"Poverty is Sexiest"

[MorpheusParticipant 14]

Apparently, Poverty is sexiest according to Beyonce and Lady Gaga.

http://news.yahoo.com/beyonce-gaga-join-call-tackle-female-poverty-145731689.html

This is a new one.

[MorpheusParticipant 14]

I mean’t sexist*. My mistakes

[HimeoParticipant 471]

Poverty is for men. you see. Because women are humans. Men are sub humans so poverty cannot effect them. Suffering is appropriate for sub humans, you see.

But it’s not right for a human to suffer poverty.

[MorpheusParticipant 14]

Yeah but they completely ignore the fact that men are not supported by government or anyone   and are to left by themselves as society ignores them. But people decides to focus on female poverty instead of poverty of both sexes and race.

[HimeoParticipant 471]

Morpheus wrote:

Yeah but they completely ignore the fact that men are not supported by government or anyone and are to left by themselves as society ignores them. But people decides to focus on female poverty instead of poverty of both sexes and race.

You’re looking at this like a man. You need to translate their words from Womanese to normal language.

Gynocentrism is the key. Women see the world in a caste system. Women are people because they have the correct biology. Men are sub-human filth and unworthy of consideration much like you and I do not normally consider the welfare of the human immunodeficiency virus.

Men can raise their caste by gaining wealth, power, status, personality, and health (youth + beauty).

Women raise their caste by marrying super humans or lose status by association with sub-human filth.

To beyonce and other (super humans), they have the compassion to look down on poor normal humans and demand their health and well-being be supported by ocean of sub human filth.

[MorpheusParticipant 14]

Okay. My English isn’t that good so you’ll see some grammatical mistakes upon my writing.

[HimeoParticipant 471]

Morpheus wrote:

Okay. My English isn’t that good so you’ll see some grammatical mistakes upon my writing.

No. Your English is good. The problem is women don’t know how to say what they mean. They speak in code.

[Anonymous 1]

Yeah man. It is not English that you have to learn… Is Womanish… It is a tricky language since it is totally irrational.

Good luck! 🙂

[Smitty the Great OneParticipant 1535]

Morpheus wrote:

Apparently, Poverty is sexiest according to Beyonce and Lady Gaga.

And I’m suppose to give a f~~~ about what these brain dead penis covers are clucking about?

Life is too long to play by someone elses rules....

[peterfaParticipant 833]

So, because poverty is dominated by men, the women want to invade even that?

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Check out the post I made about MGTOW winning. You can put some numbers to these trends.

btw: I don’t think there is anything irrational about what women say. You just need to know the dielect of womeneze their speaking. When talking to sub-human they talk dismissively.

But all you have to do is ignore all she says. Look at the situation in reality. Imagine what’s best for her and screw everybody else. Then whatever she’s saying means the thing that’s best for her whether her words are manipulation or the truth.

Kinda like Sherlock Holmes.

When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains,however improbable, must be the truth?’ Sherlock Holmes

When you eliminate the manipulative irrelevant stuff she says and only think about what she wants, then that’s the truth of what she’s saying.

Example: When she says “I want you to open up and tell me your feelings” what she’s really saying is “You’d better tell me everything your thinking, so I can better manipulate you, or there will be constant nagging and serious hell to pay. This hell usually consists of her being nasty and withholding sex.

Women hate men that keep their own idea’s. Independent thinkers scare the s~~~ out of feminists.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[нσтησσвParticipant 830]

Poverty isn’t sexist, women are just dumbasses.

Past few years, i’ve been living off $5000/yr, well below the poverty line and in one of the worlds most expensive cities to live in.
Poverty line in canada is about $20k/yr.

I also get 0 help from the gov.

Anyone with half a brain can live well below the poverty line while having similar luxuries as those with average incomes.

In this case, poverty is sexist, because women don’t have the thought capabilities to handle it.

My Goal: To Leave Society.

[Smitty the Great OneParticipant 1535]

If Poverty is indeed the sexiest, then a God am I…..

Life is too long to play by someone elses rules....

[IggyThundersParticipant 246]

нσтησσв wrote:

Past few years, i’ve been living off $5000/yr, well below the poverty line and in one of the worlds most expensive cities to live in. Poverty line in canada is about $20k/yr.

 

Okay. I’ll bite. How do you live off of $5,000 a year? Just for one, Its almost impossible to find an apartment (unless you want to live in the hood) for under $800 a month. I am not trying be combative. Honestly. I really want to know? Because if you have figured out a way to live off of $5,000 a year with no Govt. assistance and can still maintain a decent semi-middle class lifestyle I want to know your secret? S~~~. Most of Canada and the USA would love to know!

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

IggyThunders wrote:

and can still maintain a decent semi-middle class lifestyle

A lot of what goes into what is popularly considered a “decent semi-middle class lifestyle” is completely unnecessary.  It’s amazing the expenses you can do without once you realize they add no real value to your life.  Take cable / satellite television for example.  Why the hell would any sane man spend $100 a month for a hundred channels of worthless feminist programming?  That’s $1200 you’ve saved every year right there.

Of course the real trick is continuing to live on less than $5k a year even when you’re earning $50k or more, because a man earning six figures doesn’t need a hundred channels of worthless feminist programming either.

