MGTOW invades China!

[sidecarParticipant 35862]

Billy&The Cloneasaurus wrote:

Hypergamy is a hardwired biological instinct.

Human behavior is more complex than that. Hypergamy is only extant under certain circumstances which reward it such as (false) resource abundance. By corrolary, civilization is largely just what happens when hypergamy is denied.

Rampant hypergamy in China (and the rest of Asia and elsewhere) is a sign (and a cause) of the collapse of that civilization. MGTOW are merely Men walking away from that collapse while they still can.

[MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To GiveParticipant 6635]

Anonymous wrote:

I got a great laugh out of that article. It follows the same pattern we’ve been talking about for decades. The same types of things written on The Predatory Female and The Manipulated Man.

First off, the article was written by a woman. As we all know, women don’t give even the smelliest, sloppiest of diarrhea s~~~s about men until it concerns women.

We also know women will use nothing but shaming language, while projecting their own fears and insecurities, whilst trying to hide them and claim a total superiority. You already know all of this, my words are only a meager attempt to distill it as concisely as I can.

Then of course is the female centric idea that you are either having sex (or more accurately, RAPING AND HARASSING women) or you are a nerdy loser that sits there playing video games and are a PARASITE. This is rich coming from women. They’d have you believe they built all of society, that they are all the engineers, the physicists, the farmers, the drivers. Once again that female fantasy that they created and built all of society and kept it running, and men are stupid losers that can’t do s~~~.

We all know the reality. We know how inept women are, how intellectually lazy they are. Even the wording there is so telling. OMG NERD! LOSER! NERD! Those are the exact same words they have for any male that has any academic, scientific, cultural or other interest. Meanwhile women are busy thinking about how to paint their faces with crayons, what clothing they can wear to make their bodies look different, what scents to put on themselves to hide their smell, what high heel shoes of the tens of dozens to wear that night to change their height. I have never met a woman that would look up String Theory or browse through The Republic for fun. Oh no, that is torture to them, and they will scream how its for NERDS. While of course bragging how smart they are the entire time.

And then the final element that got me the greatest laugh. The comments section. All the blue pill men falling all over themselves to talk about HOW MUCH OF A REAL MAN I AM! Suddenly all of them pretending they are bagging different hot young women every night, just James Bonding it up so coolly. These same men are the first to scream along with women about RAAAAPE and SEXUAL HARASSMENT and all that other bulls~~~, because they are pretty much all virgins or have a low single digit partner count—which consists of middle aged, fat women that they had to buy after they’d hit the wall.

Asian men tend to be smarter than most other races. If the high IQ men see something is rigged, they make the smart move: don’t play.

Low IQ men are just like women in that they make up a fantasy world and just think they can babble themselves a fantasy life that doesn’t work out in reality. I always advise people don’t hang out with idiots, because that is all idiots do, and idiots will eventually drag you into their thinking.

So read this type of article only to laugh at the female writer panicking as her blue pill orbiters reassure her and feed her ego. It won’t change anything.

I’m about to go watch an episode of anime. This next episode is for you, female writer!

Classic point of view as always Phoenix! I read the comment section and it’s full of simps thinking they can get laid/validation through a comment section. These are the same type of men if given a position to change legislation to bury men they will in a heartbeat for vagina. It saddens me to see how far some men have fallen.

Never lose sight of what brought you here.

[Billy&The CloneasaurusParticipant]

sidecar wrote:

Billy&The Cloneasaurus wrote:

Hypergamy is a hardwired biological instinct.

Human behavior is more complex than that. Hypergamy is only extant under certain circumstances which reward it such as (false) resource abundance. By corrolary, civilization is largely just what happens when hypergamy is denied.

Rampant hypergamy in China (and the rest of Asia and elsewhere) is a sign (and a cause) of the collapse of that civilization. MGTOW are merely Men walking away from that collapse while they still can.

Interesting. You seem to be making two points, and please correct me if I’m wrong:

1) hypergamy thrives under conditions of abundance

2) Civilization emerges most readily when hypergamy is denied

Civilization, such as it is, is a prerequisite for abundance of resources. That’s essentially the point of organizing as a species. In your view, this results in rampant hypergamy. I don’t disagree, per se, but I do believe this behaviour predates civilization and is encoded in the biological hardware of women. Modern abundance simply gives women more opportunity to express this instinct.

Women are always looking to better deal their men, not because of conditions today, but because of conditions of lesser abundance. They can’t help their coding. They are hypergamous, which makes total sense in an environment of scarcity, but is obscene today.

2) You are saying that modern civilization creates hypergamy, but civilization occurs when hypergamy is denied. I kind of get a sense of what you are trying to say, and it’s not off the mark. Civilization thrives when certain base instincts are kept in check. This includes hypergamy and general sexual debasement, as well as unrestricted violence that everyone is capable of.

