Nation Fears MGTOW

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Here’s the article from 2011 when society just started figuring out there was a movement, a MGTOW movement that was stealthy, grass roots and catching on.

In my estimation, the MGTOW movement politically is about where the mrm was 15 years ago. This makes sense because for MGTOW to gain momentum took almost a generation but is growing exponentially.

Here’s a great article from David Brooks, one of the most respected economists in the world and writer for the NY times, so, a liberal.

To not give us credit he will not use the words MGTOW but just fill in the blanks.

Bold is mine added.

“…my colleague David Leonhardt pointed out before MGTOW recently, in 1954, about 96 percent of American men between the ages of 25 and 54 worked as slaves to their wives and society. Today that number is around 80 percent. One-fifth of all men in their prime working ages are MGTOW,not getting up and going to work.”

“The result is this: There are probably more MGTOW, relaxing, self sufficient and free of social control idle men now than at any time since the Great Depression, and this time the problem is mostly structural, not cyclical due to feminists destroying our society from within allowing men to leave the plantation. As a result of rejecting slavedom, these men will find it hard to attract the unicorn rare decent, nawlt, rather than battle ax bitch feminist spouses. Many will pick up habits that have a corrosive cultural influence on those around them. They will never return, the barn door is open and the slaves are sprung. The country will not benefit from their potential abilities, so we’ll have to depend on women to run society…we’re f~~~ed.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/10/opinion/10brooks.html?rref=collection%2Fundefined%2Fundefined

Remember, this is a hard core feminist. Translation into logical english. Men are leaving the plantation, more men are happy fishing then anytime except when there was great economic calamity. A calamity saved by hard working men. The men who built the highways and bridges we drive on every day, until the economy recovered.

And the men are doing better financially then ever in history. And they are happier on surveys, women, no, their happiness is down.

So there you have it Gentle Men. MGTOW is a lot bigger than just the small group that hangs out here. Today 20% of the men have read the writing on the wall and have decided the only logical thing to do is drop out and live off the fat of the land. Just like our heffer land whales have been doing since that idiot king built the hanging gardens of Babylon for his crazy queen because she missed home.

The most popular theory is that the gardens were built by king Nebuchadnezzar II to make his wife happy. She was homesick for the plants and gardens of her homeland. King Nebuchadnezzar II ruled Babylon from 605BC, for a period of 43 years. It was during this time that he is said to have had the Hanging Gardens built

Nebuchadnezzar, what a mangina.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[RennieParticipant]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

Here’s the article from 2011 when society just started figuring out there was a movement, a MGTOW movement that was stealthy, grass roots and catching on. In my estimation, the MGTOW movement politically is about where the mrm was 15 years ago. This makes sense because for MGTOW to gain momentum took almost a generation but is growing exponentially. Here’s a great article from David Brooks, one of the most respected economists in the world and writer for the NY times, so, a liberal. To not give us credit he will not use the words MGTOW but just fill in the blanks. Bold is mine added.

“…my colleague David Leonhardt pointed out before MGTOW recently, in 1954, about 96 percent of American men between the ages of 25 and 54 worked as slaves to their wives and society. Today that number is around 80 percent. One-fifth of all men in their prime working ages are MGTOW,not getting up and going to work.” “The result is this: There are probably more MGTOW, relaxing, self sufficient and free of social control idle men now than at any time since the Great Depression, and this time the problem is mostly structural, not cyclical due to feminists destroying our society from within allowing men to leave the plantation. As a result of rejecting slavedom, these men will find it hard to attract the unicorn rare decent, nawlt, rather than battle ax bitch feminist spouses. Many will pick up habits that have a corrosive cultural influence on those around them. They will never return, the barn door is open and the slaves are sprung. The country will not benefit from their potential abilities, so we’ll have to depend on women to run society…we’re f~~~ed.”

Some people are starting to slowly catch onto the fact that the ship is going to sink.

[Anonymous 42]

Nation fears MGTOW? HA! MGTOW minds build strong FREE nations. The fear comes from feminized nations, and it appears that these nations are in peril, I wonder why? Goodby country, and goodby feminism, good riding to both!

[peterfaParticipant 833]

See, our nation doesn’t even understand freedom anymore. Our nation was founded on that principle. We were free.

[davParticipant 422]

“So we’ll have to depend on women to run society”

HAHAHA! Good luck with that.

[J.D SilvernailParticipant 383]

We need to raise more awareness. Recruit more members.

I'm married to the game,but she broke her vows.

