Sex and Psychology

Topic by Wolfgang Ryder

Wolfgang Ryder

Home Forums Relations~~~s Sex and Psychology

This topic contains 11 replies, has 10 voices, and was last updated by Wolfgang Ryder  Wolfgang Ryder 3 years, 8 months ago.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #243347
    Wolfgang Ryder
    Wolfgang Ryder
    Spectator
    70

    I’m in college and in my course I have a subject named “Psychology and Organizational Behavior”. Basically, it deals with the employee’s behavior towards his coworkers and his employer.

    My teacher (a woman that might be between her late 30s and early 40s), had spoken a lot about psychological theories and et cetera. But I noticed something that is inda hard to explain.

    It’s seems like today’s psychology worries more with getting you to relate with someone and spend your energy with them then making you find your inner self and be satisfied with it. I don’t know if it always have been like this since Freud or is just plain modern psychology.

    But anyway…

    I remember one class which my teacher said something about human needs. We all need a place to live, eat, drink, p~~~ and s~~~. When it comes to sex, my teacher said that it is also a basic human need. She spoke in a tone that it sounded mandatory. And then, she added that humans NEED to have sexual rrelationships. Otherwise, they’ll become emotionally (and mentally) unstable without it and if someone can live without sex (hard but not impossible) they should seek help because this dear citizen might have a problem.

    She sounded like she was basically saying that if you refuse to seek a bitch and try to convince her in an endless and hopeless journey to gain access to her pussy through credit cards, strolls in the mall, boring chit-chat and trying your best to have a nice impression so you can finally have a half assed sex ’cause you don’t have the patience to bear all this s~~~ flake ballet, then you’re possibly a nutf~~~.

    I wonder if my teacher believes in this “first time must be special” bulls~~~.

    After class, I wondered if monks and nuns can fit into this category since they basically renouce sex to dedicate themselves to a spiritual journey (possibly no since they’re doing this for religious purposes).

    I’m not against sex, but the fact is: Sex is way too overestimated.

    Something that you can afford with professional women while people bother trying to convince the prototype hoes to, at best, spent one night in their houses.

    Not mentioning that when you’re at the top of your life with a financial success you have to be careful with those who want to be pregnant on purpose.

    Something that you can just go and pay for it while they wanna bother trying to get a bitch to torment their lives ’till the end of their existence.

    Anyway, I wanna know what are your thoughts about this. Is sex the first priority in your life or do you think it is possible to someone not even bother with something like this?

    #243354
    +1
    Soldier-Medic
    Soldier-Medic
    Participant
    2566

    I have a bachelor’s in psychology myself. I was fortunate in that I had some excellent professors that would only put their own opinions out during lectures based upon several years of experience and observation.

    My opinion is that the moment a professional is trying to put forth a universal imperative, especially in psychology, that you are looking at them trying to project themselves upon everyone else. She may be using this as a tactic to ensure that whatever partners she has at the time is putting out. If a man made the same assertions about sex, in a classroom, it is likely that a female student would have complained to the dean.

    Just like the article written by a man proclaiming that he is a feminist and demonstrates it by not objecting to his wife f~~~ing around. What we actually have, in my opinion, is a man that has the fetish of being cuckolded. He enjoys it but is recycling his own sexual bias as normal/liberating/egalitarian/etc. When is actuality, he enjoys being cuckolded. Frequently, these types of men are bottoms as well, aka submissive.

    So, in a nutshell, your professor is full of s~~~.

    "I asked you a question. I didn't ask you to repeat what the voices in you head are telling you" ~ Me. ........Yes I'm still angry.

    #243360
    +1
    Narwhal
    narwhal
    Participant

    …place to live, eat, drink, p~~~ and s~~~.

    If you don’t have these things, you will eventually die. That isn’t psychology, that’s biology.

    I cannot see how you can put sex on the same level. For many people, their brains may be wired where they crave sex, but they can live without it. As well, in my uneducated opinion, a brain can be ‘trained’ to do without and not have issues.

    Ok. Then do it.

    #243366
    +1

    Anonymous
    42

    I have a bachelor’s in psychology myself. I was fortunate in that I had some excellent professors that would only put their own opinions out during lectures based upon several years of experience and observation.

    My opinion is that the moment a professional is trying to put forth a universal imperative, especially in psychology, that you are looking at them trying to project themselves upon everyone else. She may be using this as a tactic to ensure that whatever partners she has at the time is putting out. If a man made the same assertions about sex, in a classroom, it is likely that a female student would have complained to the dean.

    Just like the article written by a man proclaiming that he is a feminist and demonstrates it by not objecting to his wife f~~~ing around. What we actually have, in my opinion, is a man that has the fetish of being cuckolded. He enjoys it but is recycling his own sexual bias as normal/liberating/egalitarian/etc. When is actuality, he enjoys being cuckolded. Frequently, these types of men are bottoms as well, aka submissive.

    So, in a nutshell, your professor is full of s~~~.

    Bravo Soldier mental f~~~ing Medic! You can tear it down but some s~~~ ya just can’t fix! Stupid being one of them! Narcissism being another!

    My psychological assessment of that situation? (MG-Tower PHD; Gynocentrology) They’re feeding each other mental illness, for him it’s the slapdown of cuckolded, for her it’s uplift to a higher level of narcissism.

