Nietzsche's insight on women

[Anonymous 7]

“To be mistaken about the problem of women, to overlook sex antagonism, to dream of equal rights, duties, etc., are typical signs of shallow mindedness. A profound man can only, like Orientals, consider women as property, as a being whose predestined mission is domesticity”

[Silverstone the SecondParticipant]

Nice. Agree. I think it’s wishful thinking at this point. We all want what’s best for women and society, but then now that they have it, we realize they don’t want the same for us. Reality comes to clash with idealism, and so now here I am as a MGTOW.

Good post as always, man.

Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

We did not learn the lesson of history.

Now we’ll be punished by those that have.

I don’t think there’ll be a next time.

[Anonymous 3]

ILiveAgain wrote:

We did not learn the lesson of history.

Now we’ll be punished by those that have.

I don’t think there’ll be a next time.

Women just screamed all men in history were evil oppressive “misogynists” that hated women for no reason. Or they claimed all these men had small penises.

If we take what women said to be true, it shows that women just hate men, period. So it should be no surprise that women hate men now when allowed to run amok.

If men stopped and could think for a second, they’d realize most men are blue pill as all f~~~ing hell. Patriarchy or anything else, men are predisposed to treating women better than themselves. So how could it be possible that all the intelligent men in world history just happened to hate women, despite building empires and constantly preaching to treat women kindly? It’s obvious idiocy to think that way, yet men fell prey to women’s screeching for equality, which was nothing but patent misandry.

The grand irony of it all is, for the first time in world history, I think we now DO have men that are misogynists, after dealing with women’s bulls~~~ for the past 50 years. It was one thing when men could just deny women’s nature, it is another when women forcefully shoved their cruel and selfish natures in broad daylight constantly for 50 years so much so that even the dumbest mantard slowly begins to understand women don’t give a f~~~ about men, and in fact want to see men hurt and impoverished. For the first time in world history, I think there are some men that honestly despise women and female nature. That’s why you see PUAs and all of these other types. Even the average white knight deep down despises women.

MGTOW can hate but don’t. But we aren’t going to lend a helping hand. Like in what’s happening to Germany, I advise all men to stay out of the way and let women deal with their problems themselves. We are not going to save anybody, our capacity to care has been exhausted. Even the most loyal dog will eventually hate you if you beat it relentlessly. It might not attack you, but it will leave.

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

Anonymous wrote:

“To be mistaken about the problem of women, to overlook sex antagonism, to dream of equal rights, duties, etc., are typical signs of shallow mindedness. A profound man can only, like Orientals, consider women as property, as a being whose predestined mission is domesticity”

I disagree with Nietsche. I can’t consider women as property because property has value.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[FrankyParticipant 2338]

uchibenkei wrote:

I disagree with Nietsche. I can’t consider women as property because property has value.

Normally i agree with neitsche but that’s some s~~~ty ass property he proposes we have.
Rather buy a bike.

[NerevarParticipant 8040]

uchibenkei wrote:

Lottery wrote:

“To be mistaken about the problem of women, to overlook sex antagonism, to dream of equal rights, duties, etc., are typical signs of shallow mindedness. A profound man can only, like Orientals, consider women as property, as a being whose predestined mission is domesticity”

I disagree with Nietsche. I can’t consider women as property because property has value.

Oh damn, brother, amen!

"One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K

[SlingshotParticipant 171]

uchibenkei wrote:

I disagree with Nietsche. I can’t consider women as property because property has value.

I think you have to consider when he wrote it i.e. pre 1900 before the birth of the Feminazi movement. . .

[Enjoy The DeclineParticipant 1719]

I read some of Nietzsche’s books, and here is what you should all know. Nietzsche himself was a MGTOW, because when he was young, he had a bad experience with a very charming woman that screwed with his head. He even said that she was very smart since she managed to f*ck with him real bad before his fallout with her. Since that experience, he did not wish to go with any girl anymore because that girl that he had a bad experience with was not very submissive and even said that many girls are like that in general. This is all in his biography book, Ecce Homo.

"Question everything" - Albert Einstein

[AFTParticipant 2722]

Anonymous wrote:

A profound man can only, like Orientals, consider women as property, as a being whose predestined mission is domesticity

I have come to the same exact conclusion myself, woman are chattels, just look at the bible and ancient societies. Modern society is the perversion of nature that treats these creatures otherwise. Women have been lifted to equal status, and the hypocrisy of Feminism constructed to maintain this perversion.

How can anyone claiming to be a strong independent equal condone the hypocrisy of “positive discrimination”. I am equal to you therefore I need this myriad of laws and social constructs to maintain my equality!

Women are chattels and the corrupt social and legal system has turned them into unattractive privileged liabilities.

They had their place, and with it their domestic value, now that they are strong independent equals, lets see them prove it, so far all I see is a bunch of Hippocratic narcissistic liabilities.

When the war cemeteries are half full of the corpses of dead conscripted women, only then will women have earned the right to speak of equality. Sidecar “A man is a success if he gets up in the morning and goes to bed at night and in between does what he wants to do.” - Bob Dylan

[Mango IngawayParticipant 2264]

uchibenkei wrote:

Lottery wrote:

“To be mistaken about the problem of women, to overlook sex antagonism, to dream of equal rights, duties, etc., are typical signs of shallow mindedness. A profound man can only, like Orientals, consider women as property, as a being whose predestined mission is domesticity”

I disagree with Nietsche. I can’t consider women as property because property has value.

Zing!

Let’s face it, most “housewives” are overpayed baby-sitters.

It is a common failing of childhood to think that if one makes a hero out of a demon the demon will be satisfied.

[Anonymous 0]

uchibenkei wrote:

Lottery wrote:

“To be mistaken about the problem of women, to overlook sex antagonism, to dream of equal rights, duties, etc., are typical signs of shallow mindedness. A profound man can only, like Orientals, consider women as property, as a being whose predestined mission is domesticity”

I disagree with Nietsche. I can’t consider women as property because property has value.

I agree. Women are not property. They don’t have the value nor the time to be anything but parasitic. Property presumes that we care enough to give it value. I give none to most women because they simply cannot /will not earn it.

[MgtowWaveParticipant 4352]

If a woman is my property how is it that she gives a f~~~ about me?

So once again the same old problem. Women that don’t give a f~~~ about men.

Having a woman as property would be like adopting a stray feral dog or cat,EXCEPT that at first the woman could and likely would deceive you by acting submissive.

So no I would not “own ” a woman.

I would not have a snake in my bed.No matter how colorful it/she is .

I do not have people around me who don’t care about me as I care about them.

Better to be alone than regret not being alone.

In my opinion submissive woman is a trap.

frankly my dear i don't give a damn

[Author]

Posts