Should we go back to patriarchy?

[ImAMenber12Participant 73]

Women usually fall into line under patriarchy, like sandman says. DO you think going back to patriarchy would help significantly?

 

One does not simply GO BACK to patriarchy

[Governor Megachris%Participant 3584]

“Back” to patriarchy would mean that we were under one in the first place.  I’d be one to argue we never were.  Even when women didn’t have the right to vote (among other things) and feminism tarnished everything to be even more in favor of women, men were still working to either raise a family or impress a lady most of the time.  I think back to even in the old Greek tales, where the women were practically distractions or the main focus of a male character.  Society has always been gynocentric or hypergamous, as well as sex-obsessed.

[Anonymous 1]

Oh, please, don’t.

Patriarchy only existed, as far as I can tell, on periods of time where technology was not advanced enough for women to contribute. So men was forced to take the bulk of the work and leadership in order for the whole group to survive. Once Industrial Revolution came, though, patriarchy went out through the window, and women know that. But they kept the myth cause being labeled a victim gives them the power of demand compensation for inexistent crimes.

Going back to patriarchy is what FEMINISM is driving for. They want men to assume all the responsibility, while women get all the benefits/rights. The only thing about feminism though, is that they just don’t hide that anymore.

Either under the old label (where men have their ego inflated), or the new “progressive” one (where don’t get even their ego cared for), a patriarchy would not benefit men… at all!

So, should we go back to patriarchy? Hell, freaking, no.

[The Moth Attracted to the FlameParticipant 2982]

Anonymous wrote:

Oh, please, don’t. Patriarchy only existed, as far as I can tell, on periods of time where technology was not advanced enough for women to contribute. So men was forced to take the bulk of the work and leadership in order for the whole group to survive. Once Industrial Revolution came, though, patriarchy went out through the window, and women know that. But they kept the myth cause being labeled a victim gives them the power of demand compensation for inexistent crimes. Going back to patriarchy is what FEMINISM is driving for. They want men to assume all the responsibility, while women get all the benefits/rights. The only thing about feminism though, is that they just don’t hide that anymore. Either under the old label (where men have their ego inflated), or the new “progressive” one (where don’t get even their ego cared for), a patriarchy would not benefit men… at all! So, should we go back to patriarchy? Hell, freaking, no.

I can actually agree with this. Unless people ignored women when they talked about a patriarchy existing while a patriarchy actually exists, women thrive on playing the victims of patriarchy.

[FermatParticipant 3478]

We absolutely should not. Then the same cycle of female opposition will occur again. When the economy tanks and social values are plundered by liberal feminism/gynocracy, of course women will want men to solve their problems and try to reinstate the male patriarchy. Patriarchy is simply traditional male servitude. If we started this patriarchy today, 100 or so years from now, women will just complain and rebel once again. Is this the kind of vicious cycle anyone wants? I for one do not.

I have discovered a truly remarkable list of reasons why women are not necessary for a happy life, but alas this margin is too small to contain it.

[UntamedParticipant]

Boy, that’s a greag question.
I agree with my fellows here. We very seldom were under a patriarchy as described by out adversaries.
Maybe when Moses lead the Israelite out of Egypt. That rule was a Patriarchy, if we discount what his wife and her entourage had to say.
Wemins pride themselves to say “Behind every great Man is a great woman.” But yet they bitch about Patriarchy.
Real Patriarchy is what they are against. A society and families lead by Men who want to build something for the sake of future generations, not endulge themselves in raping the natural state of the world.

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[ImAMenber12Participant 73]

I guess its very hard (if not impossible). I agree COMPLETELY with this sandman video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njY8jFWpD1k – regarding the future.

[UntamedParticipant]

It’s a great video. Sandman lays it out perfectly and there ain’t arguing the logic of it. Some t~~~ will try, but she’ll only expose her own embarassement.

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[Anonymous 25]

There’s no such thing as patriarchy. Until someone can pick it up and hand me some to prove otherwise, it doesn’t exist.

It would have to be a process if anything and it has been scientifically proven that men are gender neutral in how they reach decisions and woman and women are gender biased in favour of their own gender by a factor of 4 to 1. Science proves patriarchy doesn’t exist and woman are the sexist ones who hate men.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Yeah, sure patriarchy.

 

Patriarchy 17th century

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[FrankyParticipant 2338]

Translation:

-Hey guys do we put the chains back on ourselves, all the while saying how great it is to be  privileged to work for women again?

