Netflix Doc – Liberated: The New Sexual Revolution

[Oz-BlokeParticipant 3233]

Interesting documentary now on Netflix called Liberated: The New Sexual Revolution – https://www.netflix.com/title/80222248
.

.
Documents how desperate young women are getting for male attention in the age of online porn and the rise of the 10-minute sexual relationship, ‘hook-up’ culture. The crew film a spring-breaker who competes in an onstage bikini / twerking competition (and doesn’t win). Cut to a post-twerk sit-down interview with her and she starts sobbing about how terrible it is that men see her as a sex object. Female Logic 101. An on-beach scence documents men yelling ‘t~~~-out-for the boys’ and many women oblige, one letting random men finger-bang her under her bikini bottoms. They ask some girls if they feel safe at the beach party. The girls say no, but hardly grab their things and head back to the hotel. More Female Logic 101.

Oh well, I guess one man’s slut is another woman’s free-spirited, sexually empowered, social-justice-warrior feminist.

#ManOut

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10907]

In todays environment Spring Break parties are where the next flood of accusations are going to occur. I’m surprised a few haven’t materialized. If I were a young man with a promising future I wouldn’t go near any party with women in attendance. STEM graduates beware.

Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

[Anonymous 7]

Eh, so it shows bitches on the carousel?
More entertaining would be when they realize the wall comes. Imagine the entertainment value of watching these skanks secure a blue-pilled, simps wallet.

That would be comedy gold.

[VerusParticipant 965]

This is why I facetiously say I’m thankful for feminism – because it freed men. It made sex easy to get outside of marriage, demolishing sexual access as a reason to marry. It removed the obligation to support and defend women. Nobody expects men to do s~~~ for a woman anymore except women who want their equality and chivalry at the same time, and news flash – you don’t get both. They wanted equality, they got it. And that’s gonna work for us better than it will for them. Watch them allow themselves to be used and call it empowerment, until the c~~~ carousel lets them off to go home to their cats.

[Will RobinsonParticipant 3479]

Damaged women. They need help before they make false allegations and ruin some innocent man’s life

May you walk in peace and happiness, May you and all mgtow, near and far walk in peace and happiness.

[FragmentedParticipant 2758]

I support these sluts sleeping with strangers. Why ? Because research shows after a woman has had 4 or more sexual partners, they can never properly bond again. They’re creating their own misery that they deserve. Have at it c~~~s. And the dumb vagina beggars will get #metoo’d in due time, like the idiots they are.

http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[Anonymous 12]

Fragmented wrote:

I support these sluts sleeping with strangers. Why ? Because research shows after a woman has had 4 or more sexual partners, they can never properly bond again. They’re creating their own misery that they deserve. Have at it c~~~s. And the dumb vagina beggars will get #metoo’d in due time, like the idiots they are.

Do you have a link to the research? Not doubting you, I am curious to read it as it makes sense.

[SH3LLZParticipant 5569]

More and more women are wondering what has happened to romance.

Say it with me GENTS!!!

WOMEN HAVE LOST THEIR VALUES, THEREFORE THEY HAVE LOST THEIR VALUE!

#ICETHEMOUT
#MANOUT

#ICETHEMOUT!!! #MANOUT!!! #HIDEYOURWEALTH #VAGINAISWORTHLESS

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Oz-Bloke wrote:

They ask some girls if they feel safe at the beach party. The girls say no, but hardly grab their things and head back to the hotel. More Female Logic 101.

And does this “documentary” call them out for that hypocrisy?

Of course not. Fake News 101

Mr. Spock wrote:

I’m surprised a few haven’t materialized.

You’ll have to wait a few years. They only start crying meetoo after they hit the wall.

[Anonymous 1]

Haha, women love being Sex Objects. It gives them constant attention and gives them something to complain about. Women’s two biggest needs.

