Sexbots decried by prominent Feminist newspaper

[Anonymous 38]

Just seen this article in the Guardian (British edition).

Suzanne Moore of the Guardian has launched an incoherent attack on the rise of sexbots, because apparently it’s objectifying women. As if dildos haven’t objectified and replaced the need for men for decades.

Translation: because sexbots will remove women’s primary source of power over men.

Typical, intellectually dishonest drivel from a (supposed) ‘liberal’ elite. What I find most encouraging is the number of red-pilled responses BTL. I’ve been posting on this site for a while and even a year ago you would scarcely see such comments. TRP and MGTOW is rising every day.

Why? Because it’s self-evident.

It’s already been said, but expect much more of this hypocritical tripe as sexbots become more mainstream.

Let me re-write that headline for you love:

Sex robots: innovation driven by male masturbatory fantasy is not a revolution

[Bob DylanParticipant 1352]

Anonymous wrote:

As if dildos haven’t objectified and replaced the need for men for decades.

Maybe more than decades…lol…

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2908415/The-sex-toys-dating-28-000-years-Ancient-phalluses-stone-dried-camel-dung-started-trend-sex-aids.html

“dried camel dung ?” It figures

..it ain't me babe...it ain't me you're looking for, babe...

[AntipathyParticipant 4901]

Dildo’s have been the best selling sex toy on amazon for a long time, but when men want a toy they lose their minds … because they know that unlike men, all they have to offer is sex, they are dead inside so if men can replace the one thing they have left … they are done.

[Point Of No ReturnParticipant 4074]

[sarc on] Please, please, think of the robots! Don’t hurt them! Treat them with respect! [sarc off]

Know when it is your duty to give them zero explanations for your actions.

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

Frankly, what I do with my body is no woman’s business. Women shouldn’t even be involved in the discussion.

Oh because the toy is a female replica, that gives them a say? Well babies that are aborted are actual males, so you can stop complaining about men being involved in that discussion.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[Anonymous 8]

I’m skeptical, the robots sound costly and would require maintenance I’m not sure the juice would be worth the squeeze. Unless of course the robots soak their own vaginas in the sink.

Planned obsolescence, ain’t that but a bitch, welcome to the industrial revolution 2.0.

[Anonymous 25]

She’s just been hurt and she’s bitter at men. She probably lives in her mum’s basement

Must be tough on her when no man wants and and would rather have a sex robot. I can empathise, but I hope she gets proper mental health treatment before she goes full psycho and hurts someone

[Anonymous 5]

Sex is purely sexual to women, they don’t need a man doll, just a fake c~~~.
They get off shoving just about anything up themselves.
Men need the simulation of human interaction, the bonding, the intimacy, hence the need for a human substitution.
As Blue Pill men we should have been able to join the dots about women’s real attitude towards “lovemaking” on this fact alone.
“Men are romantics pretending to be realists. Women are realists pretending to be romantics”

Not MGTOW though. We’ve become as pragmatic about women as they’ve always been about us. All we need is a simulation of their genitals. Equality!

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

When an affordable decent sex robot comes out, I’ll get one.

They can spend their money on dildos and cats, and can just f~~~ off about how I spend my money.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[SamsquanchParticipant 4226]

They would be “properly disinfected with special antibacterial soaps before and after use”. Sexy!

If only I could have done this to every girl before I banged her…

[Anonymous 3]

It doesn’t really matter what these women babble, what matters more is what the white knights do. There will come a time when men are fed up and start taking out the white knights, who can’t mind their own business.

Women themselves won’t really ever be the target, and quite frankly I don’t even have a problem with that. I personally would never give women a voice or authority or power, or even take a woman’s word at the same value as any man’s. I know better than that.

[AttonParticipant]

A technology driven by masturbatory fantasy is not a technology that enhances the lives of boringly unprogammable women.

The foundation of her entire argument god forbid something not exist for her benefit.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[ViciouscunningtreacherousParticipant 823]

And typical of a Marxist feminazi, she failed to point to out that it was the Spanish government at the pressure of c~~~ groups to close it. As I read it, the place was immensely popular.

For in much wisdom is much grief, and he who increases knowledge increases sorrow.

[Can’t Stump TrumpParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

I’m not sure the juice would be worth the squeeze.

Depends a lot on your lifestyle, I guess. No matter how expensive they are, I guarantee it’s less expensive than a real woman. But if you don’t feel a great need to f~~~, more power to you.

Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.

[Author]

Posts