Nikola Tesla explains Mgtow in 1924….

[aeragoanParticipant 1186]

http://theantifeminist.com/nikola-tesla-explains-1924-mgtow/

check this link guys..

[Anonymous 3]

It’s been like a century, and society is still running. And that includes slaughtering a huge chunk of the male population in various wars, notably WWII. It looks like women can just demand men take up those sacrifice and protector roles whenever they want, and when things are safe go right back to kicking men down again.

All another big war will do is get most of us killed. It won’t actually change anything. Society just keeps going, and women are always comfortable in it.

I really don’t see how men can stand it, without having God to believe in and an afterlife to work for. I have that, so this crazy world doesn’t bother me too much. Still annoying to see just how little males are valued by society, but it doesn’t matter as much since I know there’s something more important to work towards.

Without that, how do people stand it? I don’t get it.

[Anonymous 25]

I remember reading a biography on Tesla. He had a truly remarkable systemising brain. He could predict wear and tear in a machine accurately, because his brain knew the rules of the system.

It comes as no surprise that he predicted this. His brain could do the same and run things into the future to see the likely outcome.

The one thing he may have missed though is that in the years that have passed since, there has been a significant increase in extreme male pattern brains like his own. This increase and male systemising is probably what is leading to men going their own way (whether they identify as mgtow or not).

There are now many men who, even in a corrupt gynocentric system, can use their brains and their ability to systemise to outwit women.

Male bees and ants do not systemise in the way human males do. They have not sent their species into space, or uncovered the mysteries of dna or learned how the human brain works and mastered the arts of persuasion and influence. Male ants and bees do not understand chaos theory and how a small push in the right place can have a huge impact. When this male genius starts to be applied to the problem of gynocentrism as it is now truly remarkable things will happen. We are already seeing google trends shoot straight up as men go their own way.

Women are in for a rude awakening and it is already beginning. Men will use what I refer to as ‘the Tesla strategy’ to out think and outmanoeuvre women and we will win even if hugely outnumbered.

Great find. Tesla is one of my favourite great thinkers.

[FullMetalExoParticipant 2383]

What a great read, thank you.

Anonymous wrote:

how do people stand it? I don’t get it.

Same way as being sober. Life can be great here and now, with ups and downs.

-----------

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

@ Stealthy

I completely agree. Men are natural leaders and women natural followers. Females have always been happy to live in collective grass huts, villages, as long they can hate men along with their sisters.

Building small apartments and renting them for less will ‘tax’ the welfare state at the benefit of the owners, women.

Time to start investing in housing that looks like housing projects with low upkeep and cheap rents. Rents that reap, collectively, a big profit for the owners, men.

Let them take our taxes and turn around and give it right back to us.

Then take that money and keep it, going your own way.

As Hitlary says: ‘It takes a village”. Let’s build them and make a profit.

Even provide cheap day care so these women can go to work to pay us rent.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

aeragoan wrote:

http://theantifeminist.com/nikola-tesla-explains-1924-mgtow/ check this link guys..

Pardon my asking here, but what part of that involves a man going his own way and defining himself independent of the nature of women?  It looks like a fixation on women still.  It does look anti-feminist, which would make sense for that site to quote Tesla on it, but on being MGTOW?  It does look MGTOW in the MGTOW 1.0 (MGTOW Manifesto) sort of way, but not in the living MGTOW way.  Here is the manifesto:

http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2012/01/men-going-their-own-way-mgtow.html

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[GeordieMGTOWParticipant 50]

Anonymous wrote:

I remember reading a biography on Tesla. He had a truly remarkable systemising brain. He could predict wear and tear in a machine accurately, because his brain knew the rules of the system. It comes as no surprise that he predicted this. His brain could do the same and run things into the future to see the likely outcome. The one thing he may have missed though is that in the years that have passed since, there has been a significant increase in extreme male pattern brains like his own. This increase and male systemising is probably what is leading to men going their own way (whether they identify as mgtow or not). There are now many men who, even in a corrupt gynocentric system, can use their brains and their ability to systemise to outwit women. Male bees and ants do not systemise in the way human males do. They have not sent their species into space, or uncovered the mysteries of dna or learned how the human brain works and mastered the arts of persuasion and influence. Male ants and bees do not understand chaos theory and how a small push in the right place can have a huge impact. When this male genius starts to be applied to the problem of gynocentrism as it is now truly remarkable things will happen. We are already seeing google trends shoot straight up as men go their own way. Women are in for a rude awakening and it is already beginning. Men will use what I refer to as ‘the Tesla strategy’ to out think and outmanoeuvre women and we will win even if hugely outnumbered. Great find. Tesla is one of my favourite great thinkers.

