My Approach To Modern Women

[KeithParticipant 482]

Women continue to believe men are just large children who have to be punished by withholding sex until they comply and submit to the “traditional” male role of being the marrying/committed man the non-traditional modern woman wants (Similar to being grounded). Why do the rules for women get to be dynamic when the rules for men have to be static?

I love modern, evolved, self-assured, self-reliant, high achieving, intelligent, well educated, well paid women. Gender equality is the most wonderful and amazing development of the modern age (I like it more than fast cars, microwave ovens and jet travel, to name a few) and here is why. . . .

When I was in my late teens and early 20’s I had to make some sort of an investment to get sex. That investment could be in the form of taking her out to dinner, the theater, to a movie, cutting the grass, fixing a pipe, changing a light bulb, going out with her friends, etc. Back then if I said I would “call” her, I knew that meant before I went to bed that day. Now it means that I only need to call her before I die. The 70’s and 80’s released us all from these burdens. Women wanted us to learn that they can do everything a man can do (including enjoying sex) and they don’t need a man to help her accomplish anything in life.

This change in social habits and mores has allowed me to approach dating as if I am going out with buddies. I am happy to share the cost of dating, let her pay for travel, ask me out and initiate spontaneous sex, etc. By doing this I believe I am helping her confirm her worth, equality and success at achieving it all in the “patriarchal” society her predecessors languished under for centuries. I do not fix anything, I lift nothing heavy, I avoid all references to the dark ages (before the age of equality) so as not be politically incorrect or insult the enlightened modern woman. If I am asked to perform some outdated sexist male task, I exclaim that I am being objectified and saddled with archaic sexual roles and that I cannot accept it.

It is true that men will have sex with as many women as they can and there is no shortage of women to provide it. Modern women who want non-committed sex are not rare nor are they an endangered species or under threat of extinction. Men can and do take advantage of these opportunities and now we are denigrated and insulted for it. This makes no sense to me whatsoever. Do the math ladies.

In this third millennium women have finally achieved what they wished and they need to SHUT UP AND STOP BITCHING about the fact that men embrace these new ideals.

There, I said it, I feel better now, don’t you?

ONCE UPON A TIME there was a man who never found a wife and he lived happily ever after. The End.

[RoyDalParticipant]

They will never stop bitching, not any more than the birds outside my window will stop chirping or my neighbor’s dog will stop yapping. It’s what they do.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[hmskl’dParticipant 6409]

During the past six months, the only woman I’ve conversed with for over five minutes is my dental hygienist .. and she did basically all the talking.

[NotMyProblemParticipant 965]

My approach is simple. I go on POF and I just lie to get what I want. I’ve been cheated on by every major girlfriend I’ve ever had, so at this point I don’t give a f~~~ about any of them. All they are is a hole to me.

I have a picture of myself in a suit and I basically embellish my success a wee bit. I am well off relatively speaking, but definitely no millionaire. I just make it seem like I’m a bit farther along than I actually am lol.

Oh and I usually shave 5-6 years off my age so I can still f~~~ the 20year olds. This makes things extremely easy. I act like a selfish motherf~~~er who expects to be treated like a King and they actually message and chase me.

As easy as that is, I still don’t really bother anymore. It’s too risky. I don’t wanna catch anything or let drama into my life. At some point I’ll have some more fun, but for now it’s just so much simpler to rub one out on youjizz.com

Like Bill Burr says, It’s the champagne of victory!

Not my property... Not my problem

[OldBillParticipant]

My approach to modern women is not to approach modern women and to deflect, deter, and derail most of their approaches towards me.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[KeithParticipant 482]

I had dinner with a “modern woman” as described above last night. She invited me to dine following an afternoon meeting we both attended.

To be clear, I asked her if we were getting separate checks or if she was paying. She indicated that since she invited me I was her guest and she would pick up the check. . . .so far, so good.

During dinner she talked about her teenage son’s obsession with video games/online games etc. and his lack of interest in girls, dating and socializing. I said nothing, as I recognized this as a trap. She pressed for my opinion and I said “I don’t know your son, so I could not possibly analyze his motivations”. She then said “well you’re a guy, why do guys like solitary self-involved activities instead of trying to meet girls”? (Yikes)

At this point I had enough, I informed her that men are now disposable, women have made it clear that they don’t need men for anything and her son has probably received that memo. I told her that men engage in activities they find enjoyable, not activities that are taxing, combative, arduous and unproductive. I speculated that he has done the math and made a decision based on the product of that equation.

Her jaw dropped and dinner was over. I did ask her if she didn’t want to hear the answer, why did she ask the question?

It had to be said.

ONCE UPON A TIME there was a man who never found a wife and he lived happily ever after. The End.

