NY Times Thinks Husbands Are Deadlier Than Terrorists

[DDJParticipant 1880]

Apparently, the New York Times believes husbands are deadlier than terrorists…and apparently murderous DV perps.

Actual Quote from the Article:

Above all, fear spouses: Husbands are incomparably more deadly in America than jihadist terrorists.

And husbands are so deadly in part because in America they have ready access to firearms, even when they have a history of violence. In other countries, brutish husbands put wives in hospitals; in America, they put them in graves.

Few things can be more dehumanizing and sexist.

Every woman is a slut, if you catch her on the right day.

[MonkeyMindParticipant 5340]

That’s it then. Time to outlaw marriage.

[experiencedParticipant]

NYT is doing our work for us.

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[GrumpyParticipant]

Just another libtard.
In one breath extolling the “virtues” of marriage, in the same breath calling husbands “terrorists” among other derogatory names.

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[Solo MAN’S WisdomParticipant]

MonkeyMind wrote:

Time to outlaw marriage.

It’s for gays anyway.

When women lead, destruction is the destination. -- Me.

[Anonymous 1]

Marriage is an unconstitutional government contract.

[Freeman_KParticipant 3524]

I remember a book i was reading when i was a kid, a sci-fi dystopian story set in the future where humanity lives concentraded in megacities withing superskyscappers and they never leave the scyscapper they are in. Relations between genders were basically open cuckoldry where women sleep around their hive as per her whims.

Man, did not understand anything back there but that is prophetic and exactly the way where society is going. Give women power and their hive collectivist freedom hating mind with construct exactly this, a frigging vanity fueled hive prison.

The choices we make, not the chances we take, determine our destiny

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

How did this writer even get on their staff???
The sheer perversity of his logic, comparing husbands to terrorists, is beyond absurd. BTW most terrorists are husbands so that kinda weighs the stats down even more.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Anonymous 1]

That’s a f~~~ing stupid argument.

100% of terrorists are dangerous.

.01% of husbands are dangerous.

Comprende ?

I’ll give you another stat: 99% of NYT opinion writers are liberal f~~~tards

[GnosticParticipant 2491]

Freeman_K wrote:

I remember a book i was reading when i was a kid, a sci-fi dystopian story set in the future where humanity lives concentraded in megacities withing superskyscappers and they never leave the scyscapper they are in. Relations between genders were basically open cuckoldry where women sleep around their hive as per her whims.

Man, did not understand anything back there but that is prophetic and exactly the way where society is going. Give women power and their hive collectivist freedom hating mind with construct exactly this, a frigging vanity fueled hive prison.

When I am young I read some sci-fi novels where two alien races fought among each other and then by chance they found out that they are male and female of the same species.

At that time I thought nah, that will never happen, after unplugging from the matrix, it seems creepily prophetic.

I think the Japanese made two novels like that too, Vandread and Marcoss Zero.

There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

[GnosticParticipant 2491]

MonkeyMind wrote:

That’s it then. Time to outlaw marriage.

Yes Yes!

There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

[experiencedParticipant]

NYT recommends that men say “NO” to marriage lest they be turned into terrorists.
NYT says to men, “Do Not Marry”.
NYT recommends that men not allow themselves to become married.

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[Y_Participant 4591]

Let them write more – really go for it. All it will do is quicken the exodus.
All for one and more of me.

[ZoidbergParticipant 965]

Getting in a car is more deadly in America than jihadist terrorists. In fact, a whole lot of things are more deadly than terrorists (PDF).

[KeymasterKeymaster]

DDJ wrote:

Apparently, the New York Times believes husbands are deadlier than terrorists…and apparently murderous DV perps.

False.

Just fax the New York Times this little gem and they will be forced to retract.

Sorry NY Times. The emotional terrorists are the wives and girlfriends and everyone knows it.

That is why they don’t allow comments.
Because they can’t AFFORD to be wrong.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 54]

He is only partly correct. From my jury duty experience I learned that its not the guy on the street with a knife you need to worry about. Its anyone who says I love you!
But..
Its an eqaul split male/female.

So..

Marrage is more dangerous than terrorism.

NEVER GET MARRIED

no terrorist has ever tried to kill me. But my wife did!!!

HEED MY WARNING

[narwhalParticipant]

The title really doesn’t fit the message that author was trying to communicate. His message was that the actual threat of being killed by terrorism was rather low, and that you are more likely to be killed by gunfire. Basically, pro-immigrant, anti-gun. The mention of husbands was just a flashy statistic that the editor tried to capitalize on.

To me the article is clear example of how the media scopes the article with facts to fit the message, leaving out key details that will totally derail the false reality.

Yes, the chance of being killed by a terrorist is very low. Yes, there have been no terrorist from those 7 countries. Both facts are irrelevant. But you leave out the fact that we do not have good vetting from those 7 countries, and the President of Syria himself stated that he believed terrorist were posing as refugees.

And sure you have a greater chance of getting killed by your husband. But he doesn’t mention that marrying a man who isn’t a thug with a criminal record has a very, very low risk, while marrying a thug is practically guaranteeing you will come to some harm.

The author claims that Trump is fear mongering with ‘the terrorists will get you!’ and then fear mongers with ‘the guns will get you!’

Ok. Then do it.

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

Good, they can leave us alone now.

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[ConstantineParticipant 4416]

DDJ wrote:

husbands are deadlier than terrorists…and apparently murderous DV perps.

Women should stop nagging then.

To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell

[Author]

Posts