Tagged: Woke up
This topic contains 46 replies, has 29 voices, and was last updated by 
Golgotha777 2 years, 4 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
That leads to my own personal theory, the trickle down theory.
It states that the excess women that can’t go to the top 10% drop their standards to meet those of the top 20%, failing that, top 30% and so on.
The trickle down theory of hypergamy. (lol)
The depth to which women drop their standards and the methods that can be used to speed up this drop in standards is the meat of the PUA movement.
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.
All women want the top 10% of men. Women only even see the top 10% and think all men are like that and the average guys are just hiding their money and are cheap.
I see it slightly differently. I don’t think they believe the average guy is hiding his money, just that he isn’t living up to his potential. He’s slacking and selfish, or just needs a woman’s touch to train him properly.
“Where have all the good men gone?” isn’t about suggesting that they don’t exist, just that they believe men are failing at meeting her demands and requirements through lack of effort. It’s a challenge to do better as she see it.
My ex wife told me about a year in to our marriage “I thought you would change after marriage.” What the hell is that? It’s her saying that she didn’t think I was the guy she wanted, but that they she, and the nature of marriage, could mold me into who she wanted me to be. Even the very statement itself was designed to try and get me to become the guy she really wanted.
Aside, I somewhat think women are vey confused about what there SMV actually is. They’ve been working a propaganda campaign for decades to convince men not to be too concerned about their weight and general health. At the same time, they’ve been buying into propaganda that they can mask any flaw with the right hair, makeup and clothing…and men are too stupid to know the difference. The result is a lot of unattractive women believing they are worth way more then they are in terms of SMV.
Ok. Then do it.
My anecdote was a single personal observation but it was interesting because it was a natural, daytime , casual and public setting – unlike a nightclub or bar scene. They weren’t dressed up, made up , trying to flirt, socialize, or generate attention. It was “raw”.
It almost p~~~ed me off for their own sake and I was so close to asking, “if you thought he was so hot, why don’t you even say hello? Afraid he wouldn’t be interested in you and you’d have to face an uncomfortable reality? “ Welcome to life as a man.
Then they have the nerve to ask “where are all the good men?”.
…. when she will walk right past him and do NOTHING.Even that journalist behaved like being singled out and complimented on her smile by President Trump was “bizarre” , and the comments all said it was “creepy”. But if a compliment from the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES was as unwelcome as she pretends it was, then their **hypergamy** really has nowhere to go but down.
It’s starting to look more like 90% of women would prefer to be mistreated. We always hear it’s about “status” . . . . but you could be President of the United States and they will STILL behave like he’s not good enough even pay her a compliment.
Unreal.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.It almost p~~~ed me off for their own sake and I was so close to asking, “if you thought he was so hot, why don’t you even say hello? Afraid he wouldn’t be interested in you and you’d have to face an uncomfortable reality? “ Welcome to life as a man
I’ve been told by women that men are built to handle that rejection better than women before. I’ve never bothered to follow up on the implications of what that says about women.
I also think that women have a much stronger desire to be desired than men do. They feed off the attention, even if they manufacturer it. So being the one to initiate a conversation won’t feed the need to be desired. She can get a lot more if she see’s just how far she can make a man go to win her favor, so to speak.
Ok. Then do it.
Anonymous42“wingman”
Wingman? like another dude for backup, reason, and instigation? I used to do that when I was in my teens, but I was the one cracking all the eggs and taking all the rejection! I’ve handed off used girlfriends to my friends, I wasn’t ashamed to share a whore in my younger days. Then I grew a conscience, decided to settle down and seriously look for a lifetime mate. Failure after failure ensued as I began to see a pattern of utter disloyalty women had toward men and their love affair with police and the state, they struck the mother load of self consumption by hooking up with the state and trusting that lifetime partnership.
It not only happened to me but most my friends had a brush with the law from just one phone call!
One friend with a spotless record was convicted of harassment and disorderly for flirting with a women that started the flirtation and went berserk because he faked taking her picture!
BOX OF F~~~ING GRENADES!
NO THANKS!
The depth to which women drop their standards and the methods that can be used to speed up this drop in standards is the meat of the PUA movement.
Sharks eating the dead fish.
“if you thought he was so hot, why don’t you even say hello? Afraid he wouldn’t be interested in you and you’d have to face an uncomfortable reality?
Rejection to a woman gives her a good female logical reason to pound a f~~~ing stake through your chest!
BOX OF GRENADES!
Anonymous0PS,
Nice chart. That reminded me that men are graphically oriented and was the inspiration for me to create the DV chart on Jan’s thread: /forums/topic/proof-women-are-more-dangerous/I’ve been told by women that men are built to handle that rejection better than women before. I’ve never bothered to follow up on the implications of what that says about women.
Rejection to a woman gives her a good female logical reason to pound a f~~~ing stake through your chest! BOX OF GRENADES!
Female “rejection” became funny over time.
( What’s she “rejecting”? The ability to steal your house? )Butt seriously . . . the difference between male vs. female rejection is that women try to make “rejection” mean something, and they want it to be devastating. A man just doesn’t call or ask her out again, but women reject with deliberate malice and intent to be hurtful.
• Instead of saying “that guy is interested in me” . . . . she says she “has a STALKER”.
• Instead of saying “the president likes my smile!” . . . . he’s “bizarre and creepy”.
• Instead of saying “he’s just not that into me and my fat ass” . . . . it’s “RAPE!!“.Female rejection is a joke without a punchline. So when they argue “men are better built to handle rejection”, it’s because they have spend the last 20 years of their lives listening to the feminist mantra that “men have no feelings”. In her mind, she can throw a drink in your face, and say “get lost creep”, and you’ll be fine.
