Sex robot for blue pillers and feminist "men"!

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

I’m not joking

“Samantha, the famous sex robot from creator Dr. Sergi Santos, has been given a major upgrade. She is now able to refuse sex from her human partner if she’s not in the mood or is feeling disrespected.

The latest upgrades were demonstrated to a panel of “sexperts” at the Life Science Center in Newcastle, England.

The upgrade will allow Samantha to enter “dummy mode”, an unresponsive state, due to a variety of reasons including an overly aggressive partner. She can also enter this mode if she feels bored with her partner’s attentions.

Samantha is meant to be a realistic partner. She has motorized hands, hips, and a motorized face which can whisper endearments to her partner if properly stimulated. In addition to her “sex” mode, she also has modes for “family” and “romantic” as well as settings for an “extra naughty” level.”

http://www.syfy.com/syfywire/famous-sex-robot-can-now-refuse-sex-if-shes-not-in-the-mood

Apart from that, it seems to me a REALLY GOOD move: the owner can choose the mode, but the availability of a “entitled c~~~ withholding sex” mode is going to broke every effort by feminists. It would be even a good idea to set it as default mode: the owner can immediatly change the mode to “extra naughty” but being “entitled c~~~ withholding sex mode” the default then feminists are done. Game over.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Manspread MansplainerParticipant 4222]

Eric Lauder wrote:

She can also enter this mode if she feels bored with her partner’s attentions.

Does it f~~~ Chad while the “owner” is at work? I.e. Slut Mode.

Hopefully it will demand flowers and diamonds too.
If it can complain about the choice of entertainment that would be golden, especially if it’s several weeks later.

If women ran the world = It would become the shithole you are seeing.

[Space CowboyParticipant 1466]

This is a genius move to appease femtards. We should demand vibrators have the same modes.

"Have you ever thought about any real freedoms? Freedom from the opinions of others...even from the opinions of yourself?"

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22555]

Space Cowboy wrote:

This is a genius move to appease femtards. We should demand vibrators have the same modes.

They make male sex dolls and robots. Make sure this crap goes in the male versions too.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Space Cowboy wrote:

This is a genius move to appease femtards. We should demand vibrators have the same modes.

They could do much better, they could appease and destroy feminists at the same time, with a single move, by implementing an “affirmative consent mode” in the sex robot.

It should work so:
You return at home.
The sex robot begs you to f~~~ her: “would you consent to have sex with me, please? I’m terribly aroused, I need your dick in my ass, please give me your consent!”

LOL 😀

That’s why women cannot compete with men when there’s to ACTUALLY have sex, having sexual fantasies and making real those fantasies: women’s speciality is being the gatekeeper of sex, men’s speciality is being sex doers – all the restraints on sex come from women, even a s~~~ty thing like “affirmative ongoing consent” can be turned in a really sexy thing if it’s just only up to the man and women can’t put restraints on him.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Anonymous 12]

Who the f~~~ buys a device that refuses to do what it is designed for?

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22555]

Anonymous wrote:

Who the f~~~ buys a device that refuses to do what it is designed for?

Directv subscribers?

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[BigDParticipant 3024]

Anonymous wrote:

Who the f~~~ buys a device that refuses to do what it is designed for?

You know and I know that no means yes. Heck, it can mean whatever I want it to mean. It’s a damn robot.

Don't stick your dick into anyone you aren't willing to put up with for eighteen years and nine months.

[JB BooksParticipant 3182]

Well you could always listen to it bitch/whine for about 5 seconds once you get home, then slap it on the ass and immediately change the mode to extra naughty…

We just don't realize life's most significant events while they're happening. Back then, I thought, "Well, there'll be other days". I didn't realize that that was the only day. - "Moonlight" Graham

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

I don’t care about “no” and “yes”, there couldn’t be such thing in the only kind of sex robot that I would buy: a sex robot able to wake up me at the desidered hour by giving oral sex – that would be its main goal and its main use, in such case I’m sleeping when the sex robot begin the blowjob, so if there’s a problem for feminists then it must just only about MY consent, not about women, children and robots.

Note: NO woman in the whole world, nor even in the past, nor even in the future, would wake up her man EVERY morning at the desidered hour giving a blowjob.
So it’s not about replacing women, because it’s a thing that a woman won’t do.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[CarnageParticipant 22113]

The f~~~ I just read?

To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Anonymous wrote:

Who the f~~~ buys a device that refuses to do what it is designed for?

It’s like a videogame: you’ll have to find a way to convince the robot to give the pussy.
It’ll probably will easier and especially much quicker than with a real woman.
It’s like playing Total War: every turn takes few minutes but simulate 6 months, and it’s easier to conquer the whole Europe or even more compared to real life.

That’s why I said it’s for blue pillers, I don’t care about such things, I just want to be woke with oral sex every morning then ejaculating like a volcano.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Black MaskParticipant 1572]

What next? Robot rights?

"Man honesty is misogyny." - Patrice O'Neal

[SH3LLZParticipant 5569]

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

Morlock wrote:

Who the f~~~ buys a device that refuses to do what it is designed for?

Directv subscribers?

BOOM!! SECRET AGENT FTW!

Seriously thought.. This sounds like a s~~~e video game. Just put it on “easy mode” and tell the fem demons to f*ck off!

#ICETHEMOUT!!! #MANOUT!!! #HIDEYOURWEALTH #VAGINAISWORTHLESS

[Anonymous 42]

Eric Lauder wrote:

She is now able to refuse sex from her human partner if she’s not in the mood or is feeling disrespected

F~~~ THAT!

Go to work on that bitch, PRONTO!

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10920]

I agree that this is a genius move. Remember when feminists where complaining some months back about sex robots not being able to consent to sex? They tried to say that the sex robots were being “raped” by men?
Now that issue has been dealt with.
Game over for women AND feminists!

Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

[Anonymous 42]

Mr. Spock wrote:

I agree that this is a genius move. Remember when feminists where complaining some months back about sex robots not being able to consent to sex? They tried to say that the sex robots were being “raped” by men?
Now that issue has been dealt with.
Game over for women AND feminists!

I’ll tell you what’s next! Criminal ABUSE charges filed by the robot’s blue tooth technology! You won’t even know the SWAT team is COMING!

[Space CowboyParticipant 1466]

It’s like buying a race car (to race in) and non drivers wanting to ban the race cars because they “promote speeding irresponsibly”. The manufacturers, rather than fighting a ban on race cars, allow them all to be made on a speed limit only max setting which can be switched off.
They get made, people buy them and turn it to party mode.

"Have you ever thought about any real freedoms? Freedom from the opinions of others...even from the opinions of yourself?"

[Daryll55Participant 2958]

Anonymous wrote:

In addition to her “sex” mode, she also has modes for “family” and “romantic” as well as settings for an “extra naughty” level.”

Flip switch to “slut” mode and then break the switch. That’s all you need.

Marry again, Hell NO ! ( Even JESUS was hung on a cross just once)

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22574]

Anonymous wrote:

Who the f~~~ buys a device that refuses to do what it is designed for?

That is the question. SJWs design their “products” and “entertainment” not to work, nor appeal towards men, then the SJWs turn around and falsely accuse men of bigotry when men do not pay money for the SJW designed products.

[Author]

Posts