No patriarchy for me thank you.

[RoyDalParticipant]

I’m too happy, and too busy, to want to get sucked back into the traditional men’s roles. From what I gather from writers like Dickens and Austen, the patriarchy was not all that a good deal for men anyhow.

In Shakespeare’s Taming of the Shrew, yes the shrew got tamed although it took a concerted effort of verbal bullying and brain washing. Now consider the “nice” sister. She turned into a nickle plated bitch the day after her wedding. So, even in 1600-whatever, women behaved much the same as they do now, and they got away with it much as they do now.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[BurgundyParticipant 1525]

If Patriarchy really existed, why is it that we enforce young men into service to be killed, instead of women?  If Patriarchy existed, why is it always women and children first to life boats?

 

Yeah f~~~ that, it only existed in some old dark age, and even then it was men eating each other, like women eat each other.

 

What MGTOW and probably men in general would thrive under, is pure Free Market, and no government to tax or enforce you to pay single moms, through high taxes ect.  Where you pay the a some security to protect citizens a monthly fee, like netflix, or the doctor, as long you were healthy, and he wouldn’t get a dime till you were healthy again, to encourage house visits from the doctor to actually check on his clients.

 

Freedom is what’s best for men, some might want someone to follow, but MGTOWs would lead their own paths.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Here’s a photo essay of what the patriarchy was like for men only two or three generations ago. I think in this age of labor saving devices, structural unemployment is a bigger danger than grueling manual labor; neither is an attractive prospect.

(You might want to turn the sound down, unless you are a fan of techno rock. BTW, I’m glad The Mayor is back up and running. I hope he keeps on keeping on without any more harassment.)

MGTOW : THE DISPOSABLE MALE – MAYOR of MGTOWN 2

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[ImAMenber12Participant 73]

Women that say that they are pro-patriarchy are really saying that they are pro-men slavery. It’s f~~~ed up. The only way to truly fix the century-long damage path of feminism, is to just walk away. sometimes the best way to fix whats going on, is to not do anything.

[ImAMenber12Participant 73]

I just hope that the Gynocentric bulls~~~ genie will continue to keep MGTOW running.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

There is no such thing as a “patriarchy” or “patriarchal society”.

Pretend you are in a “society” made up of 10 men and 10 women. And one man gets off his butt and invents the internet, or builds an airplane, or composes an opera like Mozart, or answers one of the Universes most important questions…..

Is that society “patriarchal”?

No.

Its just a society where men make the initiative to DO something like inventing the internet, or making money in the free market, or breaking records previously set by other men.

There’s no such thing as a patriarchy.
It’s called the Real World.

It turns out in this “Real World”, men happened to actually DO something. We are the only ones who show up to rebuild after disasters, make decisions, and take the initiative to make everything – even sex with women – happen. Call it whatever you want, but what it’s actually called is: the truth.

Women don’t make the same initiative. Just look at the way they sit back with their arms and legs folded waiting for some guy to want to bang her. The guy’s gotta do every thing there too. Including PAYING for sh*t. And and a girl will EXPECT men to. If we waited around for WOMEN to do something of real significance…. we would still be waiting.

Women don’t live in a “patriarchy”.
They live in a LAZY-archy.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[ScandinavianParticipant 590]

I agree with the choir: the term patriarchy is not correct, if it ever was. But let’s switch it for “going back to a more traditionalist society/family”, then I think we can perhaps agree on what scenario we’re discussing?

As for me; no way! I absolutely love this way of life! I support only myself and help individuals I choose to help, not being expected to just because they were born with a vagina. Traditionalism is the new feminism as the latter backfired on them royally, but now it’s too late, their damage is done. Quite ironic as most of us wouldn’t be here if it wasn’t for modern feminism.

[MonkeyMindParticipant 5340]

Personally, I really don’t care for the word Patriarchy because it has so many connotations, conjectures and hearsay from the feminist camp that it’s really hard to ground it in reality, and even if we could, feminists would change the definition to whatever suits their agenda from one month to the next.
Even under a tradionalist lifestyle the man basically worked like a slave to provide for his family. The lack of government provisions and welfare is what made the marriage a co-dependance along with the threat of social ostrasisation if either man or woman strayed from their agreement. Also work was a lot more hazardous in years gone by. It’s no co-incidence that feminists started beating the oppression drum only after working for a living got a hell of a lot easier.

[Anonymous 11]

Women manipulated “The Patriarchs” just like they do men today.

 

[Author]

Posts