Home › Forums › Relations~~~s › R. KELLY……am I missing something?
Tagged: media
This topic contains 7 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by Ranger One 2 years, 3 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
I follow politics and one of my favorite political contributors writes for The Rolling Stone magazine. I haven’t read his stuff in a while due to a demanding series of personal and professional obligations, but I finally found a couple of minutes for policy reading and decided to try and catch up on his perspective.
After going to the sight, I was staring at a picture of some young woman (obviously a victim) who claims to have escaped an abusive relationship with the notorious R&B crooner, R. Kelly. Without even reading one word of the article, I blasted into an all out, rolling on the floor, insanely “Joker-style” laugh-fest. I literally found the title and her picture of bravery utterly hilarious.
Before judging too harshly, I wanted to ensure she wasn’t a true victim of abuse (say a teenager in the late 90’s that had no clue of who the singer was). NOPE! She dated him in the early 2011’s….AFTER the infamous trials, AFTER the Chappelle Show skits. She dated this dude KNOWING full well his background…..and now expected sympathy from me. LMFAO. She wanted the bad-boy….she got him.
Rhetorical question…..AM I MISSING SOMETHING…..? Obvious answer…..NO!
Articles like that are hilariously gynocentric.No f~~~s given. F~~~ both of them. I’m ready for nuclear war.
Anonymous6R. Kelly has done some questionable things, but here’s the thing with him, his music is so good, nobody seems to give a f~~~. The more wrong he does, the more music he puts out, the less of a f~~~ people give
I bet you Sky-O is humming “I Believe I Can Fly” right now.
Anyway communication, real open communication, is not wanted or even required in a relationship. Women cannot handle fully open and honest communication, plus most perceive it as a weakness on the part of a man. All that is required is catering to her whims, and even then nothing is certain. There is no way to be sure of having a successful relationshit with a woman. MGTaoist
Anonymous14Rolling Stone is hardcore Leftist SJW PC propaganda, no you are not missing anything, the magazine is a joke. With that said I gave you a +1 for having noticed it.
Isn’t Rolling Stone magazine going bankrupt anyway? I believe I read that the other day.
Anyway communication, real open communication, is not wanted or even required in a relationship. Women cannot handle fully open and honest communication, plus most perceive it as a weakness on the part of a man. All that is required is catering to her whims, and even then nothing is certain. There is no way to be sure of having a successful relationshit with a woman. MGTaoist
Anonymous6Isn’t Rolling Stone magazine going bankrupt anyway? I believe I read that the other day.
Yea they are up for sale.
Isn’t Rolling Stone magazine going bankrupt anyway? I believe I read that the other day.
Yea they are up for sale.
I’d like to buy it for $1 and then disband it.
All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678