NY Times justifies wife’s BullS~~~

[CombatRollParticipant 2594]

Check out how the NYT justifies this wife being a cold fish c~~~ to her hubby and then glorifies her screwing Chad.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/11/magazine/is-an-open-marriage-a-happier-marriage.html

[Anonymous 42]

The NY Crimes has as much credibility as the Bluffington Post!

Ask a 3 year old what’s really going on, you’re better off!

The link is dead (regular), I have to open it manually in a new tab, or hold Ctrl and click.

[AwakenedParticipant 35201]

Better off ignoring THEIR Feminazi CRAP !!

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[Anonymous 18]

Whores and simps. Match made in gynocentric heaven.

[Truthseeker82Participant 6406]

What a joke! She gets to spread her legs open wide for any and all chads. He probably gets no further access to her pussy – although who would want it after so much c~~~ – and when she finally dumps his simp ass – she gets his cash! Woo hoo! Where do I sign up?

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

That NY Slimes article is bulls~~~.

What a life for the husband. The best he can hope for is to get sloppy seconds from the wife and to not get divorce raped by the cheating whore.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[Truthseeker82Participant 6406]

What happened to journalists like Walter Cronkite and Edward R Murrow? Solid unbiased news that mattered. Now we have s~~~ like this along with the C~~~ington Post.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

I got hip to the female glorification (and romanticization) of cheating wives since before Bridges of Maddison County – with Clint Eastwood & Meryl Streep.

The husband goes to off to work for a few days, she stays home, they make the farm wife look as bored and “oppressed” & unfulfilled as possible…. and at the end, the husband had no idea his wife was milking and daydreaming about Eastwood for years, and his dying words are “I’m sorry you had your own dreams and I didn’t make them happen”, and she taps him on the chest with her fingertips – as if to silently say “that’s OK dear, I still got some D on the side. I forgive you.”.

Man cheats, he’s a pig. Women cheats, she’s an angel and he’s an asshole who din’t take care of her “needs”, but she forgives him because he provided a roof over her head for 50 years.

They’re still up to the same s~~~. Everyone see how that works?

Let that be a clue.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

From the comment sections this woman admits all you are is a utility to make her some babies, support her and then be dumped when she is done with you.

Don’t marry, don’t co-habitat, don’t impregnate -MGTOW.

The idea of marriage as a lifelong monogamous exclusive commitment is ridiculous and obsolete. It may have worked when the average life expectancy was 35. But does anybody seriously believe that it is possible to be with the same person for 50 or 60 years and not get bored out of your mind? When I married my first husband at the age of 21, I knew it was not forever and indeed, I divorced him 15 years later, when the kids were older.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[MarketWatcherParticipant]

Noticed that drivel too. Pure NYT bulls~~~. Even the gays are cucking themselves. Did you see the fat ass tattooed bitch? Damn? People are lining up to f~~~ that?

[narwhalParticipant]

Open marriages don’t make sense to me. I mean if it’s only about sex, then I can somewhat understand it. I was married before and it’s not like I never found myself sexually attracted to other women. If there were no consequences to having sex with them I would have. I don’t know that I would have been comfortable with her having sex though. That’s because she couldn’t really detach sex from emotions as I could tell, nor did she expresses enough sexual interest in me to believe that it wasn’t an attempt to replace me.

What this article talks about though, it’s talking about emotional connections. I don’t understand how that can be shared. You can have multiple friends and have connections at that level, but I don’t see how you can share a connection at a higher level. I don’t get it. It seems to me that if you go that route your faking the emotional connection on one side or the other. You’re pretending to be emotionally connected to your sex partner, because they want that or you want to tell yourself you aren’t a slut. Or, you are pretending to be emotionally connected to your husband so that you retain his utility and everything else that comes with being married.

Maybe women’s minds are wired differently, but I doubt it. From what I’ve seen women are just very adept at lying (to themselves as well) and masters of manipulation.

Ok. Then do it.

[Can’t Stump TrumpParticipant]

“Daniel liked sex, and not long after they were married, it became clear that Elizabeth’s interest in it had cooled.”

Truly a unique scenario.

Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.

[GrumpyParticipant]

Meh
I am in my own “Open Marriage”.
I call it bachelorhood.
Anyhow why would I tap into the empty keg called marriage?

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[Author]

Posts