Programming Driveless Cars

[TonyParticipant 152]

Just read this one today in the papers about – Tesla

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2018/10/25/self-driving-cars-should-save-young-elderly-poll-finds/

Told it was illegal to program the cars to favour avoiding children first THEN women ( For how long !!! )

The poll shows the results in avoiding preference

1st – Youngsters
2nd – Girl
3rd – Boy

2nd to last – Criminal
Last was a Dog

Couldn’t see where Land Whales were – “Thought they would be 1st to avoid, hit one of them – Kill Car”

[CuckSniperParticipant 449]

I hate bulls~~~ like this.

Society telling us “it’s okay to kill men but not females”. Programming cars to avoid hitting athletes/doctors but the homeless man is fair game.

The libcucks push for “equality” but then continue to do s~~~ like this.

How about giving the owner of the car the power to choose that decision?

Because If I was given that power, I would tell my car to save men first.

But if the owner of the car was given this power and my car hit a female, I bet I would be charged with murder some how!

And how will these cars be able to tell the difference between men and females if they identify as something else? lololololol.

I would hate it if my car killed a man because he decided to cross dress as a female for Halloween LOL

[Branched offParticipant 11006]

This sort of thing is very revealing about social attitudes in the gynocentric world.

Evidently Latin Americans and Francophones are big white knights -well good luck with that one lads.

Since women have less road sense than men they are more likely to be the cause of accidents (yes men have higher speed accidents but rather fewer). If a gender bias was given to the cars, then you would see innocent men being killed to avoid women who drove into one of these things.

A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own

[Gravel PitParticipant]

just the tip of the iceberg in the endless ethics debates surrounding AI.

Get ready for decades of fierce debate and for body-counts, due to AI, to rise. It’s not even real AI. Real AI is centuries away…. the Jones are trying to keep up with the Jetsons and people die.

Tesla is really neat, I admit. I drove a Model X 300 miles. BUT. Lithium Ion is a joke. It’s expensive and hurts the environment more than gas. The power pack on Tesla car will need replacement well before that 10 year warranty is over LOL. And the initial cost is $120K ? LOL Teslagini much? A complete waste of money on a toy… Tesla is NOT the future. And I dont even need to mention big oil….

Stick to gas and stick to keeping your hands on the wheel. EVs wont take over the scene until close to 2100…

[Maraudrz1Participant 2250]

I think children and small pets would do less damage to your vehicle. Landwhales, however, would be catastrophic.

Women's brains and vagina have one thing in common. There is nothing in there until a man puts something in there.

[sidecarParticipant 35856]

Gravel Pit wrote:

just the tip of the iceberg in the endless ethics debates surrounding AI.

Naw. The “ethics” are irrelevant.

What matters is who gets sued when a self driving car kills someone. The owner / passenger? The programmer? The company that made the car? Who has the deepest pockets?

That’s not about ethics, it’s about money, and we there will have to be a few bad laws put in place to illegitimately protect car makers from the consequences of their creations before these things will ever actually be economically viable to make. It’s the same reason we will never be able to buy those flying cars they’ve been promising us for a century.

[Author]

Posts