Say what you want about women…

[AlmostNiceGuyParticipant 210]

While I despise the gender in it’s entirety, Today I reflected on just how malevolent and skilled their ways are. Regardless of my feelings, I tried to look at what they have done and influenced society, and came to a crossroads. On one hand, there are idiot, biologically-driven women, who have absolutely no clue what they are doing but get by through emotion and instinct. Then there are the ones who KNOW what they need to do, and use their advantage to succeed. Let me give an example.  Two women are dating two different guys, both get pregnant, however one immediately leaves the man with the child and go f~~~s a different man. This is what I now refer to AB (Animalisticus Bitchus). However the other woman has the child, remains in the relationship for 10 years, continuously mind-f~~~s the man, and when the ten years are up, she takes the child, as well as the alimony and child-support. This is the NB (Nova Bitchus). Nova because they have adapted to the system, so they can strike with complete safety and impunity. Of course the latter is the one you need to worry about, since AB can easily be distracted with an Iphone and some Starbucks, NB go for the kill. Every.Damn.Time. While thinking about this was fun and entertained me during one of mangina teacher’s lectures, when delving deeper into it, I started to concoct a really paranoid train of thought. AB as everywhere, in fact they are a dime-a-dozen, but NBs, they are very rare. 1/15 women I’d say. They are the type that CONVINCE YOU, not tell you, that they are different, and that they care, all while sharpening a knife when you turn around. Let me know what you think, and to quote a game to explain this train of thought. “Nothing is true, everything is permitted”.

[experiencedParticipant]

Almost Nice Guy, thank you for hitting both nails on the head.  Without this knowledge and insight, too many young men are being led to the slaughter by short and long routes.     Donald Rumsfeld said, “…as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns — the ones we don’t know we don’t know. And if one looks throughout the history of our country and other free countries, it is the latter category that tend to be the difficult ones. The absence of evidence is not evidence of absense, or vice versa. [Repeated almost verbatim four months later in Brussels at a NATO conference.]

Sandlitter aka Sandman in his monks video, via a haughty spirit, has defined his ignoring of unknown unknowns.  For those of us who happen to have been there, “he has no idea” whatsoever. Bad for him, but the true crime is that he will spread this viruslike absence of thought to many unsuspecting young men paralleled here:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/13/us-usa-cattle-jbs-drugs-idUSBRE97C02M20130813         Or here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_aL94_10YE       the guy applying the instrument is Sandman applying “HIS” daily dose of red pills, on the unsuspecting.

 

 

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[Author]

Posts