OH GOD – "NOT ALL WOMEN….."

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Anonymous wrote:

Eh I know what’s in your post but I didn’t bother reading it. Next time a woman complains about men, just NAMALT. Tell them no divorce, no child support. Tell them to get rid of rape laws. Then when they say women get raped, just say NAMALT. No need for laws and courts! Because NAMALT!

Well that’s the important difference.

When men wonder “why are women such greedy, controlling, gold-digging, back-stabbing bitches?” – and someone says “NAWALT – it’s still true that MOST women are like that.

When women say “All men are rapists” – it’s actually true that most (damn near ALL) men are NOT rapists.

Big difference.

“NAWALT” is just mangina-speak for: “I am aware MOST women are like that. But you should think *NOT ALL* of them are. “. They don’t even realize they just told the world MOST women are everything on that list…. but not all of them.

And are you ready for the punchline?

IT PAYS HUGE to think “all women are like that”.
A man will never be rewarded, paid, or benefit that much from believing “not all women are like that”.

REPEAT: No woman will ever pay or reward you for believing the opposite.
They just want you to take their word for it.

When not all grenades are like that, and you pull the pin…. the BEST thing that happens is >>> you don’t die.
The BEST thing that happens if she is ‘not like that” is: she won’t bulldoze and destroy your life.

WOW!! WHAT AN AWESOME F~~~ING SELLING FEATURE!!! NAWALT!!! SIGN ME UP!!! Those f~~~ing idiots.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Not All Women Are Like That, or NAWALT, is true in the formal logic sense. In real life the odds against meeting a NAWALT have to be expressed in astronomical numbers.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[KeymasterKeymaster]

RoyDal wrote:

Not All Women Are Like That, or NAWALT, is true in the formal logic sense. In real life the odds against meeting a NAWALT have to be expressed in astronomical numbers.

Of course. Consider the list of NAWALT statement “not all women are crazy” or “not all women are…. XXXXXXXX”.

It’s a list of things they expect us to think women are NOT. or – NOT all women ARE.

Why are they trying to convince ME?? Or YOU? Or — all MEN?

If a woman doesn’t want to be thought of as “not like that”… then it’s up to HER to SHOW that she is not like that. Why are they trying to convince other MEN? It’s up to women to show they are not like that…. not up to men to be brainwashed. Men already do a great hob in the vast majority of actually proving that MOST men are not rapists. Women have actually shown the world they are home wreckers in the VAST majority. These “good men project” assholes don’t expect women to do the work! They just expect men to believe it blindly.

That’s the real key.

When a woman says “not all woman are like that”… it does nothing to show SHE is not like that.

Its time for women to SHOW they are “not lie that” and they are already WAY too late.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

Then we have our answer:

Pussy: Not all women are like that.

Dick: Prove it.

How could she do that? If she’s saying she’s one …. then she will have to go from dating to wife to mother and old age …. to prove she a unicorn.

It’s as unrealistic a statement as it is to prove.

[WolfParticipant 890]

Tom Leykis brings up a great point. If she has to say it, then she is likely the opposite of what she says.

[JollyMisanthropeParticipant 3356]

I don’t care for the NAWALT acronym. I prefer not all women have reached that point.

It implies that they are capable of going to the extreme but have yet to do so.

The Children of Doom... Doom's Children. They told my lord the way to the Mountain of Power. They told him to throw down his sword and return to the Earth... Ha! Time enough for the Earth in the grave.

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

EWALT will be the prevailing narrative in less than a decade.

 

[UnbelievableyetnotParticipant 512]

Even one man getting destroyed because of unfair laws, policies and rights is unacceptable and one man too many.

“Lets not change the system because NAWALT” = some men will be casualties but just cross your fingers and hope it isn’t you!

[KingOfTheSeaParticipant 1270]

Keymaster wrote:

When not all grenades are like that, and you pull the pin…. the BEST thing that happens is >>> you don’t die. The BEST thing that happens if she is ‘not like that” is: she won’t bulldoze and destroy your life.

NAGALT?

[Anonymous 0]

Hi AFT,

AFT wrote:

The only thing that counts is WOMEN have all the rights, and MEN get screwed, end of story.

That’s it.
Let me add, if the women have all the rights, how worthwhile are these rights if nobody likes women anymore.

[Anonymous 0]

@kingofthesea

KingOfTheSea wrote:

Not all women……….

That’s really good written.

@Ned Trend

KingOfTheSea wrote:

About the only one that actually is remotely close to being right,……

I cannot translate this in german so that it lost its meaning, can you help me?
Thanks

[BDParticipant 1146]

Keymaster wrote:

See you in a few years. The MGTOW introductions forum is waiting for men like that. We will reserve a spot for you.

All women are like that, every single one.

The only reason any of them ever temporarily appear to be a NAWALT is because they are trying to manipulate you so that they can be in a position to extract your resources.

Of course the duration and quality of this act of manipulation will directly correspond with the possible amount of extractable resources.

As soon as they achieve this position of resource extraction(married, common-law, pregnant)), or they realize that they will be unable to extract your resources (prenup, vasectomy), the NAWALT will use its unicorn powers and magically turn into the usual c~~~.

Because in order to be able to think, you have to risk being offensive.

