Sexual Risk Orders

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

The man, in his 40s, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was acquitted in 2015 at a retrial after claiming the alleged victim had consented.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-35385227
An interim sexual risk order, initially imposed in December, has been extended for four months by magistrates in York. It requires the man disclose any planned sexual activity to the police or face up to five years in prison.

“Sexual Harm Prevention Orders and Sexual Risk Orders were introduced by the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014. They replace the previous Sexual Offences Prevention Orders, Risk of Sexual Harm Orders and Foreign Travel Orders which were introduced by the Sexual Offences Act 2003.

Sexual Risk Orders can be made where a person has done an act of a sexual nature as a result of which there is reasonable cause to believe that it is necessary for such an order to be made, even if they have never been convicted. They replace the previous Risk of Sexual Harm Orders.

The court needs to be satisfied that the order is necessary for protecting the public, or any particular members of the public, from sexual harm from the defendant; or protecting children or vulnerable adults generally, or any particular children or vulnerable adults, from sexual harm from the defendant outside the United Kingdom.”

[Blue SkiesParticipant 15665]

poor guy. This is so bulls~~~.

I would tell this guy to buy a couple of fleshlights.

MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

[The Moth Attracted to the FlameParticipant 2982]

This is an excruciating story. But I posted this a while ago.

Man Ordered to Tell Police If He Plans to Have Sex

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

I am actually surprised they haven’t enacted the laws for castration of “sex offenders” yet.

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[RoyDalParticipant]

Russky wrote:

I am actually surprised they haven’t enacted the laws for castration of “sex offenders” yet.

The Nazis actually did.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

Sad as this is … well .. not sad .. DISGUSTING

It will only drive more men away… and that’s a good thing.

The system is now so openly hostile to men … they can no longer hide it.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

….if the police beleve…even if they have never been convicted of a crime.

So much for due process.

Keep driving men away.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[AttonParticipant]

Broad and completely unrestricted legal code, what next.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[hellraiderParticipant 2837]

Just another pearl of gynocentric insanaty.

This is why the mgtow movement is growing exponentialy.

[narwhalParticipant]

The reality is that the woman who falsely made the claim is the risk, not him.

Ok. Then do it.

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

I feel sorry for these guys.
The legal system is heavily biased towards women. Men are targets.
If some guy does get involved with one of these barracudas, please consider consent options and maybe audio/video documentation.
Thanks

[Author]

Posts