Pattern of female "Short Circuit" in discussions

[Ho Lee Fuk, MGTOW!Participant 100]

lol. I’ve spent my entire life dealing with this exact issue with my Mother (even when i was 12 year sold i was already more developed than her mentally). Except she’s so stupid i dont think i’ve ever successfully simplified the matter in a way that she can understand, even after she’s calmed down. She gets p~~~ed at me for having to repeat things, not realizing she’s the only one i’ve only ever had to do it to considering most others (including women) seem to get it the first or second time round. I think my Mom operates entirely on an emotional level, because i’ve yet to see her use any real intellect. No Surprise though being Asian i grew up in a trad con household, so everyone of her needs was met by my father and myself she’s been living her whole life in a state of “Intellectual Torpor”.

Regarding pitching themselves false (but feels right) information, i think its a way to absolve themselves of any agency. By not acknowledging the right/truthful information, she gets to throw it back at you & make you explain yourself so she can wait for you to slip up or just get so tired of explaining your point that you just give up and she gets to feel like she won. If you keep pushing the matter the “Stop shouting” “Stop making me feel bad” lines along with tears and tantrums come out until eventually one side breaks (in many cases either way it’s you, the man who will really lose at the end of the day with wasted time and effort). They’ll weasel their way into being the Victim almost every time.

[narwhalParticipant]

Definitely seen this. The question was raised as to which is stronger, emotion or logic? That depends on who’s turf you’re going to play on.

By that I mean, do not argue on emotion, ever. Do not give emotion any value whatsoever. You’re having a discussion/debate and she starts getting emotional, so you end the conversation right there, no exceptions. When she starts making statements designed to bring out emotions, to get you mad, sad, or feeling sympathetic and guilty…you end it. Anything she says that isn’t based on logic is to be ignored.

My ex once told me that she needed more money because her step daughter now had car payments. It’s an emotional plea to make me feel guilty and has no logical relevance…so it’s ignored. She once implied that her new husband cared more about my son then me as he was willing to pay for blah blah blah while I didn’t (directly). I ignored that too. I could have easily reacted emotionally to these comments, but that is not my wheelhouse…it’s hers. So I won’t play the game that way.

Mark Twain is quoted as saying “Never argue with stupid people. They will bring you down to their level and beat you with experience”. You could easily replace ‘stupid’ with ’emotional’.

Ok. Then do it.

[NeroParticipant 1466]

Yes, this whole emotional reasoning thing is a scientific fact. My marital counselor stated many times about the right-brain/left-brain thinking. One being emotional, the other rational. She said once the emotional brain is triggered, it can take over 30 minutes to calm down. Both sides of the brain cannot function simultaneously, hence the inability of women to make any logical sense while in a fit of f~~~ing rage.

Every man here who says to step away during these fits is absolutely correct. The problem is it is easy to get hooked at the f~~~ing unbelievable s~~~ they throw at you during these emotional fits. I highly recommend ignoring the bulls~~~ they say and focus on disengaging. If whatever they say is highly insulting, use that opportunity to deploy silent mode tactics. Trust me this s~~~ works.

[VarunParticipant 2981]

narwhal wrote:

Definitely seen this. The question was raised as to which is stronger, emotion or logic? That depends on who’s turf you’re going to play on.

By that I mean, do not argue on emotion, ever. Do not give emotion any value whatsoever. You’re having a discussion/debate and she starts getting emotional, so you end the conversation right there, no exceptions. When she starts making statements designed to bring out emotions, to get you mad, sad, or feeling sympathetic and guilty…you end it. Anything she says that isn’t based on logic is to be ignored.

My ex once told me that she needed more money because her step daughter now had car payments. It’s an emotional plea to make me feel guilty and has no logical relevance…so it’s ignored. She once implied that her new husband cared more about my son then me as he was willing to pay for blah blah blah while I didn’t (directly). I ignored that too. I could have easily reacted emotionally to these comments, but that is not my wheelhouse…it’s hers. So I won’t play the game that way.

Mark Twain is quoted as saying “Never argue with stupid people. They will bring you down to their level and beat you with experience”. You could easily replace ‘stupid’ with ’emotional’.

That makes a lot of sense. Maybe that’s why I cannot win those emotional battles with females in my life…. they always have something to counter logic… like for eg. I would sometimes forget to bring medicines for my mother and she would say “So you don’t even care about me?” I’d say “I do care but I was pre-occupied with a lot of stuff…..blah blah blah” but god help me to make her understand my point.

