Home › Forums › Political Corner › Prostitution and Patriarchy
This topic contains 9 replies, has 10 voices, and was last updated by Rhapsodysparadox 4 years, 4 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Recently, Amnesty International advocated decriminalizing prostitution — without going so far as making it legal. This would have many benefits for the hookers and their johns, but it will be opposed for two reasons: Women do not want the competition. Politicians and lawyers and organized crime will be denied a source of income.
With that intro, here is …
Prostitution and Patriarchy – Sargon of Akkad
Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?
Anonymous1Women’s decisions are oppressing women from them doing their own decision…
Wrap you head around that!
Every society has had a troublesome relationship with prostitution,maybe there is a simple explanation.Blue pillars hate it because they see freerer men getting sex with lower risks and costs.Women hate it because it gives men options.Society tolerates it because there is no stopping it.It could be argued that all trades for sex between men and women are a form of prostitution.Also it is too honest for many.Multitudes of species see the male bring some Gift to the female for favour,this is especially true if the male does not take any part after copulation.Every woman who stays with an unloved man,for material comfort is indulging,as is every woman who is seeking a man with resources/wealth.In fact the woman who sells only sexual favour (ie pussy)rather than her womb/soul/life is in my view less morally compromised.For example,if you met a hot female stranger in a pub who gave you a freebie blowjob most people would not have an issue,but if she charged then most are shocked,can anyone say that either is right or wrong.Perhaps we are all hookers and johns just not aware of it or use language to disguise it.Just saying is all:-)
An example of female mental acrobatics and societys pussy pass to the ladies is the phenomena of Sugar Daddies and Sugar Babys,you see here women selling pussy but they made it palatable to the herd simply by changing the words.Hookers/johns anyone
Women are all about being anti-competitive, they don’t care how unethical it is because they are amoral. They claim this behavior is to “protect” these women, but it’s just to prevent men from going anywhere else. This behavior is also seen when it comes to them having to deal with competition from younger women.
God bless the ‘real’ whores. Stayin’ true to tha game.
it has been decriminalized in Canada. Some police forces (London, Ontario for one) have decided to take matters into their own hands and post pictures of Johns on a web site to shame them. So, they are still using public resources to find Johns, despite them not doing anything illegal, to give them a punishment without trial. This was a couple years ago so hopefully they have stopped this nonsense but I doubt it.
I bathe in the tears of single moms.
IIRC
here in Canada, you can sell pussy, but its still illegal to buy/rent it outright. You have to go through the polite way of paying for a hooker.
There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it
What happened to “My body, my choice”? Did that go out the window here?
Insofar as prostitution goes, my opinion is “No victim, no crime”. If guys wanna pay for it, let ’em.
Prostitution for consenting adults makes sense to me. Men want sex and women want money, so…what’s the problem? Prostitutes solve the problem of a man’s desire to get laid without having a committed relationship or spending time and money to “get to know” the woman they’re dating so she can feel comfortable enough to allow him to seduce her. Here’s how I think it should be regulated: personally, I don’t like to see streetwalkers because I don’t want kids exposed to that. I’d make a special districts that allow houses of prostitution (just like they do in Nevada). A guy walks in, does his business, and goes home. The church-going folks & kids walking home from school don’t have to be bothered with it because it’s out of sight. Each cat house should have a bouncer to get rid of guys who are violent and ruin s~~~ for everybody else. The more the merrier—because the prices go down with all that competition.
By the way, I challenge any woman to use the 77 cents on the dollar argument when it comes to male vs. female prostitutes.
"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)
The whole argument of that talk show guest is, if you read between the lines: “I’m too ugly to compete with legal prostitution; I’m just going to belly ache, and blindly regurgitate whatever stupidity I need to vilify it”. Who cares if it’s IMPOSSIBLE to get rid of, and the more difficulty involved with prostitutes plying their trade, the more dangerous the job ends up becoming.
If brothels were legal you could provide workplace security for the prostitutes, screen for STD’s, provide medical benefits, even sick days. But no no no!! Women would have to start treating men well if that happened! That would be incomprehensible!!!!
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678