My Divorce lawyer story

[StealthParticipant 5330]

At the time of my divorce I had an estate worth 600k, due to working myself into an early grave by age 32. I started poor. It was all earned through excessive labor. My wife was a school teacher, who took summers off.

The second we hit 600k, my unicorn Christian wife told me she was leaving and coming after the money, which she had earned by doing dishes. She also wanted me to die. I hired a lawyer.

I thought the lawyer would strategize with me to defend against her villainy. Which he did, but his priority was the law. I guess that makes sense. He said we had to go by the terms of the law, even if wasn’t fair. The law said she gets half, unless she agrees to split it otherwise (pending court approval), or unless her counsel missed the paperwork deadline—then we get whatever terms I wanted. The terms I wanted were that we each take out what we put in, and go our separate ways.

Lo and behold, her lawyer missed the deadline! So I met with my lawyer to move forward with a more equitable division. “Well… I know I said that, but it doesn’t work that way.” He explained. If the judge saw his motion to override and proceed with a non-50% split, the judge would view that as unfair since it prevents my raging violent wife from taking 50% of our savings. He even phoned the legal clerk who handles these things, who confirmed it would be seen by the judge as a “s~~~ty” move.

Nobody seemed to notice that this entire project was a s~~~ty move on her part. Also, what happened to sticking to the law, even if seen as unfair? It was trumped by the agenda to give her half. Which meant years of my life, past and future. Roadblocked, in the end she ended up getting slightly more than half.

"Once you’ve taken care of the basics, there’s very little in this world for which your life is worth deferring." -David Hansson. "It’s not when women are mean or nasty that anything is out of the ordinary. It’s when they are NICE to you that you have to be on high alert..." -Jackinov.

[Anonymous 42]

With no fault divorce and modern tyrannical law, we’re witnessing the largest heist of material wealth ever witnessed by mankind! Wealth generated by men and ordered over to women by threat of imprisonment, in other words “judicial extortion”.

No is the word on marriage from an ethical, legal, and moral standpoint regarding men!

Women need to be rewarded to each her own value, and by the looks of things and how far they’ve degraded, I place their collective value to men at or below zero and most times a liability!

Marriage, cohabitation? No thank-you, have a nice day! Not worth the risk and damn little is the reward!

[CUNTHATERParticipant 324]

What an evil c~~~…You nearly killed yourself to build wealth & accelerate an early retirement to live that fairy tale/ “happily ever after” that we were brainwashed as kids…..I too thought I had found a church-going, multiple prayers per day, listening to Christian podcasts, painting Catholic icons, 35 y.o. virgin unicorn….just for the c~~~ to monkeybranch….Thank God I didn’t get to the point of marrying her….These c~~~s can turn on you on the dime! Never trust one no matter what….AWALT!!!

American cunts constantly think they live in a reality TV show.....Evil POSs....ALL CUNTS ARE THE SAME….THERE ARE NO UNICORNS!!! EVEN CHURCH GOING, PROCLAIMED VIRGINS ARE THE SAME CUNTS…..THEY ALL MONKEY BRANCH…TO HELL WITH THEM ALL!!!

[Anonymous 1]

A marriage certificate is a binding certification that there will never be “his” and “hers”…it will be all one bucket of “joint.” “Who put in what percentage” has zero bearing on the math.

Your lawyer was in the lawyer fraternity way longer than any relationship he had with you. Years before he met you, he was high-5ing his fraternity brothers, and will be for years after your last visit with him. He made x dollars from you, regardless of success, and “opposing” counsel (fraternity brother) made x dollars from your ex wife, regardless of outcome. The two fraternity brothers were likely high-5ing each other in the hallway DURING the divorce gymnastics.

Non equal = nonstandard = more paperwork = more hours = more $ for the lawyers. However, for the judge, non equal distribution = much more work for him…he has to now collect, document, consider, calculate and clearly justify for the record how/why he came to the non equitable distribution. The judge has no incentive to do the work it takes to do the right thing.

Oh yeah, and the judge is, of course, a fraternity brother.

It is in your lawyer’s best interest to say and go through the motions making you think there can be a much better split than 50/50. It is in the judge’s best interest to just do the 50/50.

In the end, everyone wins…except you, the former husband.

[The man in the mountainParticipant 4102]

I have a feeling that the divorce lawyer told you that so you wouldn’t try to hide any money, if you actually lost half of your stuff both lawyers in the case probably made a lot of money off of you.

It was strategical, let the rope slip in nice and easy around your neck..

This is why i don’t have respect for lawyers or other useful parasites of society, if it wasn’t for people like you busting their asses in society and running into problems, they wouldn’t have the Lexus nor the big 2 million dollar house.

Sure there may be lawyers that are fair or judges, but they have to prove to me that i should believe in them, i don’t just go around depositing my trust on people that all they do is meet appointments and push pencils across a desk.

[AutoliteParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Your lawyer was in the lawyer fraternity way longer than any relationship he had with you. Years before he met you, he was high-5ing his fraternity brothers, and will be for years after your last visit with him. He made x dollars from you, regardless of success, and “opposing” counsel (fraternity brother) made x dollars from your ex wife, regardless of outcome. The two fraternity brothers were likely high-5ing each other in the hallway DURING the divorce gymnastics.

The documentary ‘Divorce Corp’ is a must-watch for everyone on this forum. IMO it is a much better relations~~~/marriage deterrent than ‘The Red Pill Movie’.

It was at one time available on YouTube camouflaged under a different title…

[AttonParticipant]

He explained. If the judge saw his motion to override and proceed with a non-50% split, the judge would view that as unfair since it prevents my raging violent wife from taking 50% of our savings.

How much did she actually bring to the table in dollars and cents?

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[AutoliteParticipant]

CUNTHATER wrote:

I too thought I had found a church-going, multiple prayers per day, listening to Christian podcasts, painting Catholic icons, 35 y.o. virgin unicorn….just for the c~~~ to monkeybranch….

Newbies, you have been warned! The ‘church-going’ thing is all bulls~~~. Those women are no different. They’re all the same. Just remember… AWALT

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10907]

My attorney f~~~ed me by not filing paper work. I filed for a no fault divorce which is minimum 2 years unless her attorney was OK with divorcing sooner. Naturally she wanted to collect as much spousal support as possible so it went the full 2 years. Everything was settled and all my attorney had to do was file the paper work with the judge to sign the final divorce degree. He never did and I had to hire a different attorney to make sure everything was in order and file the paperwork. When my first attorney found out about it he said that he was “disappointed” that I went and did that and asked why I did that. I explained that I wanted the spousal support to be stopped from being taken from my paycheck ASAP and he said that I could easily recoup the overpayment. F~~~ him! I’m supposed to put him or another attorney on retainer and go to court to recoup the thousand dollars I over paid? I’d end up turning around and paying the retainer and court fees and come out no further ahead than as if I just bit the bullet and moved on.

Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

[BubParticipant 1403]

Anonymous wrote:

The judge has no incentive to do the work it takes to do the right thing.

I never vote to retain any judge. I always vote to throw the f~~~ers out. I actually smile as I fill in those little circles. It’s the best part of voting day……

Just rolling down the road

[Heave-Ho MgtowParticipant 1797]

Stealth
You are still young enough to regain your lost wealth. There is no justice in family court. Many men will learn your hard learned lesson in the biased equity of a marriage contract. Your helping others with your experience. Follow the path and keep moving forward as MGTOW.

skip the cavernous vag and go your own way

[JakeParticipant 908]

her half wont last long you will recover better than ever

[JakeParticipant 908]

very common that once there is real money they leave it happened to a mate no debt just finished new expensive house and hears I am not happy set for life then living with mum and dad I said you could have been lazy like me and not bothered apparently I didn’t what I was talking about

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

Like others here, I suspect your divorce attorney was focused on his own interests. More than a decade ago, my ex also failed to respond by the deadline. During the 60 day waiting period after being served, ex would occasionally call and demand money. I knew that I wasn’t legally required to give it to her (according to prenup’), but I also knew that as long as I was forking over some cash, she would continue to underestimate me. She always assumed I was more blue pill than I actually was.

When my lawyer found out I had sent her money, she reminded me I didn’t have to send it, and offered to call the ex and ‘explain’ to her. I refused. I knew that my lawyer was going to ‘explain’ to her that she needed to hire a lawyer of her own. I also knew that my ex would have her lawyer petition for me to pay her legal fees, and that this would be granted. Then, the two lawyers would happily drag out the fight for a couple years while draining any money I made over that time for arguing over whatever stupid s~~~ they made up to bill me for.

I continued to give my ex money because I knew that she was so childish and irresponsible that she would continue to ignore the legal papers if I did, and I wanted her to ignore them for 61 days. And that’s exactly what she did.

When my ex missed the deadline, I called my lawyer and told her to get the default divorce immediately, or I was going to fire her and get a new lawyer. I also told her that there were no more assets to fight over after paying off ex’s car, my car, all the bills and insurance etc etc etc. Most importantly, I explained that I didn’t think I could do my job safely with the distraction of a giant divorce fight going on. So, I had arranged to stop working and move in with family until the divorce was final.

Basically, I explained that there was no more money FOR ANYONE until I got my divorce finalized.

This is the key. If you have no money, no kids or nothing else of value to fight over, and no way to earn anymore money for them to take from you, then you are just clogging up the court dockets but not generating any money for the system and they want to be rid of you as quickly as possible. If you have any money, they are going to navigate you to the longest, slowest, most inefficient fight they can in order to drain as much of it from you as possible.

F~~~ family court lawyers!

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[Author]

Posts