[KingOfTheSeaParticipant 1270]

Anonymous wrote:

KingOfTheSea wrote:

About the only one that actually is remotely close to being right,……

I cannot translate this in german so that it lost its meaning, can you help me? Thanks

Yes, sorry. I meant that when the writer of the article wrote that “Not all women are perfectly innocent”, it was the only statement in the article that was even close to being true.

[DurdenParticipant 1051]

You can make your very own NAWALT unicorn by strapping a dildo to a horses fore skull.

The longer I have been red pill the more tendencies I seem to notice in women that are all the same. The self-conscious of looks. Jealousy over other women flirting with a guy. Massive insecurities they have. What kind of biology makes it so women get turned on by other women hitting on you. The way they want to be dominated and how their defiance makes them to be even more so. The way they act like borg in that they same the same consciousness. Yet still being younger my c~~~ betrays me at times.

It's only after we've lost everything that we're free to do anything

[GrumpyParticipant]

Sure , I can agree with that in theory (NAWALT).

Having said that. It has been my personal experience interacting with women , throughout my 50 years of life so far, that it is just a theory.  Every decent female I have met, and then entered into an intimate relationship with, quickly disproved the NAWALT theory.

Every last one of them quickly began playing emotional, psychological, and financial games. Add into that the apparent need to control every aspect of the relationship. From isolation socially to financially crippling me, to trying to dictate what my personal history was and what my future goals were. Each and every one, regardless of what level of relationship we were in, attempted to RULE ABSOLUTELY, while not actively investing in the relationships, just taking what they could from it and criticizing every effort I put forth as not enough. Guess what, after a while I got tired of putting any effort forward for any relationship of any kind.

Just for a perspective, that is 200 or so intimate relationships in my personal history since I was 16 years old. 2 failed marriages, 2 additional engagements that didn’t end in marriage accounting for 10 years in total time for 4 LTRs at a cost in excess of $525,000.00. (That is over 1/2 a million dollars folks.. Currency exchange rates don’t mean a thing, <span style=”text-decoration: underline;”>think about that sum in your money</span>). The remaining 24 years were one night stands and  short term (a few weeks to a few months, never more than 1 year) relationships, normally ending exactly 1 second after SHE pops a red flag.

So my experiences so far,  has led me to the conclusion that searching for the theoretical/mythical NAWALT, is a colossal waste of valuable resources, as well as too emotionally debilitating.

NAWALTs are like Psychics, if there is a real one that needs to get a hold of me, she knows where I am….

Yes ladies, I know its all my fault. Now shut up and f~~~ off already.

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[Anonymous 0]

@kingofthesea
I got it, thanks pal.

Durden wrote:

The longer I have been red pill the more tendencies I seem to notice in women that are all the same. The self-conscious of looks. Jealousy over other women flirting with a guy. Massive insecurities they have.

Yes, all right and it is so obviously and you can see it everywhere. They just even don’t notice and realize their own behaviourals and how they appear to others.

[experiencedParticipant]

A dynamic complex set of feedback loops leads to, “Every guy is just one blowjob away from falling off MGTOW.” The synergy with laydeez boggles the mind: timing of their behavior as a function of your up to the minute degree of being pussy whipped, the sex drugs that the brain and body internally manufacture and their effect, group vs individual behavior, macro timing, micro timing, et al.

It was all designed to propagate the species so it’s extremely powerful, but when such a force is misused to the degree it is today, choosing to stay away from it is the only sane response.

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[peterfaParticipant 833]

You never hear a “NAMALT,” from women. They’re always saying this or that about Men. It’s Men. Always just men. Not, those men who did this  or that, or whatever, it’s men. No girl says, “Wait, not all Men are like that!” They all nod in agreement.

If you’re a man, you don’t have a name, nor even a number. You’re a project of the men.

[BDParticipant 1146]

Grumpy wrote:

Every last one of them quickly began playing emotional, psychological, and financial games. Add into that the apparent need to control every aspect of the relationship. From isolation socially to financially crippling me, to trying to dictate what my personal history was and what my future goals were. Each and every one, regardless of what level of relationship we were in, attempted to RULE ABSOLUTELY, while not actively investing in the relationships, just taking what they could from it and criticizing every effort I put forth as not enough.

That is exactly my experience Grumpy,

The women I have dated/LTR  have been so upset and miserable because I would not conform to the hamster wheel life and let them isolate me, kill my dreams,  and extract my resources.

I am now choosing to do women a favour, as I do not wish to make any more of them miserable, so I will no longer date them, and am going my own way, problem solved, cheers!

Because in order to be able to think, you have to risk being offensive.

[RockmaninoffParticipant 1641]

I agree that NAWALT is a deflection, and I like Keymaster’s grenade analogy but I do want to play devil’s advocate just for a bit:

 

Is it possible that it’s easy to get the perception that all women are home-destroyers solely because we hear horror stories when they happen; and we don’t hear about the happy women in happy relationships, because they’re busy being quiet and happy?

 

Keymaster in another thread said that it would take only one woman to change the system, by telling a gynocentric judge awarding gross amounts of money in alimony and child support to f~~~ himself. What about Billy Piper, the actress who portrayed Rose Tyler in Doctor Who? She refused to rape her husband in divorce.

". . . elle, suivant l’usage des femmes et des chats qui ne viennent pas quand on les appelle et qui viennent quand on ne les appelle pas, s’arrêta devant moi et m’adressa la parole"—Prosper Mérimée

[Author]

Posts