Men should start creep-shaming women for a change.
Men are only “better built to handle” rejection because it really doesn’t MEAN anything coming from the type of person who reacts negatively to a compliment. There needs to be a real, existing and visible *value-add* before a rejection can “hurt”. Being receptive to a compliment is not a *value-add*. A complimentative man is adding positive value. A woman who receives or rejects it still added nothing.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.Puff-
Thanks for the graph.
I personally believe the graph to be accurate.I grew up in a poor household and women wouldn’t give me the time of day. Once I got through school and became somewhat successful, the gold-diggers were everywhere.
Ladies don’t want you unless you are in the top 10%. (Screw them)The attractive chicks, while fun to play with sometimes, are too high maintenance. Zero loyalty.
All of the ladies are looking for the “better deal”. Let them have their “10’s”. MGTOW’s are the ones who will be enjoying life.
nothing happens if a MAN doesn’t make the move.
Gospel truth. Women have an insanely irrational fear or rejection (destroys their fragile egos, ha!), yet they still scold men for not “manning up” to ask them out. Sounds like they need to “woman up” to me.
Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.
Even that journalist behaved like being singled out and complimented on her smile by President Trump was “bizarre” , and the comments all said it was “creepy”…
• Instead of saying “that guy is interested in me” . . . . she says she “has a STALKER”.
• Instead of saying “the president likes my smile!” . . . . he’s “bizarre and creepy”.So basically, what you’re saying is creepy means “not interested”. And if the POTUS gives you a compliment, and you toss out the same garbage statement, what it really means is “Can’t rape him for his resources, so… creepy!” Am I wrong?
I constantly recall KM how you suggest ‘you approach a bomb, you approach a tiger, but you sure as hell don’t approach a woman’. Seems like it’s best to just leave it alone altogether. Hell, it would practically seem to make more sense to approach a bomb or tiger; If anything, at least you know WTF to expect.Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...
90% of them will eventually date cats.
I wonder what happens if they are allergic to cats? :^)
So basically, what you’re saying is creepy means “not interested”. And if the POTUS gives you a compliment, and you toss out the same garbage statement, what it really means is “Can’t rape him for his resources, so… creepy!” Am I wrong?
That’s about the size of it.
If the POTUS gives you a compliment….
Everyone knows how women share and show off a stupid rock on their finger to flaunt their perceived “value”…… she did the same with the POTUS compliment.
Except . . .
She had to talk it down for the sisterhood as “bizarre” or inappropriate , because if she showed it off positively and said “Tee hee! Look everyone!! POTUS likes my smile!”, other women would despise her for it.
She appeared to enjoy it in the moment and so did other onlookers, but she PRETENDED to dislike it so she could flaunt it on social media for validation.
“Thank you, Mr. President thats very kind” … is the ONLY acceptable response, and she could say it with a straight and professional face.
“Thank you” – or “no thank you” – is the only acceptable rejection. But women won’t leave it at that, because “OMG I HAVE A CREEPY BIZARRE STALKER POTENTIAL RAPIST!!” is how women attempt to heighten her perceived value to other women, without being hated by them.
So basically, what you’re saying is creepy means “not interested”.
“Not interested” means “not interested”.
Calling a man “creepy” for paying her any kind of compliment means she is insane.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.It also means they hate men to their core.
Calling a man “creepy” for paying her any kind of compliment means she is insane.
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.
( This thread is going mini-viral today )
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.She appeared to enjoy it in the moment and so did other onlookers, but she PRETENDED to dislike it so she could flaunt it on social media for validation.
“Thank you, Mr. President thats very kind” … is the ONLY acceptable response, and she could say it with a straight and professional face.
You can see in her facial expression and eye-rolling briefly around 0:21-0:22 that she DEFINITELY thinks he’s bizarre..
And I just think: MAN, the nerve this woman c~~~ has!
This is the f~~~ing president she’s criticizing/mocking on her stupid twitter page (“bizarre moment”) after he directly complimented her smile.So she thinks she’s cool, now that she gets to call the US president ‘bizarre’. Haha, this is outrageous.
Whether you like the president or not you don’t F~~~ING roll your eyes at him, on your F~~~ING job.
My god.
Anonymous42( This thread is going mini-viral today )
Nice..
Oh, hi everybody! Welcome to the smartest place on earth!
Blowback’s a bitch when you f~~~ with Mother Nature!
_______________________________________ MGTOW 1%
9%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.
Anonymous11how women attempt to heighten her perceived value to other women, without being hated by them.
That’s a damn hard trick to pull to not have women hate you since they are quite prone to it. Manipulation is very effective.
That leads to my own personal theory, the trickle down theory.
It states that the excess women that can’t go to the top 10% drop their standards to meet those of the top 20%, failing that, top 30% and so on.
The trickle down theory of hypergamy. (lol)
The depth to which women drop their standards and the methods that can be used to speed up this drop in standards is the meat of the PUA movement.
just don’t forget, women like the trickle up theory of hypergamy.
Women's brains and vagina have one thing in common. There is nothing in there until a man puts something in there.
Anonymous3I have some stories and thoughts on this, but don’t really have any intention at the moment to write something up. I’ve mentioned things in the past though.
At any rate, there is a missing component on that chart: MGTOW. And by my reckoning, MGTOW are in that top 10%, considering women complain constantly about us not being available to them. Also, I am still of the opinion that women seek the bottom 10% of men primarily. Women are stupid and have bad decision making, this has been well known through history. Obviously they’d seek the bottom 10%, that’s just what they do. That chart needs to be changed to reflect that.
I refuse to accept that a tattooed, drug using, high school dropout, unemployed loser is somehow the top 10%.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