 

Who was the author please? I know I could google for a Tesla biography but I want to read the one you did, seeing as how you described the systemising part. I would like to read that one possible. Sounds interesting.

[Just a ManParticipant 934]

So THAT’s why he is the forgotten genius/inventor. Always wondered why this great man is just a damn footnote at best.

Philosophy, the female repellent

[Anonymous 25]

GeordieMGTOW wrote:

Who was the author please? I know I could google for a Tesla biography but I want to read the one you did, seeing as how you described the systemising part. I would like to read that one possible. Sounds interesting.

It was a long time ago that I read the book and don’t have it here, but I had a look online and the title “Tesla: Man Out of Time” by Margaret Cheeney seems familiar. I can’t be 100% certain but I think that was it. The preview on amazon talks about how he created a fireball in his hand and no one knew how he did it and they still can’t even replicate that today. I remember that, so it likely is that book.

If you are interested in reading about male systemising brains, I would highly recommend reading Simon Baron Cohen’s book “Zero degrees of empathy” (I think it’s called ‘the Science of Evil’ in America).

If we look at what’s happening in society we see men are refusing to get married and a lot of women aren’t having children. That means in one generation they are removed from the gene pool. 17% of women have male pattern brains. I’m fairly certain that there are men out there who are instinctively seeking out and reproducing with those females without even realising it consciously. So the percentage of male pattern brains will increase and female pattern brains will decrease. Nature knows best and the system is already adjusting itself, it’s just that no one sees what’s really happening. Women will change because men are breeding undesirable traits, that no longer serve any useful purpose, out of the gene pool. It will take several generations, but it has already started.

 

[Anonymous 18]

IGMOW (I Go My Own Way) wrote:

Pardon my asking here, but what part of that involves a man going his own way and defining himself independent of the nature of women?  It looks like a fixation on women still.

Knowing about Tesla’s personal lifestyle and him giving his views on females forms the basis of why he didn’t get married. Akin to reading an introduction by new member of why he would never marry. Tesla’s rational (to me) comes from a higher plane of thinking because of his intellect and scientific achievements.

I think going one’s way does and should include certain degree of fixation on women’s nature in order to fully comprehend the bad deal marriage/stable committed relationship is for a man.

[GeordieMGTOWParticipant 50]

Anonymous wrote:

GeordieMGTOW wrote:

Who was the author please? I know I could google for a Tesla biography but I want to read the one you did, seeing as how you described the systemising part. I would like to read that one possible. Sounds interesting.

It was a long time ago that I read the book and don’t have it here, but I had a look online and the title “Tesla: Man Out of Time” by Margaret Cheeney seems familiar. I can’t be 100% certain but I think that was it. The preview on amazon talks about how he created a fireball in his hand and no one knew how he did it and they still can’t even replicate that today. I remember that, so it likely is that book. If you are interested in reading about male systemising brains, I would highly recommend reading Simon Baron Cohen’s book “Zero degrees of empathy” (I think it’s called ‘the Science of Evil’ in America). If we look at what’s happening in society we see men are refusing to get married and a lot of women aren’t having children. That means in one generation they are removed from the gene pool. 17% of women have male pattern brains. I’m fairly certain that there are men out there who are instinctively seeking out and reproducing with those females without even realising it consciously. So the percentage of male pattern brains will increase and female pattern brains will decrease. Nature knows best and the system is already adjusting itself, it’s just that no one sees what’s really happening. Women will change because men are breeding undesirable traits, that no longer serve any useful purpose, out of the gene pool. It will take several generations, but it has already started.

 

Excellent. Will check both of those out.