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

what the trailer seems to show, and what women are eventually going to figure out (maybe) is that civilization is the sum of all the social contracts between people that govern behavior. Instead of asking “What does it mean to be masculine or feminine?”, the film might better have asked, “What does it mean to be civilized?”.

Feminism has sought to wreck those social contracts which have sustained the species for the eons it took humans to evolve from animals to civilized populations of people. Those social contracts take a long time to make their way into habitual behavior. And this is the reason experts have given for the much longer length of time it takes to raise a baby human to a functioning adult vs a baby monkey, bird, cat. Parents traditionally spent the first 15 -20 years teaching these behaviors to children so they could function as a ‘civilized’ adult. And historically, there were two parents so that a kid could have an example of each to learn from when being taught those social contracts.

The majority fo those kids on that beach were raised by single mothers who’ve taught them by their lived example that those contracts no longer apply. As those social contracts disappear, what’s left to govern behavior is instincts and reflexes. The most basic, durable instincts are aggression and sex, which is EXACTLY what the film is illustrating, wether its creators really intended to or not.

The earlier poster was correct: men are going to fare a lot better under those circumstances than women…

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

BrainPilot wrote:

what the trailer seems to show, and what women are eventually going to figure out (maybe) is that civilization is the sum of all the social contracts between people that govern behavior.

They’re not even social contracts, really.

They’re not even that official, and they existed long before societies were even a thing.

They’re simply mutually beneficial behaviors dictated by our sexual dimorphism (dictate by our huge brains). And they allow for society, not the other way around.

Those social contracts take a long time to make their way into habitual behavior. And this is the reason experts have given for the much longer length of time it takes to raise a baby human to a functioning adult vs a baby monkey, bird, cat. Parents traditionally spent the first 15 -20 years teaching these behaviors to children so they could function as a ‘civilized’ adult. And historically, there were two parents so that a kid could have an example of each to learn from when being taught those social contracts.

The cause and effect are a little backwards there.

Humans, lacking teeth or claws of any significance in the face of truly nasty things like sabertooths, evolved to out think other animals instead of outrun or out fight them. That takes a BIG brain. That big brain takes a hell of a lot of resources and time to grow to full usefulness. A single female is incapable of providing those resources or protecting the infant for those decades needed for it to become a functional adult.

This is where the mutually beneficial behaviors of pairbonding evolved. The male benefits from knowing he isn’t wasting effort and resources on children that aren’t his own. The female benefits from the resources and protection she is unable to provide herself. Both do their part to maximize the survival potential of their genes.

Once this partnership is formulated under the protection and provision of men, then societies can develop.

But now feminism has taught women the lie that they don’t benefit from these evolved in behaviors, and that women are somehow owed the protection and provision of men gratis, and forgot that men need to benefit alongside women or men stop being alongside women. So feminism took the benefits away from males, while dumping all the traditional responsibilities on them and more. Women rejected their evolved in behaviors (and are all the unhappier for it) substituting social constructs like government largess for men.

The number of women who eventually pop their feminist fantasy bubble and realize (too late) they are left unfulfilled in life without children or fathers for their children, shows this behavior really is instinctual.

Meanwhile It should be no surprise that once the benefits of fatherhood are gone, males walk away from the whole soured relationship. And without the protection and provision of men, that society falls.

But that is not our problem.

The most basic, durable instincts are aggression and sex,

Aggression isn’t really an instinct. It’s not a basic drive. It’s just one tool in a behavioral toolbox to achieve basic drives.

which is EXACTLY what the film is illustrating, wether its creators really intended to or not.

This film is illustrating that once a woman ceases to be a potential “motherhood object” for his children (and All Women Are Like That these days when fatherhood is off the table), she becomes nothing more than a temporary sex object to men, if even that.

And that is also not our problem.