Without restrictions on these animal instincts, we would never have built civilization.

You are wrong that hypergamy is created or brought out by abundance. It’s hardware, not software. We merely see it out in the open today.

We wouldn’t have built society without restricting this base animal instinct (the same way we needed to restrict murder, etc), correct.
But, you are wrong in asserting that abundance causes these instincts.

The answer, is no.

[Deadly RaverParticipant]

Today, we bring you another aspect of that equation; lame, feminized Chinese men who refuse to step up their game and get laid.

They even said it themselves: Feminized men. And just who do you think feminized these men? Anybody want to take a guess at the answer?

And the lame part. How I laugh. They would go so far as to even admit there is a sickness, but they dare not analyze it that you may better understand the sickness, and then possibly find an answer for it. Why? Because they know just like I do what the true problem is.

It isn’t that Those men haven’t,”Stepped up their game”……………They have taken their ball and gone home. They have realized that this isn’t their problem. They have no incentive to care for or about Society and articles like this one will only serve to push these men away even further until they disappear completely. Society has been run like a game for so long and now it is Society and the many who are in it that may be on the verge of losing once and for all. Those “Nerds, creeps, losers, etc.” will not forget you and won’t lift a finger to save you now that you need them. It is about to be a long, dark, and lonely ride to the grave, so please strap in tight. I wouldn’t want for you to miss it.

Learn from the past, Control the present, and you will know the Future.

[Anonymous 3]

Deadly Raver wrote:

Today, we bring you another aspect of that equation; lame, feminized Chinese men who refuse to step up their game and get laid.

They even said it themselves: Feminized men. And just who do you think feminized these men? Anybody want to take a guess at the answer?

And the lame part. How I laugh. They would go so far as to even admit there is a sickness, but they dare not analyze it that you may better understand the sickness, and then possibly find an answer for it. Why? Because they know just like I do what the true problem is.

It isn’t that Those men haven’t,”Stepped up their game”……………They have taken their ball and gone home. They have realized that this isn’t their problem. They have no incentive to care for or about Society and articles like this one will only serve to push these men away even further until they disappear completely. Society has been run like a game for so long and now it is Society and the many who are in it that may be on the verge of losing once and for all. Those “Nerds, creeps, losers, etc.” will not forget you and won’t lift a finger to save you now that you need them. It is about to be a long, dark, and lonely ride to the grave, so please strap in tight. I wouldn’t want for you to miss it.

Zerohedge used to be a good site 5 years ago, but then it sold out to the same liberal leftists it originally would call out. Since then all it does is support the bankers and oligarchs and the leftist agenda.

I miss the days where they’d post articles busting the financial circle on the 2008 collapse or the LIBOR rigging. Zerohedge was always permabear and dumb because of that, but now all they really seem to do is attack Millennials and mock the working classes. So pretty much the same as any mainstream news site. Even this article, we’ve seen the exact same one several times before, and even on Zerohedge previously, they’re just recycling it.

[sidecarParticipant 35862]

Billy&The Cloneasaurus wrote:

1) hypergamy thrives under conditions of abundance

Hypergamy is only possible under conditions of abundance. Usually that abundance is false.

2) Civilization emerges most readily when hypergamy is denied

Not quite. The rise of civilization and denying hypergamy are practically synonymous. Civilizations do not happen at all when hypergamy is tolerated.

tl;dr: Bonobos might have a primitive society, but they will never create a civilization.

Civilization, such as it is, is a prerequisite for abundance of resources.

Not necessarily. Bonobos exist solely because they occupy a small region of relatively high abundance.

Civilizations can create abundance, but usually the surplus is consumed by the expansion and maintenance of the civilization. A surplus is not the same as abundance.

I don’t disagree, per se, but I do believe this behaviour predates civilization and is encoded in the biological hardware of women.

But it’s not the only behavior hardwired into women. We have a wide and varied evolutionary legacy of behaviors which are enhanced or suppressed depending on situational conditions.

Modern abundance simply gives women more opportunity to express this instinct.

Except it’s a false abundance. The “abundance” modern women experience only exists by forcibly taking the surplus generated by Men and handing it over to women. This disconnect and disruption of the pair bonding behavior evolved into hominids permits women to operate on a more primitive behavioral model to achieve reproductive success.

tl;dr: Hypergamy isn’t a human instinct. It’s an ape instinct.

Women are always looking to better deal their men, not because of conditions today, but because of conditions of lesser abundance. They can’t help their coding. They are hypergamous, which makes total sense in an environment of scarcity, but is obscene today.

You have that exactly backwards. Under conditions of scarcity a woman is far more likely to pair bond to lock down a man’s resources and surplus of labor for herself and her progeny. Hypergamy is only successful under conditions of abundance where she doesn’t depend on the dedication of a male provider.

