Outcomes on this New Phase of the War on Men?

[TwistParticipant]

Some absolute gold in this thread. I just wanted to highlight two comments that had me nodding like an idiot. Thanks. More reality in this single thread than an entire week of MSM.

sidecar wrote:

From now on women will always be seen as a false accusation risk. Women really have f~~~ed themselves with this one.

But that is not our problem.

Trapper wrote:

Deep down they want kids and security. They’ve declared war on the provider of both. You don’t win a war by bombing your own factories. It may be considered a successful mission, but the outcome is detrimental.

I assure you men will win this war. The moment they walk away.

[TwistParticipant]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

Am I the only one that thinks there isn’t going to be any serious consequences of this for the vast majority of individuals?

Every, single one of the “accused” is of celebrity status and a house hold name.

I see the current crop of accusations as just a specific weapon in a larger war. Sure – these accusations are targeted at a very specific segment of the male population.

But – “vast majority of individuals”? Yes – these have already been, and continue to be, targeted with similar effect. This is known as divorce rape – accusations, financial and emotional destruction, suicide. What we talk about every single day. Since the “vast majority” of men have historically married (or cohabatated), we/they are all being targeted.

Doesn’t matter if you get shot in the head or step on a Claymore. Still a casualty of war.

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

I have seen the results of women in management.

With women in the military, maybe we can adopt new forms of warfare:
– if enough women monkey branch to opposing generals and high ranking officers, maybe we can knock them off with STD’s.
– if enough women cavort with opposing forces, maybe the opposing forces would just go insane. Or at least head for the hills.

[Cú ChulainnParticipant 3910]

1. Women force men out of higher education by a ratio of 90%-10%. STEM makes up the 10% of university undergraduates who are male, but their numbers are greatly reduced meaning science and technology stagnate. Biology is a defunct subject, as is evolutionary psychology, the latter being declared illegal.

2. Women take over the running of all large companies, governments and corporations. Men continue to perform the dirty dangerous jobs, managed by women. Infrastructure begins to break down, public money gets wasted on a feminized building and maintenance solution, that doesn’t work.

3. The military is run by women, they all fail the previous standards in military selection to certain front line roles – Infantry, special forces. The standard is then lowered, infantry and special forces disappear. The military is feminized and becomes pacifist.

4. Islamic conquest of the feminist utopia, God destroys the world.

[RomulusParticipant 4667]

It depends on how men withdraw from women. If men play it cool, women will continue being frustrated by men who aren’t making themselves available.

I agree, stay cool, underplay it and leave the women wondering. Is it me? Women are nothing if not insecure.

How can a woman be expected to be happy with a man who insists on treating her as if she were a perfectly normal human being.

[Emperor HeracliusParticipant 317]

Cú Chulainn wrote:

1. Women force men out of higher education by a ratio of 90%-10%. STEM makes up the 10% of university undergraduates who are male, but their numbers are greatly reduced meaning science and technology stagnate. Biology is a defunct subject, as is evolutionary psychology, the latter being declared illegal.

2. Women take over the running of all large companies, governments and corporations. Men continue to perform the dirty dangerous jobs, managed by women. Infrastructure begins to break down, public money gets wasted on a feminized building and maintenance solution, that doesn’t work.

3. The military is run by women, they all fail the previous standards in military selection to certain front line roles – Infantry, special forces. The standard is then lowered, infantry and special forces disappear. The military is feminized and becomes pacifist.

4. Islamic conquest of the feminist utopia, God destroys the world.

This definitely seems to be the trajectory to where global society is heading. The highly feminized and weak West has lost its will, its sense of survival, and all of its momentum to progress forward in a rational way. The other parts of the world (Russia, China, the Islamic Caliphates) are gathering strength and have the momentum…they want it more than us nowadays.

"Admit no woman to the imperial councils. Be accessible to no one. Share with few your most intimate plans."

[sidecarParticipant 35862]

Handsome Vic wrote:

Women don’t displace men in the workforce because women don’t actually do the work.

Well, I pointed out some places where statistics can be found which indicate this is indeed happening in certain sectors.

You mean women are actually doing the work?

Sorry. No. Just no. It doesn’t happen that way.

I don’t take kindly to be called a liar regarding my own work experiences.

Help me out here. You are replying to my criticism of you going to extra work to use the quoting system on these forums incorrectly, and this is how you respond?

I’m not calling you a liar. I’m calling you someone who doesn’t comprehend the subject matter and doesn’t know what the statistics he’s reading actually mean. And who can’t be bothered to use the quoting system correctly.

. I asked: name a company that has done so?

I just told you one. Who makes iPhones?

Are you intentionally being this obtuse? Are you trying to troll?

– I predict that women will increase the pressure for more quotas in choice jobs.

And then those companies that keep increasing quotas will either fail or move, because women don’t actually do the work. Filling quotas is a cost of doing business, not a means for productivity, and inevitably the cost becomes too high to sustain.

[SandalsParticipant 4254]

PuniShredder wrote:

Wrong again. It’s perfectly legal to record anything anyone in public. In The US:)

A troll is one who ignores citations and common facts, cites nothing himself, and simply recites a lie as if it is a truth.

*sigh* this site is under constant attack. Sucks.

[Author]

Posts