[IRuleMeParticipant]

I actually watched about half the film. Here’s the thing. Do men poke and prod these women to do this stuff? Sure. Guys are f~~~ing horndogs. But the vast majority of women are okay doing this. Most of them need little if at all, encouragement. Otherwise, they wouldn’t go. They know what the deal is, they know what spring break is for, they know what happens down in Miami. It’s basically expected, and for most of the girls, they enjoy the attention. But that’s the culture that feminism helped cultivate. The video itself has lots of male shaming, and next to zero accountability for female behavior (which is to be expected). Women with their heads on straight don’t go to these things.

The “sexual revolution” is just an expansion of the old hippie movement of the sixties where women started exploring their sexuality and f~~~ing guys and engaging in orgies and threesome while getting high on weed and other drugs. It’s a full circle deal. It happened in the 60’s and 70’s, then took a break, and now it’s come back around. The ironic part is, I remember watching this kind of stuff on Vh-1 and MTV back in the 90’s. They always did spring break stuff, and I used to spank off to hot girls in bikinis even then.

[GnosticParticipant 2491]

Anonymous wrote:

Von wrote:

I support these sluts sleeping with strangers. Why ? Because research shows after a woman has had 4 or more sexual partners, they can never properly bond again. They’re creating their own misery that they deserve. Have at it c~~~s. And the dumb vagina beggars will get #metoo’d in due time, like the idiots they are.

Do you have a link to the research? Not doubting you, I am curious to read it as it makes sense.

http://socialpathology.blogspot.sg/2010/09/sexual-partner-divorce-risk.html

There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

[AttonParticipant]

The male pill, sex robots and VR porn, that is the second and final sexual revolution.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[bstoffParticipant 4863]

“I’m liberated” was Jim Rockford’s line when a woman asked him “What happened to chivalry?” after he cut her off getting into a phone booth.
TV show: The Rockford Files”.

Obviously a long time ago, but never forgotten.

For all millenials out there, a “phone booth” is a relic from the past.

[Rolling Tin FistParticipant 484]

I used to live in the US Spring Break mecca years ago. I was already over 30 and I would still blush at the sheer volume of seemingly “good girls” that were there to basically prostitute themselves. I saw this over, and over, and over again.

I remember a friend visited and I warned him to enjoy his time here but do not take any of the women as a keepers. He thought I was jaded. So I took him out for
a demonstration at one of my old stomping grounds.

During our stroll of open-air bars and clubs, I came across two of many women in a intoxicated state, at a bar I knew well. I signaled my buddy, non-verbally, to pay attention.

I started to politely greet the women and proceeded with some small talk, which went on for a couple of minutes. I then told them I would buy them their next round of beers if they would make out with each other.

Now, when I was their age, I would have expected a self-respecting slap across my face from a woman.

One of them giggled with confusion, and said, make out with you? My buddy’s jaw dropped. I said, no, I’m good, then motioned with my fingers indicating them. Again, a go-fcuk-yourself would have been a fair response.

But no, they looked at each other smiled, and made out with each other, for about a minute or so. When the bartender returned, I kept my end of the bargain, bought them a round, and told them to both have a nice night.

My buddy’s was silent and mortified until we reach the end of the block. He told me later that he never wanted to return to that block of bars and clubs ever again.

They just changed the name and added “new” in front of it. But make no mistake, it’s still the world’s oldest profession.

"Love is the delusion that one woman differs from another" - H. L. Mencken

[QuellParticipant 2538]

I feel bad for college guys in 2018:

By day engulfed in a sea of feminism and indoctrinated daily by loony professors. By night these guys are really putting themselves at risk for a false rape allegation given the alcohol and party atmosphere.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

bstoff wrote:

For all millenials out there, a “phone booth” is a relic from the past.

And the future.

Rolling Tin Fist wrote:

I used to live in the US Spring Break mecca years ago. I was already over 30 and I would still blush at the sheer volume of seemingly “good girls” that were there to basically prostitute themselves. I saw this over, and over, and over again.

That “Good Girl” in front of you is a Bad Girl for Chad.

AWALT.

[Author]

Posts