[peterfaParticipant 833]

Maybe we should start our own country. Go find some place, say, Africa, with lots of resources, and cultivate it.

[jack reacherParticipant 751]

its the NY Times so of course the guy softens it by blaming the men. But that is the only time agency is assigned, with men.

If it were gash in the same numbers, it would never be the c~~~s choice, it would always be the patriarchy that forced the decision on them.

This on the one of the most privileged group of inept f~~~s that ever existed. Yes, that is you western broads. F~~~ing own it for once.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

@ Pascal

We did build our own country. It’s just that our wives took it in divorce.

Time to stop working on it, it belongs to her now, let her fix it.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Cipher HighwindParticipant 1144]

As a member of the “missing fifth”, I have seen the toil of the tax mule who labours for oligarchs and c~~~s, and I want no part of it.

[Vector VikingParticipant 413]

I don’t know why they’re calling us idle. I can’t speak for everyone, but believe it, I’m a contributor. I get the impression that most of you men are as well. The big difference for me is that I work just as hard at things I like doing- but since I’m no longer a hamster on the hedonic treadmill, I don’t have to work harder doing things I don’t like so I can make more money for my woman to spend at her whim.

The economic difference between myself and for example my father, is that my income isn’t being re-injected into the economy by a female via Wal-mart, Target, and HSN. My resources go to things that I need first and want second, and as a result less of my wealth is recirculated at the consumer level. My entertainment dollars aren’t being wasted on alcohol and cigarettes anymore, since going MGTOW I don’t feel the urge to self-medicate due to my stressful former blue-pill lifestyle. I ain’t knockin’ ya if you’re a smoker or drinker, so don’t take that as a dis. It just ain’t part of my plan anymore.

Call us “merciless destroyers of consumer culture”, fine. But idle, that’s just plain incorrect.

[Anonymous 5]

Vector Viking wrote:

I don’t know why they’re calling us idle. I can’t speak for everyone, but believe it, I’m a contributor. I get the impression that most of you men are as well. The big difference for me is that I work just as hard at things I like doing- but since I’m no longer a hamster on the hedonic treadmill, I don’t have to work harder doing things I don’t like so I can make more money for my woman to spend at her whim. The economic difference between myself and for example my father, is that my income isn’t being re-injected into the economy by a female via Wal-mart, Target, and HSN. My resources go to things that I need first and want second, and as a result less of my wealth is recirculated at the consumer level. My entertainment dollars aren’t being wasted on alcohol and cigarettes anymore, since going MGTOW I don’t feel the urge to self-medicate due to my stressful former blue-pill lifestyle. I ain’t knockin’ ya if you’re a smoker or drinker, so don’t take that as a dis. It just ain’t part of my plan anymore. Call us “merciless destroyers of consumer culture”, fine. But idle, that’s just plain incorrect.

I agree with you. And this is why corparations(the real leaders of the world) are so f~~~ing p~~~ed off at MGTOW. Wal-mart hates this idea as 90% of their shoppers are women/poor people. When men stop supporting women, Wal-Mart will lose lots of money. When men say “f~~~ marriage”(like they already are), chocolate companies, flower companies, hallmark, wedding companies, churches, event centers, clothing companies and a million other places LOSE money. The gold/diamond industry is TERRIFIED of MGTOW because they make the most money from marriage contracts and we are saying….f~~~ that….because in the end…we end up paying for it….as always….LOL.

Women are so f~~~ing selfish. All men asked for them was to cook/clean/sex and they can do whatever the f~~~ they want and we would be happy. Women on the other hand demand 1000 things from men….and now we say f~~~ it…we dont need women. I already cook and clean. The only thing a woman has to offer is her vagina…..which I am fine without because of porn. I get the urge for companianship, I go jerk off and it’s gone. 😛

[sidecarParticipant 35844]

@VectorViking: Exactly.

These so-called “idle” men are not idle.  Most of them are self sufficient.  But that’s just it: they are self sufficient.  They support themselves but they are not producing the massive surpluses of resources that they once did which nations, especially welfare states, have come to depend on.

Moreover, women are not just the majority of spenders, but they are spenders by nature.  That’s why the vast majority of marketing it targeted at women.  Men, in contrast, are savers.  They accumulate resources.  But while a large balance in your savings account is good for you individually, it’s of no use to the nation or other such institutions because, short of outright theft, unless you are circulating your wealth (like women do through profligate spending) they can’t skim a fat percentage off it.  This is why as things get worse we can expect to see the propaganda shift from complaining about “idle” men to complaining about “selfish” men.  It’s already started to happen.

[Author]

Posts