Opinion as Fact

[MoreSkyParticipant 4865]

A random ramble through some stuff I’ve been thinking about:

Taking the red pills and becoming MGTOW has changed my perception of many things and one of the most noticeable (to me) is that it has has vastly increased my ability to spot bulls~~~.

One of the inherent traits of liberals, social justice warriors, feminists, soy boys and other f~~~wits is the inability to comprehend that they might be wrong and in presenting opinion (generally based on p~~~-poor or no information) as fact, and castigating anyone who dares to challenge their sub-standard thinking.

Rather than considering the merits of someone else’s opinion they will continue to present their weak viewpoint as fact and use shaming language or throw up irrelevant chatter in an effort to distract. The opinion being stated is irrelevant, they just don’t want to believe they can be wrong and will cling on to the most tenous of points to try and “win” the argument. Facts are not important, only that their self-image is preserved and that they are seen by their peers as righteous and infallible.

One of the problems, from a bloke’s perspective, is that feminism has so indoctrinated the collective mindset to unquestionably believe women. We have seen this in the #meToo idiocy and at individual level when women use the “one phone call” or present false DV claims during a divorce or otherwise – the hive will have believed this and it becomes fact in their minds instantly.

As MGTOW, we are by definition, doing our own thing in our own way and this often gets on other people’s t~~~, even other MGTOW.
However, as MGTOW we have the power of NFG to ignore such bulls~~~, and if someone is talking utter bollocks we can just think “She’s a lying c~~~” or “He’s being a self-important dickhead” and then forget it and get on with something more interesting.

I believe that being able to spot bulls~~~, recognise opinion from fact, not giving a f~~~ about irrelevant horse-s~~~, not be precious when someone disagrees, and understand that you might be wrong are important skills for MGTOW.

This is my opinion. It is not a fact.

"...reinvent your life because you must; it is your life and its history and the present belong only to you.” It is Your Life, Charles Bukowski.

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

I have run into that a lot, opinion articles used as fact by snowflakes.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[MonkParticipant 16983]

MoreSky wrote:

I believe that being able to spot bulls~~~, recognise opinion from fact, not giving a f~~~ about irrelevant horse-s~~~, not be precious when someone disagrees, and understand that you might be wrong are important skills for MGTOW.

It is also the main difference between an adult and a child.

And that’s a fact.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22510]

Monk wrote:

MoreSky wrote:

I believe that being able to spot bulls~~~, recognise opinion from fact, not giving a f~~~ about irrelevant horse-s~~~, not be precious when someone disagrees, and understand that you might be wrong are important skills for MGTOW.

It is also the main difference between an adult and a child.
And that’s a fact.

Libs, women and children are really all the same developmentally when it comes to responsibility and entitlement. So many similarities. not surprising that so many women are liberal, particularly young single women. The traits and thought processes are identical.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[AwakenedParticipant 35201]

MoreSky wrote:

Rather than considering the merits of someone else’s opinion they will continue to present their weak viewpoint as fact and use shaming language or throw up irrelevant chatter in an effort to distract.

You have just accurately described the fake news media that is pumped to the sheeple through multiple outlets 24/7/265.

MoreSky wrote:

This is my opinion. It is not a fact.

These are INTERCHANGEABLE to your average Libtard.

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[RhinoParticipant 3477]

These teachers are taught to do this it has been going on even when I went to school in the early 90’s from grade school all the way up to college/university. It started ramping up in the early 2000’s and hasn’t let up since it has only gotten worse. Here is an example found here of how they teach in their classrooms.

28 Signs That U.S. Public Schools Are Rapidly Being Turned Into Indoctrination Centers And Prison Camps.

Even when caught doing it the teachers don’t care this one was asked to resign in Israel of all places and he refused. Link.

Teachers caught indoctrinating children to Antifa violence.

Link:

School that forced children to write essays about Muslims being ‘excluded’ apologises after outraged families accuse teachers of ‘indoctrinating’ students.

-Leumeah High School in Sydney is testing Year 12 students on ‘Muslim exclusion’

-Society and Culture students assessed on ‘barriers Muslims face’ in Australia

-An older brother of a student described the task as ‘indoctrinating the young’

-Department of Education spokesman said the question would now be changed

These are a variety of teaching methods that teachers employ and a list can be found here.

If you read through this article you will find many methods but the ones that the teachers who are paid to indoctrinate employ the most is the Direct Instruction (Low Tech) approach.

Direct instruction is the general term that refers to the traditional teaching strategy that relies on explicit teaching through lectures and teacher-led demonstrations.

In this method of instruction, the teacher might play one or all of the following roles:

As the primary teaching strategy under the teacher-centered approach, direct instruction utilizes passive learning, or the idea that students can learn what they need to through listening and watching very precise instruction. Teachers and professors act as the sole supplier of knowledge, and under the direct instruction model, teachers often utilize systematic, scripted lesson plans. Direct instruction programs include exactly what the teacher should say, and activities that students should complete, for every minute of the lesson.

