New article about US!!!

[AwakenedParticipant 35201]

Hitman wrote:

even though the article is clearly skewed against us,
sometimes any press is good.
some man somewhere will read it,
and find his way here.
.

That’s a good point, and it’s also good for a laugh, and even validation to just remind us just how much THEY don’t get.

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[TwistParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Very contrary to the view that some of these men put out, it’s really hard to lose custody of your children,” said MacQuarrie,

“Very contrary to many of the historical reports, the camps were only for honest work and the opportunity to set yourself free”

[It’sallbsParticipant]

Louis Theroux is doing a new series next week called Dark States its all about how fcucked up america is apparently.

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[Chase PesosParticipant 2136]

— image not resolving or found —

Chase a check, never chase a chick...

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

I’m going my own way until there will be an university with a “CENTRE FOR RESEARCH ON VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN AND MEN”, and a new Convention of Istanbul claiming that historically women always parasitized men.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[UntamedParticipant]

Eric Lauder wrote:

I’m going my own way until there will be an university with a “CENTRE FOR RESEARCH ON VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN AND MEN”, and a new Convention of Istanbul claiming that historically women always parasitized men.

I’m going my own way until my last breath because I know it won’t get better for men out there, it’ll only get worse.
Why would they change laws that enrich and permit them to claim the moral high ground and rise in status over ALL life on this planet?
Why would I want someone in MY house dictating how I live? That’s not marriage, that’s servitude.

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[Anonymous 42]

Anonymous wrote:

911.

That’s all it takes to lose your kids, 911.

F~~~ing 911.

F~~~ing MORON.

If some crazy bitch sneaks in my back door to call 911, throw me out, have me arrested, and take over my home she’s in for a big f~~~ing surprise! I wiggled around the 911 service charge by purchasing an international plan, total $3.99 a month to anywhere U.S.

“I just dialed 911” and a recording says that number is invalid or out of service. NICE!

And the morrow of this story she was never heard from again…

WARNING: I DON’T CALL 911!

AND NEITHER CAN ANYONE ELSE!

Thank-you Callcentric! I love you!

[Dashing Young DissidentSpectator]

Didn’t read s~~~ as I was too busy not giving a f~~~ and having a danger wank.

[ZarathustraParticipant 2246]

The article is self defeating and only proves a point. Why ask a feminist for the meaning of MGTOW? They know nothing of our experiences, motivations, feelings or thoughts. If you want to know about MGTOW ask a man, but they expert they ask is a woman, proving the gynocentrism of culture today.

[neverAgainParticipant 1662]

The article is good except the part about the feminist Canadian professor

All good things come to an end.

[MGTOW KnightParticipant 7477]

“They have no real ability to identify the global forces that are at work in their life, so they hang the blame on feminists,”

This quote really stuck out at me.

It seems that she is insinuating that MGTOW are buffoon’s who don’t see the bigger picture.

This lady is a just another “educated” t~~~ projecting her own insecurites.

Globalization, automation, and feminism have eradicated the modern day man’s realm.

Boys are so lost in today’s society, but who the f~~~ cares?

Obviously not this c~~~.

Yet, we don’t see the global forces at work???

Give me a f~~~ing break c~~~, we see the writing on the wall.

It is stupid “educated” c~~~s like this who can’t face reality.

We see reality, and adapt accordingly.

You stupid feminists t~~~s try to make the world confirm to your insanity.

As typical, c~~~s don’t want to face the facts.

Easier to blame men.

Fuck bitches... literally and metaphorically

[Cú ChulainnParticipant 3910]

Yeah ok Barb, keep preaching to a fast emptying auditorium. Keep off my lawn.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

MGTOW Knight wrote:

“They have no real ability to identify the global forces that are at work in their life, so they hang the blame on feminists,”

This quote really stuck out at me.

It seems that she is insinuating that MGTOW are buffoon’s who don’t see the bigger picture.

This lady is a just another “educated” t~~~ projecting her own insecurites.

This isn’t a lady, this is a man-hating feminist working in a “research” centre bashing men and just only men for “violence against women and children” WHILE 90% INFANTICIDES ARE COMMITTED BY WOMEN! WHILE VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN IS COMMITTED BY WOMEN 70% TIMES WITHIN THE FAMILY AND 99% TIMES WITHIN KINDERGARDENS!

It’s projection, what else it can be? Projection, that’s all feminism is about.
Check my signature:

WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[MoreSkyParticipant 4865]

EDIT: sorry this turned out to be a bit longer than anticipated.

Members of the group say they’re not “men’s rights” activists, but critics say there’s plenty wrong with MGTOW.

Don’t give a f~~~ what feminists and manginas think.

Western University professor Barb MacQuarrie said they are misinformed and use “deplorable” rhetoric.

Misinformed? From her perspective perhaps so. In her view all men should be ignorant of the dangers of interaction with modern Western women.

“Deplorable” rhetoric?

