Revenge of the Divorcee, the Roy Moore edition (Roy Moore was the Judge.)

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22558]

Revenge of the Divorcee, the Roy Moore edition (Roy Moore was the Judge in the case.)

Since last week, when the smear campaign against Roy Moore began, the accusations keep falling apart as quickly as the accusations were made.

This press conference by Roy Moore’s lawyer today at 5:00 PM EST focused on the forgery in the yearbook presented the fifth accuser.

But, it is come out where the “D.A.” of the forgery came from. While Roy Moore was a Judge on the bench, the “D.A.” came from how Judge Moore’s assistant signed the court documents for Judge Moore.

It seems that the five accuser, the one with the lawyer and yearbook, has a connection to Roy Moore. In 1999, while Roy Moore was a judge, the accuser, whom was a divorcee, was denied a motion in court, in her divorce, by then Judge Moore: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/11/breaking-accuser-lied-no-contact-roy-moore-alleged-sexual-assault-judge-moore-dismissed-divorce-action/

This is looking more and more like a revenge plot by the fifth “accuser” over then Judge Moore not siding with the accuser in her divorce.

For those doing the smear campaign against Roy Moore, with a clearly forged signature and a motive for lying against Roy Moore, it is looking very bad for them from a political standpoint.

It is a month before the special Senate election between Roy Moore and Doug Jones. From the looks of things, Roy Moore will be winning in a land slide.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Faust For Science wrote:

Roy Moore will be winning in a land slide.

I hope and pray to God that he wins. If for no other reason than to apply lots of egg to lots senate faces.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22558]

PistolPete wrote:

Faust For Science wrote:

Roy Moore will be winning in a land slide.

I hope and pray to God that he wins. If for no other reason than to apply lots of egg to lots senate faces.

It gets better. By the establishment in the U.S. Senate doing this, they have walked themselves into a major sex scandal directly dealing with Congress and the Senate, with it coming out the taxpayer money being used to settle sex scandals dealing with Congress and Senate members: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/11/shock-15-million-taxpayer-money-paid-settle-congressional-sexual-harassment-lawsuits-video/

There are already calls for a list to be revealed of whom the people were involved in these settlements.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

As usual the plots and schemes of the left blow up in their faces…and backfire.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22558]

PistolPete wrote:

As usual the plots and schemes of the left blow up in their faces…and backfire.

The establishment just doubled down again, they came a six accuser was groped by him in his office: https://www.axios.com/sixth-moore-accuser-he-didnt-pinch-it-he-grabbed-it-2509821813.html

But, read between the lines. The claim was in 1991 while Roy Moore was an lawyers at law firm. She stated she was there on business. I wonder if she was in a legal fight with Roy Moore that she lost.

Right now, Roy Moore’s team is probably combing through Roy Moore’s documents for the case that dealt with her.

[Anonymous 6]

Narrative is falling before their eyes. I’m telling you, this has McConnell’s name all over this. Look at how sloppy it is. This is not how you do a smear campaign. Moore is gonna sue the ever living s~~~ out of the Washington Post and everybody else he can find, and then walk into Congress as the new Senator.

Now what is the swamp gonna do to get Kelli Ward & Marsha Blackburn out. You know they are MAGA people, so you gotta figure they are next.

And speaking of Congress, they just passed a bill talking about mandatory sexual harassment training. There is a big list that i saw earlier of about 20 congressmen voluntarily electing NOT to run for re-election. I wonder how many of those names will appear in a sexual harassment case?

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22558]

Anonymous wrote:

Look at how sloppy it is. This is not how you do a smear campaign.

I agree. Even if you hate what someone does, you can respect the work that went into their efforts.

This… This amateur hour. The forged signature with two different pen colors. That is the tip of the iceberg. There are so many mistakes in this smear job.

These people did not do a background check on the accusers, nor look at their evidence beforehand, nor even do some basic math on the dates and places of these accusations.

If one is going to slander someone else, at least have enough self-respect to do a thorough job and not make so many obvious mistakes that only idiots will believe you.

Anonymous wrote:

Now what is the swamp gonna do to get Kelli Ward & Marsha Blackburn out. You know they are MAGA people, so you gotta figure they are next.

That is very likely.

Anonymous wrote:

And speaking of Congress, they just passed a bill talking about mandatory sexual harassment training. There is a big list that i saw earlier of about 20 congressmen voluntarily electing NOT to run for re-election. I wonder how many of those names will appear in a sexual harassment case?

Rats jumping ship. I am not sure why. I do not believe it is only due to the nationalist movement. They likely caught wind of something bad coming and they want out of town as soon as possible.

[JuehueParticipant 1316]

PistolPete wrote:

Faust For Science wrote:

Roy Moore will be winning in a land slide.

I hope and pray to God that he wins. If for no other reason than to apply lots of egg to lots senate faces.

Meanwhile Ben Shapiro already convinced that Moore is guilty and calling people to write in Jeff Session.

[Anonymous 6]

Juehue wrote:

PistolPete wrote:

Faust For Science wrote:

Roy Moore will be winning in a land slide.

I hope and pray to God that he wins. If for no other reason than to apply lots of egg to lots senate faces.

Meanwhile Ben Shapiro already convinced that Moore is guilty and calling people to write in Jeff Session.

Ben Shapiro is no better than Ann Coulter, Dana Loesch, or any Never Trumpers. He says he’s this great mind for conservatism, but he’s absolutely clueless. Has no grasp of what Trump is or the phenomenon behind him. Hell if you just pick the opposite argument of the media, you’ll be right about most things. He’s not even smart enough to do that. I’ve never heard a theory from him that ever panned out.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22558]

Anonymous wrote:

Juehue wrote:

PistolPete wrote:

Faust For Science wrote:

Roy Moore will be winning in a land slide.