[narwhalParticipant]

Women continue to believe men are just large children who have to be punished by withholding sex until they comply and submit to the “traditional” male role of being the marrying/committed man the non-traditional modern woman wants (Similar to being grounded). Why do the rules for women get to be dynamic when the rules for men have to be static?

The bolded part is not true. Men are portrayed as large children in media, as it appeals to women, but every woman knows men are much more useful then children in reality. You don’t ask a child to pay for dinner, buy you nice things, and essentially fund your lifestyle. You expect a child to fix your problems for you. When you’re stock in a tough situation, you don’t call up a child to tell you what to do, or simply make the situation go away for you.

I agree 100% that they will play both the ‘equal’ card and ‘traditional’ card whenever it suits their interest. My response is that I no longer play the traditional role. It’s not that dislike that role, I think I’d honestly prefer it. However, given the divorce laws, work environments, and society in general, playing a traditional role comes with huge risks, financially and emotionally, with no benefits.

Ok. Then do it.

[JosephParticipant 125]

I could write a book on the subject.

My approach is to target the 26-32 range. I skip profiles without body pictures (fatties), and profiles without descriptions (high queens), and focus on elaborated, happy descriptions (crazies).

I make a comment on something on the profile so it appears as if I actually read it. They often reply and the game begins.

I drive the whole thing. I do not rush anything so they lower their defenses. Then we go for a coffee and I don’t make any move on them except for backhanded complements (“you do look average, which is good because hot girls are really nasty sometimes”). This lowers their self-steem. Date 1 ends with no intent or approach on my part.

I let her cool down for 3-4 days, so she thinks I am not interested, which lowers her princess complex. During that time I am doing date 1 with other chicks, of course. After 3-4 days I contact them out of the blue for another date. The mere fact that I contact them when they thought they were discarded raises their joy and usually accept a date immediately.

Date 2 has usually a kiss, which I always do in the most non-romantic way possible. Instead of setting up a scene, I kiss her whenever I feel like it. That makes them feel oh-so-romantic.

To guarantee that date 3 will involve sex, I already discuss it in date 2, making clear that, naturally, if there is no sexual attraction (if she does not put out) there is no chemistry, and if there is no chemistry we should not date. Here is where she feels pressured to have sex with me and knows, from date 1, that I may not call her again otherwise.

(feminists, if you are reading this and what to shout “rape” just shup up and go back to the kitchen).

Date 3 ends in bed 100% of the time. Afterwards, I usually tell them that I did not feel chemistry. Generally speaking they get really offended and cut the call expecting me to call them again, which never happens.

Here is the absolutely most important tip: NEVER repeat. God knows I had the urge, baby Jesus knows that I had some of the hottest girls I could not even dream of having, but the rule must be respected. If you do them more than once you run the risk of them becoming clingy and spoiling the apple cart.

[JosephParticipant 125]

Keith wrote:

To be clear, I asked her if we were getting separate checks or if she was paying. She indicated that since she invited me I was her guest and she would pick up the check. . . .so far, so good.

During dinner she talked about her teenage son’s obsession with video games/online games etc.

I swear I knew she was a single mom the second she agreed to pay the bill. Did you notice that your paper money says “dollars” and hers says “alimony”?

Besides, a kid came out of that vagina…her boobs are looking south and her pussy is stretched, who wants to hit that when the kid is not yours? Or if she has a c-section, those look real ugly.

Your answer was flawless, of course, and you knew that would end the dinner and still did it, which is pretty cool. However, allow me to remind you that cash is not the only form of payment we men do.

I would not go on a dinner to waste 2 hours of my time hearing a chick complain about anything even if the dinner is on her.

Just food for thought, my friend.

[KeithParticipant 482]

Joseph wrote:

I would not go on a dinner to waste 2 hours of my time hearing a chick complain about anything even if the dinner is on her.

I had no expectations or desire to bed her, but it was the c~~~tail hour (I’m Irish) and dinner was right behind it, so it served a utilitarian purpose.

I don’t hate women, I hate their conflicts. I truly believe they are conflicted by their nature and desire to be “wives” (n the traditional sense) and their sense of obligation to be “equal” because of the shrill, loud, screaming of feminists.

I guess going to dinner with her was a “hit and run” tactic.

P.S. The dinner was good, the liquor was better.

ONCE UPON A TIME there was a man who never found a wife and he lived happily ever after. The End.

[Anonymous 42]

My Approach To Modern Women…..

[AscendedParticipant 698]

My approach to women:

"We are free to follow our own path. There are those who will take that freedom from us, and too many of you gladly give it. But it is our ability to choose – whatever you think is true – that makes us human. There is no book or teacher to give you the answers, to show you the path. Choose your own way! Do not follow me, or anyone else."

[Author]

Posts