Rhetoric (from wikipedia): “Rhetoric is the art of discourse, wherein a writer or speaker strives to inform, persuade or motivate particular audiences in specific situations”

Yep. Would agreed with that.

Deplorable (from dictionary.com):
1. causing or being a subject for grief or regret; lamentable:

2. causing or being a subject for censure, reproach, or disapproval; wretched; very bad:

So deplorable rhetoric = trying to inform on a subject that causes grief, is regrettable, or is lamentable.

and/or we are regularly subjected to censure, reproach or disapproval.

Yep. I would go with that as well.

If she meant we strive to inform on subjects that she finds wretched or very bad – then I would agree with that as well.

The description of the intent of MGTOW by a member is reasonable.

Barb later says:

“Very contrary to the view that some of these men put out, it’s really hard to lose custody of your children,”

Is she living on the same planet?

“They have no real ability to identify the global forces that are at work in their life, so they hang the blame on feminists,”

Completely unlike the feminists who would never consider blaming all the woes of the world on men (sarcasm – just in case a female lurker reads it and thinks I’m serious).

And it’s a generalisation to lump every MGTOW with “They have no real ability…” Isn’t making generalist assumptions a feminist no-no? and I think the correct response to her insinuation is to laugh at her complete lack of understanding of the intelligence, ability and diversity of MGTOW members.

She continues…

“They’re creating a space that other disillusioned, disenfranchised men are going to stumble into and get caught in.”

Let’s hope so.

She finishes with:

“It shows a complete lack of self-reflection,” she said. To MacQuarrie, the decision by these men to lead separatist lifestyles is more than just “a bit pathetic.”
“They’re only reinforcing each other’s really distorted perceptions of what’s happening in the world,” she said. “They are confining themselves knowingly to a life of isolation and a lot of limitations. It’s sad.”

A complete lack of self-reflection? I don’t know about you guys but one of the most critical and often undertaken activities I do after reading and being part this forum is self-reflection and consideration of past actions and poor decisions.

“..the decision by these men to lead separatist lifestyles is more than just “a bit pathetic.” – she’s resorted to throwing insults no because she doesn’t like it when she can’t control men.

“They’re only reinforcing each other’s really distorted perceptions of what’s happening in the world,” – Has she not seen some of the p~~~ing contests on the forum? As before the correct response to her insinuation is to laugh at her complete lack of understanding of the intelligence, ability and diversity of MGTOW members. There are MANY views I disagree with expressed here and I’m sure many disagree with mine but we understand that everyone is entitled to their opinion even if it differs from our own.

“It’s sad” – for her maybe as gender studies is meaningless if a) you only examine one of the two genders and b) the other gender doesn’t give a f~~~.

"...reinvent your life because you must; it is your life and its history and the present belong only to you.” It is Your Life, Charles Bukowski.

[NerevarParticipant 8040]

The replies here have convinced me to NOT read it.

"One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K

[Anonymous 54]

Im not even going to bother looking at this s~~~ anymore.
Let me guess..
He said a bunch of stupid uninformed s~~~ right?

I’ ll be going my own way, if anyone needs anything.

[It’sallbsParticipant]

Dashing Young Dissident wrote:

Didn’t read s~~~ as I was too busy not giving a f~~~ and having a danger wank.

exactly no f~~~s given.

dont get angry just don’t give a fcuck.

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

Dashing Young Dissident wrote:

Didn’t read s~~~ as I was too busy not giving a f~~~ and having a danger wank.

What is a danger wank?

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Dashing Young DissidentSpectator]

Jan Sobieski wrote:

What is a danger wank?

The act of extreme masturbation. You must “knock one out” whilst in close proximity to any of the following; Your mum, a nun, your boss, a member of parliament, George Michael. A person with capabilities to act upon catching you mid self-abuse obviously ups the ante. Ejaculation must be reached before your danger wank target comes (no pun intended) to investigate. The higher the chances of being discovered with one’s pants down, pulling one’s war face is obviously where the danger comes from. The more danger involved the harder (or softer) it is to complete the task in hand (sn~~~~~). The more dangerous the better. The chance of being arrested, pummelled by an angry father or having your hand severed by an arab’s sabre means that you are a pro “Danger wanker.”

[Anonymous 3]

That’s a woman for you. Shame and insult men until they refuse to be anywhere near here, then shame and insult men some more expecting that to get men to come back around her.

The fact that women can become professors, judges, professionals and all the rest is all the proof you need merit means nothing. Look at how stupid this woman is. Nothing she writes is intelligent, but everyone has bent over backwards insisting she is extremely intelligent and everyone else should listen to her because of her superior intelligence. When someone becomes a teacher or professor, or any professional, the idea is that they are smarter and better at that field than anyone else can be, so they are worth listening to as experts for that profession.

But what does this woman do that untrained people can’t naturally just do better and be smarter about?

Of course nothing will happen, but as I’ve said before, we need objectivity, merit, the truth to mean more than affirmative action.

[Author]

Posts