I hope and pray to God that he wins. If for no other reason than to apply lots of egg to lots senate faces.

Meanwhile Ben Shapiro already convinced that Moore is guilty and calling people to write in Jeff Session.

Ben Shapiro is no better than Ann Coulter, Dana Loesch, or any Never Trumpers. He says he’s this great mind for conservatism, but he’s absolutely clueless. Has no grasp of what Trump is or the phenomenon behind him. Hell if you just pick the opposite argument of the media, you’ll be right about most things. He’s not even smart enough to do that. I’ve never heard a theory from him that ever panned out.

I have come to the belief that this is a time of truth, where the public learns where everyone truly stands.

[SandalsParticipant 4254]

PistolPete wrote:

As usual the plots and schemes of the left blow up in their faces…and backfire.

And as usual, no one goes to jail, no one gets fired, and everyone gets away with everything, and the innocent are left carrying the cost of the evildoers.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22558]

Here is information on the latest accuser: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/11/latest-roy-moore-accuser-said-grabbed-ass-arrested-writing-bad-checks-3rd-degree-theft/

The accusation when public three hours ago, and someone are already has done a background check which pokes holes in her credibility. This might be a record.

[SandalsParticipant 4254]

Faust For Science wrote:

The accusation when public three hours ago, and someone are already has done a background check which pokes holes in her credibility. This might be a record.

And unless and until these false accusers go to jail and pay the price, Conservatives are always going to trail behind in a defensive position while the attackers just walk away after assigning the conservatives a s~~~-ton of work to prove themselves innocent.

Seems conservatives just never learn. Someone has to pay for these smear campaigns.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22558]

Sandals wrote:

Faust For Science wrote:

The accusation when public three hours ago, and someone are already has done a background check which pokes holes in her credibility. This might be a record.

And unless and until these false accusers go to jail and pay the price, Conservatives are always going to trail behind in a defensive position while the attackers just walk away after assigning the conservatives a s~~~-ton of work to prove themselves innocent.

Seems conservatives just never learn. Someone has to pay for these smear campaigns.

Sandals, you are working from the point of view that the rinos are playing defensive on this. Rumor has it that the rinos are playing offense on this matter and the rinos are partly behind these smears.

The establishment is a one party system pretending to be two parties. The establishment does not want someone like Roy Moore, whom is not one of them to get elected to the Senate.

[NomadicExpatParticipant 1785]

Alright, lurking MRA’s…. Get to f~~~ing work.

False accusers need HARD TIME behind bars. Not a fine, not some bulls~~~ psych training… they need to be Locked the F~~~ Up. Their faces need to be plastered on every tabloid, with every detail about how these swine tried to ruin a Man’s life so they could get “attention”.

F~~~in’ Get ‘Em, MRAs!!!!

Or is that not what MRAs do? Because they don’t seem to do anything else.

[Darth CovfefeParticipant 62]

roy moore is just roasties trying to keep rich older men from porking hot young tail. they would literally criminalize sexual relations based on age difference if they could get away with it.

The only reason women have so much privilege is because 20 million years ago they forgot how to lay eggs.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22558]

It has been a while since I broke down a psy-op troll post.

Darth Covfefe wrote:

roy moore is just roasties trying to keep rich older men from porking hot young tail.

I have only seen the term “roasties” used in one place on the internet. And those members know better than to use that term elsewhere because it immediately flags them.

I do not think you are such a member, but you are trying to deflect whom you really are.

By the way, the members of this forum prefer to use the term “c~~~”.

Also, you are attempting to passive-aggressively steer conversation. You ignore the clearly falsified evidence and instead you post a statement that the syntax of agrees with the false accusations and any disagreement appears to be in agreement of the accusations.

That is a tactic that women use a lot.

Darth Covfefe wrote:

they would literally criminalize sexual relations based on age difference if they could get away with it.

This is another example of how you push a narrative through the syntax of your statement. You post a statement that creates a situation where a disagreement appears to be against age of consent laws.

All theses statements to steer the conversation in a direction where you would then accuse those defending Roy Moore from the false accusations against him to be in support of pedophilia.

Instead, from the way you carefully worded you statement, I believe you are a tuna agitator trying to set up this forum to be falsely accused of supporting pedophilia.

I will leave with this quote by Mark Twain, “You got the words right, Livy, but you don’t know the tune.”

[SandalsParticipant 4254]

Faust For Science wrote:

Sandals, you are working from the point of view that the rinos are playing defensive on this. Rumor has it that the rinos are playing offense on this matter and the rinos are partly behind these smears.

The establishment is a one party system pretending to be two parties. The establishment does not want someone like Roy Moore, whom is not one of them to get elected to the Senate.

Thanks professor. I said Conservatives, not rinos.

Get another 15 years under your belt and travel to a few more countries, and then you can talk about my point of view. In the meantime, just ask, don’t assume.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22558]

Sandals wrote:

Thanks professor. I said Conservatives, not rinos.

Then you are confused. Within the Republican party there are almost no conservatives left. There are either rinos whom want the gravy train to continue at the expense of the American people, and there are those whom were once Tea Party conservatives have become ‘workers revolution’ style communists in everything but name.

This is why the intellectuals hate the Trump supporters. The Trump supporters are the classic definition of communists (classic Marx communists, not the atheist intellectual Stalinists), while the intellectuals pretend to be communists.

President Trump is a capitalist on economic issues with centrist views on social issues and a nationalist point of view. President Trump’s supporters are loyal to him because he is mostly honest, he is doing his best to keep his campaign promises, and he drives his political enemies insane.

[Author]

Posts