Home › Forums › Marriage & Divorce › Organ donors IN LOVE OH MY!
This topic contains 7 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by
Phantom 3 years, 3 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Check out the link below and witness an idiotic white knight in ACTION!
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2016/10/26/strangers-fall-in-love-after-organ-donation.html
Question: He saved her life, how long before she starts f~~~ing CHADS on the side? I give it 3 months.
A surgeon saved his wife life in 2009 – by giving her a kidney – and ashe started banging someone else and wanted a divorce. Just an horrifying story when I first read the headline: “Give me back my kidney or $1.5 Million”.
She slapped him with divorce papers when he was in surgery trying to save another person’s life. Batista insisted his cash-for-kidney claim was a direct result of his wife’s behavior. She wouldn’t even let him see his three daughters – ages 14, 11 and 8 – in months.
Should have let her die, but that’s the difference between men and women and husbands and wives. A man doesn’t marry with intention to divorce.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.The key from the key master. .
Men don’t marry with the intention of divorce.
.
MGTOW gospel truth!Damn, even when you are a Dr. and save a woman, they still f~~~ you over.
Jesus Christ
I know it isn’t any wonder, but f~~~.
Just when I think these broads can’t possibly get any lower…
I, Lelouch Vi Britannia, command you, all of you, to Go Your Own Way!!
Jesus Christ
At the time that example really done me in, because I have seen that behavior in women in smaller doses and varying degrees. It’s “Briffault’s Law” incarnate, really.
Briffault’s Law
The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place. There are a few corollaries….
• Past benefit provided by the male does not provide for continued or future association.
• Any agreement where the male provides a current benefit in return for a promise of future association is null and void as soon as the male has provided the benefit (see corollary 1)Goddam right.
British Surgeon Robert Stephen Briffault already understood that about women 100 years ago. And he didn’t even need to give his wife a kidney first.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.Check out the link below and witness an idiotic white knight in ACTION!
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2016/10/26/strangers-fall-in-love-after-organ-donation.html
Question: He saved her life, how long before she starts f~~~ing CHADS on the side? I give it 3 months.
Having watched the video, her SMV is higher than his so I suspect she just did this for the publicity. I agree, 3 months later she will tell him how she “loves him but isn’t in love with him” after she monkey branches to a Chad.
For women, everything eventually boils down to Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
At the time that example really done me in, because I have seen that behavior in women in smaller doses and varying degrees. It’s “Briffault’s Law” incarnate, really.
Yeah, still trying to wrap my head around it. Thanks for sharing about “Briffault’s Law”.
I need to watch it a few times more, at least…and let it really sink in.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
