New Study Finds Tinder is Not Effective in Finding Sexual Partners

[QuellParticipant 2538]

This is the reason right here why birth rates are at their lowest in 101 years… the standards are ridiculous for anyone but the top chads.

In the study, the researchers surveyed 269 Norwegian university students who were former or current Tinder users regarding their experiences using the dating app.

Only 54 participants reported engaging in one-night stands following Tinder use and the majority of them had only experienced this once.

Of the entire sample, 80% did not achieve any sexual encounter thanks to Tinder and 13% achieved only one. Only 3% achieved two sexual encounters and 4% achieved more than two.

“We suggest that Tinder use for the majority of users is not very effective for acquiring new sexual partners. Apparently, most people would need a lot of matches in order to attain one meeting, and several meetings to accomplish one new sexual partner,” Grøntvedt told PsyPost.

https://www.psypost.org/2020/01/study-suggests-tinder-is-not-very-effective-for-acquiring-new-sexual-partners-55135

[SpiderHerderParticipant 3755]

I wonder if it’s harder for men to find partners or women ?

Beggars being choosers ?

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Dating Apps dont work because women arent evolved to handle such an enormous potential mate pool, combined with the digital interface which eliminates any iota of exposure to regular joes. Her innate biases immediately zero in on ‘Chads’ who themselves do not value the sexual affection a female can give therefore no relationship is sustainable. This is what Im talking about when I say Biological Precedents have been undermined.

for example

In Birmingham Alabama 1952, a 20 year old girl was limited in scope to the immediate sphere of males in her everyday life, her vicinity. Really, its anytime in human history prior to widespread Internet. Regular Joes used to be chosen by women because the women KNEW them in everyday life. Whatever these men lacked in looks; their personality, brains and familiarity was good enough to breed with! Women, prior to the internet, had about 100 male acquaintences to choose from at best, sometimes much much fewer. So guess what? Regualar men and regular women got hitched and a new generation of humans was born, just like every century before! If there was a ‘Chad’ in the small pool, his shallow nature could not compete with real men who may not have been as handsome, but they had brains, charm and loyalty that the woman was exposed to! The Chad issue was an outlier and defeated easily.

Flashforward to 2005 thru current… the age of Smart Phone internet Dating App addiction. Women’s previously narrow seletion pool of 100 has now increased 1000x, now she can swipe through 1 million men without ever having heard a Regular Joe cut a joke or do something charming for her… her Evo Psych selective bias lasers in on unloving Chad Thunderc~~~… and he plows through 10 women a week with out blinking an eye or feeling anything for these women. All the while 90 other men havent had the company of a woman in years!

The sick part is that this has made women demonstrably unhappy, mentally ill, angry, drug addled, suicidal etc… to say the least of the species birthrate! You cant undermine our biology like this without huge consequences.

Dating Apps were the WORST thing we could have ever allowed to happen. Either ban them or legalize prostitution! This is beyond politics or morality, they have literally Stalled the birthrate!!! This is a panic situation… waiting for 2020 census data!

[TwistParticipant]

Gravel Pit wrote:

This is a panic situation…

This is a popcorn situation.

Fixed it.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

lol Twist! I agree bro. Laughing is better than crying. What can we do in the face of such unbridled lunacy ? with handyman genes going extinct, while Chad genes are the only ones seeming to reproduce, where reproduction ever occurs anymore… The only reaction after anger, hate, crying and nihilistic resignation is to LAUGH at these dumb apes!

[SpiderHerderParticipant 3755]

Gravel Pit wrote:

The only reaction after anger, hate, crying and nihilistic resignation is to LAUGH at these dumb apes!

Can do !

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

SpiderHerder wrote:

I wonder if it’s harder for men to find partners or women ?

A lot of factors determine any individual man’s difficulty at finding sexual partners.

The difficulty for a woman to find sexual partners is determined solely by how slutty she is.

That should tell you your answer.

Gravel Pit wrote:

The sick part is that this has made women demonstrably unhappy, mentally ill, angry, drug addled, suicidal etc… to say the least of the species birthrate! You cant undermine our biology like this without huge consequences.

Surely that’s women’s problem, not ours.

[MonkParticipant 16977]

So they human race becomes extinct.

Er … remind me why I am supposed to care?

[bstoffParticipant 4863]

‘Idocracy” is well on it’s way here.
Probably coming early.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Monk wrote:

So they human race becomes extinct.

Er … remind me why I am supposed to care?

All that matters is you position yourself to inherit their stuff.

[Author]

Posts