I was emailed a copy of the Misandrists prayer yesterday from a male family member that has been recently divorced.
This and the and the recent post by MGTOWmonkey (Link) seem to tie in with each other.
Today’s feminine culture has set up women for a lot of unhappiness. The fervent adherents, and the seems-like-the-right-thing-to-doers, are dragging the rest of woman kind with them.
Modern feminism reminds me of the self esteem movement that has its roots in the 1980’s. There was little if any empirical evidence to support the practice, but gosh darn it, shouldn’t a child feel good about himself? BTW, the prison system is loaded is sociopaths that have high self esteem. Self esteem has no direct corollary to success or happiness. Yes you can feel really good about yourself and still not be happy.
Modern feminism has done everything it can to label male behavior negatively. From “micro aggressions” to the “male gaze”, modern feminism, either directly or indirectly, seems to have the agenda of tearing men down on the individual and social/cultural level. Whether this is the agenda or not, it is still the affect that it is having on men in western society. To be slapped in the face is still an assault, justifying it with some altruistic reason such as preventing the West Nile Virus by killing the mosquito on your cheek is a demand that I stop complaining. The problem is, I didn’t see, hear, or feel the mosquito on MY f~~~ing face. In other words, “Don’t p~~~ on my boots, and tell me it’s just the rain”.
This paradigm is further compounded by men that rub their cheeks and say “Thank you”. Those that don’t buy in to this cognitive dissonance dare not defend themselves. Women are equal, they just don’t want to be treated equally. This has been supported on both a cultural and legal level to the point that women don’t just have their own agency by a “Hyper Agency” that enables them to behave in the most destructive manner, then even the more rational of feminists attribute it to the need for women to express themselves. Despite the most lunatic fringe ideas of winnowing the male population to 10% of current numbers to some Marxist societal ideal the would require violent implementation on the same level as Pol Pot did in Cambodia. They seem to still believe that radical social, political, economic, and even religious change can be justifiably implemented through Stalinistic purges. The reason they never succeeded is that the right people were not in leadership positions. Not one peep from the mainstream media. Not one peep from the more sane in today’s modern feminism.
In comparison, liberals espouse Islam as a religion of peace, but you don’t hear one Imam speaking out when a bomb explodes and kills women and children.
Frank Herbert once wrote that revolutionaries are, at their core, aristocrats. All of these women that you hear demanding change want to wield very real political power. Political power translates to the force of law. The force of law always has a gun as the ultimate tool of compliance.
Stalin once said that political power comes out of the end of a gun. So if we go back and re-read what MGTOWmonkey’s posting, then give in 100% credence, what we can see is that women want political power because of the feelings of inadequacy that comes from trying making internal comparisons and not doing as well as men. Political power that has a gun in its pocket.
"I asked you a question. I didn't ask you to repeat what the voices in you head are telling you" ~ Me. ........Yes I'm still angry.
The Librarian 4 years, 1 month ago.
