Students Told to Take Photos With a ‘Consent Contract’ Before They Have Sex

[Anonymous 12]

Can’t see how it would work given that the woman can consent and yet still claim rape in the following days or years.

[Anonymous 5]

My contract is my c~~~ up in their anus!

[MusclecarGolferParticipant 636]

Here’s a clip from the 1987 sci-fi post-apocalyptic thriller “Cherry 2000”. This is the scene where the star and his buddies go the local bar for some tail; where all “encounters” are contractually-finalized. Seems like this may not be that far away…

[Anonymous 54]

So your f~~~ing, with your lawyer and your bail bondsman in the room with you. Vidio tapeing it for evedenve.

This s~~~s getting to be a f~~~ing joke.

[Silver FoxParticipant 2766]

Anonymous wrote:

Can’t see how it would work given that the woman can consent and yet still claim rape in the following days or years.

^This.

She can claim she was drunk, or coerced, into signing the stupid document. Or she can claim specific things happened that weren’t consensual. Or she can say that the guy “stealthed” her. Or any number of other things that would render the consent document worthless.

The signed piece of paper has less value than toilet paper, and it won’t save you in court.

"Are you loosed from a wife? Do not seek a wife." --Apostle Paul

[Manspread MansplainerParticipant 4222]

Anonymous wrote:

Who can trust a still photo when there’s BODYCAM with video and audio to record her passionate profanity(f~~~ me harder) gasps, moans, and screams (ahhhh, ohhh, ohhhgod, more, more, harder, harder)!

Smile! You’re on candid camera!

Anonymous wrote:

So your f~~~ing, with your lawyer and your bail bondsman in the room with you. Vidio tapeing it for evedenve.

Ah, young love.
Romance is in the air.
..And big brother is sitting on the can.
Watching.

If women ran the world = It would become the shithole you are seeing.

[Anonymous 6]

Understand that there are a few things going on here. Number one is that since the turn of the 20th century the Postmodern movement has said that nothing has inherent value and that we pour in our own meanings into everything. History, tradition, and facts are of no real substance in this context. So we’re able to change that meaning by our own agency, either singularly or corporately. That’s how we got to the transgender movement. That’s also how we got to this insane consent BS. A yes yesterday was simply a yes yesterday. Today’s understanding of that event is new and can either match what the understanding was yesterday or be completely different. Do you see how that works? I hope that you do. Combine what I’ve just described with the fact that women are considered victims and are given a status of first among equals and you have a world were reality limited to the eye of the FEMALE beholder. Once one knows the logic behind these things then it makes some sense.

[Anonymous 13]

Gentleman, it’s not only ridiculous,

BUT,

It’s yet another trap.

“Now, in case you think taking a photo with a contract before having sex would be going a bit far with the whole make-sure-you-have-proof-of-affirmative-consent thing – you’re wrong.

In fact, it’s not going far enough. After all, affirmative consent policies demand that consent be given repeatedly throughout the entire encounter and that both parties be sober enough to do so.

So, just because someone consented when they signed the contract doesn’t necessarily mean that they were consenting the entire time. And, as Ashe Schow points out in the Examiner, a student could always claim she was too drunk to know what she was doing when she signed it.”

In other words YOU are still going to get DESTROYED for RAPE if she decides.

.

WALK THE F~~~ AWAY FROM THE WHOLE S~~~ SHOW UNTIL TIME ENDS.

[sjt1975Participant 2536]

… or just do yourself a favour and keep your dick in your pants! Give these attention-seeking gold-digging whores no excuse to cry ‘rape’ and/or to cash-in.

It’s only a matter of time until ALL men walk away from women, because sex will just not be worth the risk.

[Anonymous 0]

“The kit also also includes breath mints and a condom.”

I wonder who the suppliers of it are? Tic-tac and durex? Trojan maybe?
I won’t be surprised if this so called “contract” would be advertised by those companies in order to make another buck out of it… And of course, if it would be developed further by state, there would be government contracts and kickbacks for them. Otherwise I’m sure those corporativists won’t pay any single second of their corrupted attention towards that subject.

To be honest, I do not think that any of state persons are really dedicated to provide any single protection measure, that somehow may protect men (and, oh holy cow, maybe EVEN benefited them!). That’s against their interests. Maybe I’m wrong, but I think it’s very accurate in Russian realities.

Also I would add that tide of false accusations has reached Russia too and had been spreaded widely across country. And consequences are dreadful… If you’re interested, I would recommend to look up, for example, for Diana Shurygina’s case (Диана Шурыгина in Russian). Her name became a meme and synonym of vile whore! And whole case – a script for Kafka’s masterpiece.

[Knights Templar RisingParticipant 5106]

Another article that makes me pray for the meteor strike. #IceThemOut

Sovereignty above all else.

[sjt1975Participant 2536]

Once men can no longer verbally trust women, having sex is a recipe for disaster; no written ‘contract’ will stop a woman from legally taking advantage of a man, since it only takes a clever lawyer, an un-fair judicial system, or an un-fair judge; all three exist nowadays, in favour of women, irrespective of (the lack of) evidence and consent.

Men just need to walk away from women en-masse, then women may begin to realise the damage that they have done to the relationship between the sexes.

[Author]

Posts