, perhaps you should pose for a picture top-less”.Let them flaunt their floppers as much as they want. Doesn’t affect me.
The problem is it won’t stop there, eventually they’ll demand to wander around in public, in broad daylight with no clothes on at all.
Magua understand white man is a dog to his woman…
And how many times have you seen guys with their shirts off in in a school photo? None. Because men have decency.
"One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K
If I ever see a woman making a statement in that way, I hope I have the nerve to ask her about what she’s doing, and then say “eh, I give ’em a -insert number- out of ten.” depending on how nice they are.
Just a misogynist virgin hiding away in his mother's basement. Nothing to see here...
Sweden
We just thought somebody should take a stand and show her boobs and it just felt natural.
This spells exhibitionism in its core. You want to be politically active like that, but you don’t want to be considered sex objects.
And its corresponding articles are just as disgusting.
More proof that Sweden is f~~~ed.
The nude picture is on this Swedish site, for those interested.
http://www.rtlnieuws.nl/editienl/zweedse-topless-op-schoolfoto-als-een-man-het-mag-dan-ik-ook
Women in Ontario have the “right” to walk around topless as long as they are not showing their breasts in a sexually provocative manner. Guess how many actually do it. 0, zero, zilch, nada. it’s just a stupid game to them to see if they can get what they want. no women, or very few, actually want to walk around without a shirt.
I bathe in the tears of single moms.
Because, vagina. It’s funny how feminists complain we perv at their flesh and don’t look at their eyes if they wear low-cut tops and deliberately expose cleavage. Their response is to go topless, exposing more flesh? A true clothing protest by women against men would look like this –
#ManOut
Women in Ontario have the “right” to walk around topless as long as they are not showing their breasts in a sexually provocative manner. Guess how many actually do it. 0, zero, zilch, nada. it’s just a stupid game to them to see if they can get what they want. no women, or very few, actually want to walk around without a shirt.
How does that work? Doesn’t that run afoul of indecent exposure laws? Especially if they’re old.
Women in Ontario have the “right” to walk around topless as long as they are not showing their breasts in a sexually provocative manner. Guess how many actually do it. 0, zero, zilch, nada. it’s just a stupid game to them to see if they can get what they want. no women, or very few, actually want to walk around without a shirt.
How does that work? Doesn’t that run afoul of indecent exposure laws? Especially if they’re old.
If a woman is riding her bike or going for a walk and takes off her shirt and bra, no problem. The police might stop her but they won’t charge her and if they did, she would beat it. When this first passed, strip clubs tried to take advantage by having their strippers outside topless but they got in trouble because they were being sexually provocative. I guess they were rubbing their breasts and trying to turn guys on. It’s a gray area but it doesn’t matter because 99.99999% of women don’t want to be topless in public anyway. Even the women who fought for this “right” don’t use it. Even on the beach you don’t see it like you do in europe.
For men, indecent exposure is whipping out your c~~~ in public. That’s what it is for women now too but with their vaginas.
I bathe in the tears of single moms.
Referring to the article that can be read here:
http://www.thelocal.se/20160504/why-i-bared-my-breasts-for-a-school-photoShort Summary:
A Swedish girl posed top-less for a school photo. She was encouraged to do so by her classmates in order to make a political statement. She felt it was unfair that it’s not a problem for guys to take of their shirts, but not women.I seriously can’t shake off the feeling that she literally got duped into this by some of her classmates:
“I think you should make a political statement, perhaps you should pose for a picture top-less”.Acting out by behaving like a child is anything but a political statement. It’s just confirmation of being an idiot.
The Children of Doom... Doom's Children. They told my lord the way to the Mountain of Power. They told him to throw down his sword and return to the Earth... Ha! Time enough for the Earth in the grave.her t~~~ are disappointing.
They are tiny what kind of statement is that.
A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!
“I think it’s a social construct that we should think of breasts as such a big deal.”
In a way, she is right, as there are African societies where the women go topless. However, there is nothing inherently wrong with social constructs. And there most definitely is a biological aspect to this. It is also a social construct to pierce your ears, where makeup, jewelry, etc. Not following those social constructs will not have nearly the same impact as going topless.
And I should add that weddings, wedding rings, dates, etc are also social constructs.
Ok. Then do it.
It is legal in Texas as well, I saw only one woman doing it when I lived there. It could be legal to go around naked in all countries for all that I care but I am sure only the attractive people would be using the right to do so. So all problems in the world are solved and we are chasing for the attractive people problems? And these people should really cut the bulls~~~ that male and female breasts are the same. They are not the same biologically and definitely not the same sexually, who the f~~~ do they think they are kidding?
Notice how it is never the chick’s with a nice pair.
Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.
Anonymous12Women, especially white women are being conditioned to be whores, it is part of the overall plan that Feminism is a part of, Feminism doesn’t like women anymore than we do.
Her t~~~ look like man boobs and what a mangina standing next to her with the pasties.
It is legal in Texas as well, I saw only one woman doing it when I lived there. It could be legal to go around naked in all countries for all that I care but I am sure only the attractive people would be using the right to do so. So all problems in the world are solved and we are chasing for the attractive people problems? And these people should really cut the bulls~~~ that male and female breasts are the same. They are not the same biologically and definitely not the same sexually, who the f~~~ do they think they are kidding?
I’m a Texan and never knew this. Never SEEN it actually.
Which proves the point that even if it’s legalized most women won’t do it.
Her statement sounds like ..
“Look at ME!I’m a f~~~ing IDIOT!”
ATTENTION WHORE.- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678