 

I think that theory is sound on the surface without knowing much about it. Yet if you’ve ever looked into r / k selection theory, I would work under the assumption that those 17% are mostly K strategists and breeding less compared to the r strategists anyway, sadly. Not sure k types can win this gene war. I’d assume more MGTOW than not are k also.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

Anonymous wrote:

richardhutnik wrote:

Pardon my asking here, but what part of that involves a man going his own way and defining himself independent of the nature of women? It looks like a fixation on women still.

Knowing about Tesla’s personal lifestyle and him giving his views on females forms the basis of why he didn’t get married. Akin to reading an introduction by new member of why he would never marry. Tesla’s rational (to me) comes from a higher plane of thinking because of his intellect and scientific achievements. I think going one’s way does and should include certain degree of fixation on women’s nature in order to fully comprehend the bad deal marriage/stable committed relationship is for a man.

What I see with a guy being MGTOW is him not marrying, and him doing things that are out of the mainstream, and making it work.  In regards to the nature of women, I am more of a personal preference.  Once you get past the NAWALT reality, and don’t presume if you keep buying lottery tickets, you will find THE ONE to make you complete, you get on with your life and can focus on what you need to do.  As I see it, the main thing is that I won’t adjust my personal boundaries to deal with women in any way, and I will do what I need to do, factoring in I don’t have a woman around.  I don’t need a woman to make my identity what it is, and I don’t have to engages in wars with gynocentric men (manginas and white knights) or feminists.  I can do my own thing and move past it.  And I have a hell of a lot stronger reasons for not having a woman than I do for having one, so the stronger reason rules out.

That is where I am coming for here.  As a preference I don’t do things, and I get on with my life.  I am thinking, with myself now, my ability to master MGTOW for myself, and get a successful life, and then be able to share it with other men who go MGTOW is a LOT more valuable than having a woman in my life and having to do all the relational adjusting and compromise that goes with it.  But, if other men, need to keep that in the back of their mind all the time to go MGTOW, that is fine.  I don’t think all MGTOW need to, however.  An irony here is that, eventhough I am not actively trying to be aware, I am more aware now of how the whole dating and getting a woman scene goes and that “game” and why things work or don’t, and the nature of women now, even while not thinking of it.  It just reminds me how little I need that there, and how little having a woman would add.  I used to operate under delusions that somehow I got a woman, I would have a partner to help out and it would be balanced.  Nope, not with hypergamy.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[Helen be DamnedParticipant 480]

My only objection with the things he said was “Women are becoming stronger than men.” I don’t consider the peons who can’t think for themselves and don’t have the human capacity to understand problems to be men. Women have so destroyed them that they have nothing resembling manhood left, none of the markers are there any longer, they are just the imprints of what their ancestors had. Man has fallen so low, as though we weren’t warned in every myth passed down by our forefathers about what women will do to you, to get even, to get ahead, or simply because. “Hell hath no fury,” because at its core hell is just punishment, evil born of necessity, but woman is evil inherent, evil for the sake of selfishness. The ancient Greeks knew this, thus they created the myth of Pandora. The ancient Hebrews knew this, and they told it in the story of Adam and Eve. There are god knows how many specifically female monsters in myth. The warning signs are there.

"You can keep your soul, I don't want a cell-mate." - Them Crooked Vultures

[The ApprenticeParticipant 59]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHH

*GASPING FOR BREATH*

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

Ohhhhh man, it’s hilarious because I saw some feminist retweet some parts of that whole excerpt like, “I had always thought of woman… far superior to man” and ending it there. Just goes to show the short attention span they have. Probably read the first part of it and said,”I HAVE to tweet this OMG!!”

Example: https://twitter.com/20tauri/status/619543544156569600

[RhinoParticipant 3477]

Bumping this for new members to read this is great stuff. To think this was written in 1924 I wish I found this when I was young he had so much intelligence and wisdom ahead of his time.

Just a Man wrote:

So THAT’s why he is the forgotten genius/inventor. Always wondered why this great man is just a damn footnote at best.

In my opinion he was the best inventor the world has ever seen. He invented stuff that was so futuristic that he was killed for what he knew. Free electricity that can power airplanes, railways, and cars anywhere in the world over the air think about that for a moment. No wires all wireless electricity transmitted freely across the globe.

[AntipathyParticipant 4901]

There’s smart, there’s super intelligent, there’s genius, and then there is Nikola Tesla !!!

[Author]

Posts