    #243367
    +2
    DDJ
    DDJ
    Participant
    1880

    While sex is a biological imperative, I have never believed it to be something that should control a man’s direction. It should never be a man’s main goal.

    That said, it’s interesting because back in 1993, I was a divorced single parent with custody of my children. I went back to college and as part of my degree path, I took a course in Sociology. One day I missed class and didn’t get the reading assignment. I reached out to one of my fellow students for the assignment, and they told me to read a particular chapter for the following day’s discussion. I read the chapter and went to class.

    During the lecture, the teacher (female) started spouting the chapter out of context to use it to man bash. I gave her about 10 minutes and interrupted. I advised her that this wasn’t the message at all and that she was taking the chapter grossly out of proportion. She became infuriated with me and demanded I support my statement…which I did.

    After I finished, she became more angry because I cited from passages of the textbook, that she didn’t assign the class to read. Turns out her reading assignment was only part of the chapter…not the whole thing. She only wanted the students to read the parts that supported her man-bashing…censoring the others out. So when I called her out on this, other students started speaking out against her. She ended class early.

    F~~~ indoctrination…teach knowledge or don’t teach at all.

    Every woman is a slut, if you catch her on the right day.

    #243368

    Anonymous
    54

    And your paying for this?

    #243403
    Ned Trent
    Ned Trent
    Participant
    4894

    She spoke in a tone that it sounded mandatory. And then, she added that humans NEED to have sexual rrelationships. Otherwise, they’ll become emotionally (and mentally) unstable without it and if someone can live without sex (hard but not impossible) they should seek help because this dear citizen might have a problem.

    So what is supposed to be the news there..? Just saying …

    … ahhh teachers, god and the brave new world love ’em.

    I'd rather die a natual death with a clear MGTOW conscience somewhere off the grid than one within "modern" civilisation with a big stress mark on my forehead and a couple of dozen tubes plugged into my body. Back to the plantation..? Me..? Hey, literally: I won't ever fucking kid myself...YZERLMNTSIC

    #243454
    +1
    Badger
    Badger
    Participant
    2277

    She spoke in a tone that it sounded mandatory. And then, she added that humans NEED to have sexual relationships. Otherwise, they’ll become emotionally (and mentally) unstable without it and if someone can live without sex (hard but not impossible) they should seek help because this dear citizen might have a problem.

    Also have an undergrad degree in Psychology. Since sexual relationships were probably not always available at that time or easy to initiate, and she was concerned about everyone’s mental health without them, she should have been asked if free brothels might be a good idea, with both men and women having to serve in them for a specified length of time. Her prescription for a happy and sane population.

    #243482
    Beer
    Beer
    Participant
    11832

    Is sex the first priority in your life or do you think it is possible to someone not even bother with something like this?

    No. I like sex…if I had a lifelike sex robot I’d be busting a nut in it like 8 times a day, but sex with a woman comes with a lot of drama and risks. I don’t see how sex makes me a happier/healthier person when some of the least happy times in my life have been times I’ve been involved with a woman, and other than getting into meth and heroin, sex is probably the only other behavior with the capacity to destroy all my other future plans and derail me from achieving other goals.

    #243500

    Anonymous
    1

    While sex is a biological imperative, I have never believed it to be something that should control a man’s direction. It should never be a man’s main goal.

    That said, it’s interesting because back in 1993, I was a divorced single parent with custody of my children. I went back to college and as part of my degree path, I took a course in Sociology. One day I missed class and didn’t get the reading assignment. I reached out to one of my fellow students for the assignment, and they told me to read a particular chapter for the following day’s discussion. I read the chapter and went to class.

    During the lecture, the teacher (female) started spouting the chapter out of context to use it to man bash. I gave her about 10 minutes and interrupted. I advised her that this wasn’t the message at all and that she was taking the chapter grossly out of proportion. She became infuriated with me and demanded I support my statement…which I did.

    After I finished, she became more angry because I cited from passages of the textbook, that she didn’t assign the class to read. Turns out her reading assignment was only part of the chapter…not the whole thing. She only wanted the students to read the parts that supported her man-bashing…censoring the others out. So when I called her out on this, other students started speaking out against her. She ended class early.

    F~~~ indoctrination…teach knowledge or don’t teach at all.

    The student becomes the master. You shot that s~~~ down, right quick.

    A pleasure to read.

    You don’t strike me as a drinker but have a fermented vegetable drink on me.

    #243525
    Wolfgang Ryder
    Wolfgang Ryder
    Spectator
    70

    And your paying for this?

    Yes.

    #243528
    Wolfgang Ryder
    Wolfgang Ryder
    Spectator
    70

    During the lecture, the teacher (female) started spouting the chapter out of context to use it to man bash. I gave her about 10 minutes and interrupted. I advised her that this wasn’t the message at all and that she was taking the chapter grossly out of proportion. She became infuriated with me and demanded I support my statement…which I did.

    After I finished, she became more angry because I cited from passages of the textbook, that she didn’t assign the class to read. Turns out her reading assignment was only part of the chapter…not the whole thing. She only wanted the students to read the parts that supported her man-bashing…censoring the others out. So when I called her out on this, other students started speaking out against her. She ended class early.

    F~~~ indoctrination…teach knowledge or don’t teach at all.

    Had I done this I would have caused a general s~~~ fit.

    But it would be interesting…

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.