[MorpheusParticipant 14]

@ H.R . Pufnstuf : ill keep on mind about your post.

@ Hot Noob: of course women find poverty sexist because they can’t live for themselves. They need ‘support’ from the media and the government to take action. Poverty is no joke. Once you enter poverty, you can’t do anything about as you get no assistance from anyone. But women need the support and strength from the msm to leave poverty. But men are used to being ignored by society.

[Smitty the Great OneParticipant 1535]

I live on about 5K a year, it’s not easy, but it is relaxing. I own my $12,000 house, and I live in an area where the cost of living is incredibly low. my utilities are less than $100 a month internet included.I do a lot of bartering and odd jobbing. I found a certain level of comfort-ability and maintain it. If it weren’t for a friend offering me a good paying job elsewhere I might have never left, but now that I’m accustom life on the cheap, life making 4 to five times as much should be a piece o’ cake.

Life is too long to play by someone elses rules....

[IggyThundersParticipant 246]

sidecar wrote:

A lot of what goes into what is popularly considered a “decent semi-middle class lifestyle” is completely unnecessary.  It’s amazing the expenses you can do without once you realize they add no real value to your life.  Take cable / satellite television for example.  Why the hell would any sane man spend $100 a month for a hundred channels of worthless feminist programming?  That’s $1200 you’ve saved every year right there.

I hear you. I dumped cable years ago. Now I spend about $50  month for internet access as well as $10 a month for Netflix. Still, no matter how much you dump I still cant see how one can survive on $5,000 a year. I mean, I guess you can? But thats more existing than living.

 

Smitty the Great One wrote:

I live on about 5K a year, it’s not easy, but it is relaxing. I own my $12,000 house, and I live in an area where the cost of living is incredibly low. my utilities are less than $100 a month internet included.I do a lot of bartering and odd jobbing. I found a certain level of comfort-ability and maintain it. If it weren’t for a friend offering me a good paying job elsewhere I might have never left, but now that I’m accustom life on the cheap, life making 4 to five times as much should be a piece o’ cake.

 

Yeah, Bartering, being knowledgable about how to fix things and living in a low cost area will definitely help you live “Off the grid” in a sense. And I assume your property taxes are pretty low. But my question still stands? And I ask this rhetorically. Not directed at you specifically. How does an average Joe live on $5,000 a year when you have either rent or a mortgage, Property taxes, Insurance for your house or renter insurance, car upkeep and repair, Gas,  dental, medical, heating and cooling costs (I assume you live in a warm state for the low utilities), food, entertainment including eating out, alcohol, tobacco (if you smoke), clothing (unless everything is second hand or Walmart), and tons of other things? Like I said, bartering and knowledge helps a lot, especially for things like car and or home repair. But I just dont see how its possible for the average man to live on $5,000 a year. The people I have know who did live that close to the bone were invariably like your average Hoarder types and one step above homeless. Their homes were  a wreck and falling apart, animals everywhere, their clothes were dirty and rags, their personal hygiene was horrible, their teeth rotting out of their head, and they were honestly a little bit crazy. The other Hippie types were just as nutty. They would dumpster dive for almost everything (food included) and make their own shampoo, soap and all that other crap which turns into a full time job in itself. So again, how can a sane man who is not particularly handy or can live a bartering lifestyle live on $5,000 a year ? And I mean LIVE. Not simply exist. I am hoping to get some real concrete answers. Hopefully HotNoob will return to this thread.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

IggyThunders wrote:

I hear you. I dumped cable years ago. Now I spend about $50 month for internet access as well as $10 a month for Netflix.

Why do you need netflix?  Most libraries have movies these days for free, and that’s certainly better than $10 a month.  Most libraries also have free WiFi.  Are you paying for both a phone as well as internet access?  With the right software and firmware you need only pay for one, and not even that if you can get free WiFi.

Why would you willingly pay property taxes?  You’re only subsidizing man wrecking welfare baby mommas when you do that.  Move somewhere that they don’t impose them.  Minimize your heating costs by learning to be comfortable at 60°F.  It’s not hard.  How much do you really need to spend on clothing a year?  I know women who say they “need” at least 300 different shoes, at least 90% of which are exactly the same, but you’re a man.  How many shoes does a man really need?  If you save your money like a man and don’t demand a larger home than you need like a woman, in just a few years of keeping your expenses minimal you can go without a mortgage even with an average income.  It’s insane how much interest can drain from you, so never pay interest.  Pay cash on the barrel or go without.  Buying only raw ingredients and learning how to cook will slash your food budget, and if you get good at cooking you’ll end up eating better than you ever have before.

The point is that you can live comfortably on $5k a year.  It is approaching the bare minimum, but it is doable.  If you’re smart and disciplined it’s not a choice between the overpriced “middle class luxury lifestyle” and a derelict on the street.  Most derelicts would do much better if only they were a little smarter and had a little more foresight.  Of course a lot of them are actually going through a lot more than $5k a year.  Street drugs aren’t exactly cheap.

[Radickal LogickParticipant 0]

Since about 80% of homeless people are men and the prevalence of women with college degrees is steadily exceeding that of men, the notion that “poverty is sexist” (the implication here being, of course, that it’s sexist against women) is ludicrous.

What’s even more absurd is that this idea is being championed by some of the wealthiest women in the world.

[Author]

Posts