Because it does not include student preferences or give them opportunities for hands-on or alternative types of learning, direct instruction is extremely teacher-centered. it’s also fairly low-tech, often relying on the use of textbooks and workbooks instead of computers and 1:1 devices.

As you can see there is no room for discussion as to what is being taught as the teachers themselves are taught to make sure they stick to the point and not deviate from the lesson being taught regardless if it is wrong. Text books that were once full of factual information are being rewritten to fit the new false narrative.

Inquiry-based Learning (High Tech)

Based on student investigation and hands-on projects, inquiry-based learning is a teaching method that casts a teacher as a supportive figure who provides guidance and support for students throughout their learning process, rather than a sole authority figure.

In this method of instruction, the teacher might play one or all of the following roles:

Teachers encourage students to ask questions and consider what they want to know about the world around them. Students then research their questions, find information and sources that explain key concepts and solve problems they may encounter along the way. Findings might be presented as self-made videos, websites, or formal presentations of research results.

Inquiry-based learning falls under the student-centered approach, in that students play an active and participatory role in their own learning. But teacher facilitation is also extremely key to the process. Usually, during the inquiry cycle, every student is working on a different question or topic. In this environment, teachers ask high-level questions and make research suggestions about the process rather than the content. At the end of the inquiry cycle, students reflect on the experience and what they learned. They also consider how it connects to other topics of interest, as an inquiry on one topic often results in more questions and then an inquiry into new fields External link .

Inquiry-based learning can make great use of technology through online research sites, social media, and the possibility for global connections with people outside of the community. But depending on the subject at hand, it doesn’t necessarily require it.

In the first link that I posted above at the start of this you will find how the teachers use this method to subvert a sound teaching method into one that becomes less beneficial to the student and instead used as an indoctrination tool.

In Virginia, Liberty Middle School teacher Michael Denman forced his students to identify weaknesses in each of the Republican presidential contenders. They were then asked to develop a strategy to expose these flaws and research where they’d send their plans to reach President Barack Obama’s campaign. Much to the shock and dismay of conservatives, the students weren’t asked to vet Obama in like manner.

But should we really be surprised? America’s schools are infested with left-wing teachers. The facts are there to prove it.

Finally even in college and universities the students are taught to hate western civilization and ignore historical facts because they are racist. Here is a link to this article from fox news that although should be shocking is the norm across the world.

Today’s students don’t know what liberty costs. They can’t identify between good and right. They have no sense of what “exceptionalism” means. They don’t know how history got us to where we are today, and why its bloody path was worth it.

Can you answer the following questions?

Who fought in the Peloponnesian War?

Who taught Plato, and whom did Plato teach?

Who was Saul of Tarsus?

Why does the Magna Carta matter?

What are one or two of the arguments made in Federalist 10?

Hard questions, right? Maybe not. Maybe you learned some or all of the answers in school, or you knew them at one time, but have now forgotten the details. Or perhaps you are devoted to a few events that you have internalized and helped form you into the person you are today.

But knowing the answers in great detail may be less important than recognizing the importance of the questions.

Unfortunately, Stanford University students may never realize how significant and meaningful these questions are because the student government earlier this week voted overwhelmingly against requiring students to complete a two-quarter course on Western civilization.

That’s right. Instead, the student leadership, validated by its Pravda-esque mouthpiece, The Stanford Daily, concluded that supporting Western civilization basically equated to “upholding white supremacy, capitalism and colonialism, and all other oppressive systems that flow from Western civilizations.”

Apparently no one taught this up-and-coming generation that Western civilization is full of the theoretical underpinnings for things like democracy, equality, freedom, liberty, is the source of many of those sticky philosophical foundations for arguments in support of ending human oppression and slavery, and developed the economic principles responsible for pulling billions out of poverty.

So where does this leave us? Facts are replaced with opinion because children are taught at a early age to ignore facts. Indoctrination on a global scale has a dramatic planned negative consequence by the global elite to dumb down the population who are never taught to think logically. Some children will speak up against this and those that do are called problem children and fed drugs or removed from the class room if they become a distraction. Parents who are working could care less what their children are taught so long as they don’t have to babysit them while they are at work although some parents wise up and remove their children from this environment at great cost to them or their pocket book. It will take another generation once all these teachers are removed to fix this problem and I don’t see that happening anytime soon.

[harpo-my-“SON”Participant 2410]

Statutory construction of truth self evident is all I need to put on the full armor..

I was bound to be misunderstood, and I laugh at those who misunderstand me. Kind mockery at the well intentioned, but unfettered cruelty towards those would be prison guards of my creative possibilities. This so as to learn as much from misunderstanding as from understanding. Taking pleasure in worthy opponents and making language fluid and flowing like a river yet pointed and precise as a dagger. Contradicts the socialistic purpose of language and makes for a wonderful linguistic dance, A verbal martial art with constant parries that hone the weapon that is the two edged sword of my mouth.

[Author]

Posts