You are saying that modern civilization creates hypergamy,

No. I’m saying that hypergamy is a cause and symptom of the collapse of that civilization because the surpluses necessary for maintaining and expanding that civilization have been diverted into the bellies of women and bastard children.

civilization occurs when hypergamy is denied.

Civilization and hypergamy are mutually exclusive. Civilizations have inertia so it’s often hard to see this until after it’s too late.

You are wrong that hypergamy is created or brought out by abundance.

No. I am 100% correct about that.

It is no coincidence that the most hypergamous societies are either the most primitive societies or the most socialist / feminist (which create a false abundance for women).

But, you are wrong in asserting that abundance causes these instincts.

Again, abundance allows hypergamy to be a successful reproductive and behavioral strategy for women. Abundance doesn’t create the behavior; it merely permits it.

[iMickey503Participant 12468]

GOOD!.

Lets face facts here, CHINESE MEN ARE NOT STUPID. They are not going to risk giving up their freedom or money. Not when there is something better around the corner.

Women are not going to change. They are going to keep doing what they are doing. And these men see that women only want men that have things. You think that does not hurt a guys ego?

When MEN see women just for what they are, how are you going to tell a man that a woman is WORTH IT?

What is a Government to do? Tell MEN that WOMEN are NOT THAT WAY? Haha ha.

Nope. MGTOW is the ONE THING that saves MEN. And That’s not going to change.

As men get more and MORE wealth, and see just how great it is having all these things, and seeing others just MISERABLE with women. What are you going to do?

The TRUTH is OUT THERE. You can not avoid it.

I mean look at all the Dating sites? Look at how women are naturally behaving now? How are you going to cover that UP?

You either face facts and see that WOMEN and the laws of having a family are not only TOXIC to men. But they are so far f~~~ed up that there is NO reason for a man to get married or have a family today.

With WOMEN in the workplace, and MEN no longer willing to bother taking care of women that are just going to cheat on you and leave you anyways, and take all your resources.. Why bother?

The IDEA of a Family was based on that WOMEN LOVE YOU. Now that its out of the bag that WOMEN DO NOT LOVE YOU for YOU. What are you going to do now?

So if by having a woman, you end up being vulnerable, and a woman is NOT an asset. And you see single men doing better then YOU? Are you going to sign up for this BULLS~~~?

NOPE.

Even if laws change that make it 50/50, men are NOT going to fall for this s~~~. Women are going to actually have to be an asset to a man. If she is NOT?

Oh well.

There will be PLENTY of outlets for men to have sex all around the world. They can no longer use the LOVE or SEX angle if there is a better option.

And as far as kids go? If a man is wealthy enough for Children, he is going to have them CLoned or made so the only person he is going to be responsible for is his OWN CHILDREN.

The Artificial womb WILL BE COMING. And women with all their Biological shortcomings are going to be left out in the cold.

So if you have

1. Better sex with an artificial doll, or ROBOT.
2. Robots able to take care of your own house and food making..
3. Reproduction with better results with Artificial wombs and cloning?
4. Never have to worry about a woman taking your resources or hard earned cash.

Would you MARRY or BE WITH A WOMAN that can say YOU RAPED HER? Throw your ASS IN JAIL?

NOPE NOPE NOPE.

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[Anonymous 3]

sidecar wrote:

abundance allows hypergamy to be a successful reproductive and behavioral strategy for women. Abundance doesn’t create the behavior; it merely permits it.

I think it is MEN that permit hypergamy.

In times of abundance men’s values relax and they give in to women’s manipulations.

In times of hardship men cannot allow such self-destructive behaviours. Historically adultery was punished by death. Slim chances for hypergamy to work in such conditions.

There is much to be told about the clear simplicity of hunger.

[TwistParticipant]

bigboy83 wrote:

Germany might be already there.

We have their Ambassador as a resident here. It has clearly arrived there.

Anonymous wrote:

They’d have you believe they built all of society, that they are all the engineers, the physicists, the farmers, the drivers. O

Well, they do build a sweet pedestrian bridge… gotta give them credit for that.

[sidecarParticipant 35862]

Anonymous wrote:

I think it is MEN that permit hypergamy.

I’m speaking purely from the economics of natural selection. Without abundance, hypergamy is a selective dead end, regardless of how men perceive it.

Do you willingly or grudgingly hand over your earnings as taxes to support women and children that aren’t yours? Hypergamy is always a selective dead end for men, so the only men who permit it are literally the definition of cucks.

[G.O.A.TParticipant 1459]

I couldn’t careless.

This is the result feminism has s~~~ out of it’s gaped asshole, and low IQ women are eating it.

Well, bon appetit, bitches.

Money is God.

[Author]

Posts