Scary S~~~ ( UK )

[sjt1975Participant 2536]

Yet another reason to not live with or to not have a relationship with a woman. How much more obvious does the anti-male agenda have to be?

So, if a guy tries to protect himself and/or the marriage/woman, by not giving her access to [his] money, even if she would have spent [his] money un-reasonably, he is ‘economically abusing’ the woman, so he is committing ‘domestic abuse’ against her, for which he can be electronically tagged? If that is the correct interpretation, then that is nothing short of retarded. It surely only goes to prove that the woman is only interested in money/resources! A guy who is electronically tagged for this reason is not even allowed to have a drink of alcohol at all!!! I cannot believe that this s~~~ will get passed in to law! What retarded person is making-up this legislation? And who in Parliament is going to be stupid enough to pass it in to the statute books? OMFG. I need to be retired, like yesterday…

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

Tony wrote:

If “accused” ( it mainly be blokes ) you can be fitted with an electronic tag, not allowed to drink or use drugs while tagged.

This bulls~~~ already happens on probation or parole. The difference is the technology is far more advanced these days so they can literally test if you are drinking with the tags (same test the cop pigs use).

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[Author]

Posts