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

[Knights Templar RisingParticipant 5106]

One of my buddies at work has been trolling dating sites for several months now. Since he works in a technical field, he was surprised how many women state in their profile things like “I dislike overly logical men…”.

HAHAHAH, and these post-40 wallers wonder why they can’t find a man? No sane man wants a woman who bases most her decisions on emotion. HAHAHAH. Good luck holes…

Sovereignty above all else.

[NerevarParticipant 8040]

Anonymous wrote:

Varun wrote:

Women have better emotional tools

I find emotional tools to be useless unless you enjoy a 3 hour conversation about “feelings” because you didn’t hang the towels properly.

Oh gods. “That towel in the bathroom is NOT for drying your hands, it’s there to make the bathroom look better, you asshole!”

"One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K

[Anonymous 1]

Nerevar wrote:

joller984 wrote:

Varun wrote:

Women have better emotional tools

I find emotional tools to be useless unless you enjoy a 3 hour conversation about “feelings” because you didn’t hang the towels properly.

Oh gods. “That towel in the bathroom is NOT for drying your hands, it’s there to make the bathroom look better, you asshole!”

You know it, brother 🙂

[the roadParticipant 3125]

Big Boss wrote:

I was listening to a Tom Leykis episode about females beginning to lose their attractiveness over the hill at 30, and I notice something from an upset female callers that I always tend to observe in females in general.

A “short circuit” happens when they get emotional. Basically, they don’t listen to the actual words being said because they get caught up in their emotional connotations and provide “non sequitur” arguments as a response. Even if you repeat and clarify it many times, they can’t seem to process it correctly.

For example, this is what was said:
– Leykis stated clearly “they BEGIN to loose their attractiveness.”

– She “hears” and argues “Are you saying that 30 year olds are no longer attractive?!”

He clearly didn’t say 30 year olds are not attractive. He stated that the process of aging around age 30 begins to increase from around that age on. So even if she began to sound calmly initially, she was already mentally revved up on the wrong information she clearly gave herself. And this goes on for several minutes trying to get her to f~~~ing understand.

Now here’s why I bring this up, other than it happening way too much in conversations with women. In females, mentally, they are already pitching an argument with false information they told themselves (perhaps their own benefit?), that we obviously are not aware of at the beginning of it about to get heated.

Her mind is no longer processing information with logic and has already switched to emotion based. You actually have to repeat it several times and make it simple enough for them to f~~~ing clue in on what is actually the issue.

Almost like putting bread crumbs in front of her to get her back on the issue. I think even Bill Burr mentioned something like this when he said he was on a winning streak with arugements “keep arguing the point.”

It is something we never really give a definition too, but it ALWAYS f~~~ing happens, which leads to us simply calling them crazy, and etc. Females are oblivious that they are emotionally compromised when they hear something that offends them.

It’s a good old fashioned strawman argument. Very popular technique these days. For example, someone says something about not liking Colin Kaepernick sitting down during the National Anthem and the rebuttal to that is: you are racist against black people. The technique builds up the “strawman” which is an artificially injected argument and then they attack it (the strawman). You give it validity by attempting to defend yourself against something you never said.

It’s very effective, especially if there is an audience, because the person being accused will often back peddle and stumble over their words. This breaks down their argument as they lose concentration.

Women learn this technique at a young age. It’s a big tool for manipulation. Every single woman I ever dated used this technique on me.

For example, one of my exes back in college always had or wanted to go to sleep early. She expected that I should want to do the same. I had a late schedule however and I didn’t want to go to bed early. As long as I wasn’t hanging out with friends she was okay with me staying up late. But if I was hanging out with my friends she would accuse me of not wanting to spend time with her.

Her: “Why am I less important to you than your friends? You don’t want to spend time with me, you don’t want to be in a relationship with me.”

Me: “How can I spend time with you if you are asleep? Do you really expect me to sit there and watch you sleep?”

Her response would predictably be illogical. She would then bring her “feelings” into the argument and if I didn’t validate her feelings then I was a selfish jerk who didn’t care for her. And if that didn’t work she would then pull out the ultimatums. “If you don’t *blah blah blah do what I say* then *repercussions* will occur.”

Spoiled brat.

Oh yeah, I tossed her to the curb and she tried to get me back for months unsuccessfully.

#MANOUT

[TwistParticipant]

I think framing it as logic vs emotion gives it too much credence.

I now see it as logic vs illogical.

Why argue with someone who is illogical?

Better to go your own way.

[Author]

Posts