My best friend in High school (Red-Pill)

[Lord HumungusParticipant 270]

Joe and I were best friends all through High school.

https://www.oxygen.com/snapped/crime-news/brandy-stutzman-recruits-teen-murder-husband-joe-stutzman

[StealthParticipant 5327]

Normally I’m silent in these events.

Military superstar survived combat in the third world,
but was no match for the villainy in his own home.

A reminder to us all.

"Once you’ve taken care of the basics, there’s very little in this world for which your life is worth deferring." -David Hansson. "It’s not when women are mean or nasty that anything is out of the ordinary. It’s when they are NICE to you that you have to be on high alert..." -Jackinov.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

She was a clear cut domestic abuser and he had a right to leave before she killed him. I feel bad for women injured by their husbands but loose my empathy when I hear that they’ve known forever that he was abusive but stayed around any way. That’s just a weakness of character. I think there is a little victim blaming that can be done here. She was obviously going to kill him. She was arrested a few days before for running him over with her car.

To some of the younger guys, at the first sign of violence, leave. Just walk out the door and never come back.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22503]

Stealth wrote:

Normally I’m silent in these events.
Military superstar survived combat in the third world,but was no match for the villainy in his own home.
A reminder to us all.

He ceetainly would have been a match for it if the soon to be khunt exwife hadn’t secretly drugged him.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[StealthParticipant 5327]

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

Stealth wrote:

Normally I’m silent in these events.Military superstar survived combat in the third world,but was no match for the villainy in his own home.A reminder to us all.

He ceetainly would have been a match for it if the soon to be khunt exwife hadn’t secretly drugged him.

That’s what I mean… the man faced chemical warfare in his own home.

"Once you’ve taken care of the basics, there’s very little in this world for which your life is worth deferring." -David Hansson. "It’s not when women are mean or nasty that anything is out of the ordinary. It’s when they are NICE to you that you have to be on high alert..." -Jackinov.

[MonkParticipant 16975]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

She was a clear cut domestic abuser and he had a right to leave before she killed him. I feel bad for women injured by their husbands but loose my empathy when I hear that they’ve known forever that he was abusive but stayed around any way.

I’ve worked for a PD, and it quickly became obvious to me that many wimmin are switched on by bad boys. Again and again they go back for more.

I think it’s a primitive thing – the bigger the thug, the better he will be at protecting offspring. It shows how basic wimmin really are.

That’s just a weakness of character. I think there is a little victim blaming that can be done here.

Perhaps not so much weakness of character, as an object lesson in the power of the Blue Pill. He was able to fight and kill other men, but just couldn’t face the truth about wimmin.

He couldn’t break the programming, and it cost him his life. That said, she only did in a short time what most wimmin do over decades. The Blue Pill kills them all in the end.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

I don’t know if it’s a red pill/blue pill thing as it affects women in large numbers. Do you think that what keeps women in abusive relationships is the illusion, taught by a lifetime of society and culture, that relationships that are abusive will somehow turn calm if she just went back one more time? Men we say that are blue pilled believe that their little cutie is the end all of their universe and that keeping her happy will inevitably lead to trickle down economies of emotions so that with happy wives the husbands may have happy lives.

Are women who stay in relationships fooled by a society that teaches them to take it, like men? Or is it the current theory, the Duluth Model, that says it’s the patriarchy that is teaching men to be abusive to their wives to control them?

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[GrumpyParticipant]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

Are women who stay in relationships fooled by a society that teaches them to take it, like men? Or is it the current theory, the Duluth Model, that says it’s the patriarchy that is teaching men to be abusive to their wives to control them?

Allow me to use an unpopular opinion, and equally unpopular answers regarding your questions.
First and foremost the “idea” forwarded in both statements (falsely) is that regardless of the avenue taken, women are the primary victims in everything life has to offer. Both “ideologies” absolve people in general, and women in particular of their own individual and personal responsibilities regarding their situation by proclaiming larger entities as the accessories/co-conspirators/saviours of their past/present/future situation/woes.

Society, meaning a collection of people (as its absolute basic interpretation), does not fool anyone with anything, nor does it “provide” anything without the various labours of men.
It controls the people within it’s community/communities with the rule of law (punishment), and by extension with shame, guilt, inclusion, and expulsion (see punishment), if it’s so called common good is not adhered to. The problem is that no one really understands who or what “common good” really means, because it changes constantly and rapidly to appease whomever appears to, or demands to be, the harbinger of change . So in essence society is ruled by fear, and demands that men make real sacrifices for the good of everyone else.

The Patriarchy ™, today means “bad man/men” rather than a male (usually a father) led family unit, and by extension community and then a “society”. In all honesty, if one looks at human history the only real matriarchy ever to survive (and still does) is in the family cave (err home), right up until a son is coerced by guilt and shame by the female members of his family/tribe to take up and shoulder the sacrifice of being the “man of the house”. Ergo the justification and need of the Patriarchy ™, so that a man makes real sacrifices again and still. Yet somehow the females are still the “victims” of their own decisions/demands.

Now,
We as individual persons teach each other how we will allow ourselves to be treated by each other, and how we will treat each individual “other” with our own words and actions. If I walk into a bar and declare that I can kick everyone’s butt, then give more cause for others to accept and act upon my challenge, that is not “abuse” that is a natural consequence.
For women, claiming abuse/victim hood is power, that is all

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[MonkParticipant 16975]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

Do you think that what keeps women in abusive relationships is the illusion, taught by a lifetime of society and culture, that relationships that are abusive will somehow turn calm if she just went back one more time?

‘I’ll change him’ is certainly a time honoured theme. Female ego is certainly involved as well. It’s the same reason that they hit on gay men.

Are women who stay in relationships fooled by a society that teaches them to take it, like men? Or is it the current theory, the Duluth Model, that says it’s the patriarchy that is teaching men to be abusive to their wives to control them?

Neither – both seek to blame men for the failings of others.

[SandalsParticipant 4253]

Didn’t read the whole article. Just skimmed it.

I always assume now that abused women did something to deserve it. Sorry, I know female nature too well. They provoke it deliberately, just like Bar Bar’s girl did to him (Barbarosa, that is).

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Grumpy wrote:

The Patriarchy ™, today means “bad man/men” rather than a male (usually a father) led family unit,

I hear that man. They take words and apply new meanings. Giving it a negative connotation.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

What a fvcked up ending for a good man whose only crime was marrying a some nasty ass hoe from Vegas. The bitch was cheating on him with Insane Clown Posse f@6gets… no doubt doing drugs/boozing galore in Joes home while he was on deployment. (Joe, a US service member and military contractor trying to provide for his family)

Merriweather told the jury that on the night of the murder, Brandy dosed Joe with sleeping pills, making him easy prey for the teen.

The military Vet Joe was poisoned/weakened before a fvcking coward ass ICP moron stabbed him to death, looks like Joe put up a hell of a fight, even losing a finger, before dying of blood loss in a giant pool of his own blood.

Brandy and Joe’s son, Aaron, is currently being raised by Brandy’s father.

That is a travesty.

GOD DAMN THAT. GOD DAMN ALL OF IT. Sorry to hear about your friend Humongus. That is bullsh!t. AWALT, some worse than others, SHE is a really evil k u n t and Im glad she is serving life (deserves way worse)

[Author]

Posts